Literature DB >> 26549917

REGISTRATION OF ORTHODONTIC DIGITAL MODELS.

Dan Grauer, Lucia H Cevidanes, Donald Tyndall, Martin A Styner, Patrick M Flood, William R Proffit.   

Abstract

Current methods to assess outcomes and change in orthodontics are comparison of photographs, cephalometric measurements and superimpositions, and comparisons/measurements on dental casts. Digital models are a relatively new records modality in orthodontics. They offer numerous advantages in terms of storage space, spatial registration and superimposition. The purpose of this chapter is to determine the reproducibility of: 1) establishing occlusion of independently scanned digital models; and 2) registering digital models obtained after treatment on their homologous digital model setups produced before treatment. Reliability of both procedures was assessed with two random samples of five patient's models. In both experiments, three replicate positionings of the models per patient were created and variability in position was evaluated by the maximum surface difference between replicates, and the standard deviation of the surface distances between replicates respectively. Based on the data obtained, we concluded that it is reliable to register independently scanned models to a scanned surface of the models in occlusion. Surface-to-surface registration of final orthodontic digital models to planned setup models also is reproducible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  digital models; digital orthodontic casts; orthodontic tooth movement; orthodontic treatment outcomes; registration

Year:  2011        PMID: 26549917      PMCID: PMC4636130     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniofac Growth Ser        ISSN: 0162-7279


  33 in total

1.  Computer-assisted treatment planning and analysis.

Authors:  A C Beers; W Choi; E Pavlovskaia
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Validation of Align Technology's Treat III digital model superimposition tool and its case application.

Authors:  R J Miller; E Kuo; W Choi
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models.

Authors:  Oded Zilberman; Jan A V Huggare; Konstantinos A Parikakis
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements.

Authors:  Daron R Stevens; Carlos Flores-Mir; Brian Nebbe; Donald W Raboud; Giseon Heo; Paul W Major
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Orthodontic study cast analysis--reproducibility of recordings and agreement between conventional and 3D virtual measurements.

Authors:  Anders P G Sjögren; Jan E Lindgren; Jan A V Huggare
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Balancing the books on orthodontic treatment: an integrated analysis of change.

Authors:  L E Johnston
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1996-05

7.  Sutural growth of the upper face studied by the implant method.

Authors:  A Björk
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.

Authors:  Brian Rheude; P Lionel Sadowsky; Andre Ferriera; Alex Jacobson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models.

Authors:  S Russell Mullen; Chris A Martin; Peter Ngan; Marcia Gladwin
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  A novel method for the assessment of three-dimensional tooth movement during orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Insan Jang; Motohiro Tanaka; Yoshiyuki Koga; Seiko Iijima; Joseph H Yozgatian; Bong Kuen Cha; Noriaki Yoshida
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  2 in total

1.  Skeletally anchored mesialization of molars using digitized casts and two surface-matching approaches : Analysis of treatment effects.

Authors:  Kathrin Becker; Benedict Wilmes; Chantal Grandjean; Sivabalan Vasudavan; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Effect of clear aligner wear protocol on the efficacy of tooth movement.

Authors:  Mays Al-Nadawi; Neal D Kravitz; Ismaeel Hansa; Laith Makki; Donald J Ferguson; Nikhilesh R Vaid
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.