OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of the superimposition of three-dimensional (3D) digital models using the palatal surface as a reference for measuring tooth movements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Maxillary plaster models were selected from 20 patients. The right and left canines, premolars, and molars were individually cut underneath the gingival margins and set up in wax (plaster model 1 = PM1). The PM1s were scanned to create 3D digital models (digital model 1 = DM1). Teeth on the PM1s were randomly moved (plaster model 2 = PM2) and subsequently scanned to produce another set of 3D digital models (digital model 2 = DM2). DM1s and DM2s were superimposed using the palatal area as reference via surface-to-surface matching software, and the changes in tooth movement were calculated. In the plaster models, the tooth movements were directly measured using the Reference Measurement Instrument. A paired t-test and a correlation analysis were performed to determine whether the two measurement methods differed significantly. RESULTS: The means of the anteroposterior (x-axis), transverse (y-axis), and vertical (z-axis) tooth movements of the plaster models and the digital models did not differ significantly, and very high correlations were found between the plaster models and the digital models. CONCLUSION: From a technical point of view, the superimposition of 3D digital models using the palatal surface provides accurate and reliable measurements, but it remains to be investigated how stable the palatal surface is longitudinally after growth and/or orthopedic treatment take place.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of the superimposition of three-dimensional (3D) digital models using the palatal surface as a reference for measuring tooth movements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Maxillary plaster models were selected from 20 patients. The right and left canines, premolars, and molars were individually cut underneath the gingival margins and set up in wax (plaster model 1 = PM1). The PM1s were scanned to create 3D digital models (digital model 1 = DM1). Teeth on the PM1s were randomly moved (plaster model 2 = PM2) and subsequently scanned to produce another set of 3D digital models (digital model 2 = DM2). DM1s and DM2s were superimposed using the palatal area as reference via surface-to-surface matching software, and the changes in tooth movement were calculated. In the plaster models, the tooth movements were directly measured using the Reference Measurement Instrument. A paired t-test and a correlation analysis were performed to determine whether the two measurement methods differed significantly. RESULTS: The means of the anteroposterior (x-axis), transverse (y-axis), and vertical (z-axis) tooth movements of the plaster models and the digital models did not differ significantly, and very high correlations were found between the plaster models and the digital models. CONCLUSION: From a technical point of view, the superimposition of 3D digital models using the palatal surface provides accurate and reliable measurements, but it remains to be investigated how stable the palatal surface is longitudinally after growth and/or orthopedic treatment take place.
Authors: Jennifer L Ashmore; Brenda F Kurland; Gregory J King; Timothy T Wheeler; Joseph Ghafari; Douglas S Ramsay Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Leonardo T Camardella; Oswaldo V Vilella; K Hero Breuning; Felipe de Assis Ribeiro Carvalho; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Edwin M Ongkosuwito Journal: J Orofac Orthop Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 1.938
Authors: Daniela Garib; Felicia Miranda; Marilia S Yatabe; José Roberto Pereira Lauris; Camila Massaro; James A McNamara; Hera Kim-Berman; Guilherme Janson; Rolf G Behrents; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Antonio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas Journal: Orthod Craniofac Res Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 1.826