Leonardo T Camardella1, Eduardo Kant C Rothier2, Oswaldo V Vilella2, Edwin M Ongkosuwito3, Karel Hero Breuning3. 1. Department of Orthodontics, Dental School, Federal Fluminense University, Mário Santos Braga Street, 30, 2º Floor, Room 214, Niteroi, RJ, 24020-140, Brazil. leocamardella@globo.com. 2. Department of Orthodontics, Dental School, Federal Fluminense University, Mário Santos Braga Street, 30, 2º Floor, Room 214, Niteroi, RJ, 24020-140, Brazil. 3. Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacal Biology and Cleft Palate, Craniofacial Centre, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A plaster dental model is a patient's traditional three-dimensional (3D) record. If the dental crowns from a plaster model are separated and positioned in wax, this setup of the crowns can be used to simulate orthodontic treatment. The traditional way to make this dental setup requires significant time by the orthodontist and in the orthodontic lab. New developments in dentistry and orthodontics include the possibility of virtual setups. AIM: In this article, the differences between conventional setups with plaster models and virtual setups are discussed. METHODS: A clinical patient is described for whom two different setups were made and compared by model superimposition with Geomagic Qualify software. RESULTS: According to the literature and the results from this study, virtual setups and conventional setups with plaster models are equally accurate. CONCLUSION: Virtual setups present several advantages, e.g., digital storage, digital models cannot be damaged, the same model can undergo several treatment simulations, and communication between dental and surgical professionals and between dental professionals and patients is facilitated. Despite these advantages, considerable time and training are needed for dental professionals to master and adopt the general use of digital models and virtual setups in dentistry.
BACKGROUND: A plaster dental model is a patient's traditional three-dimensional (3D) record. If the dental crowns from a plaster model are separated and positioned in wax, this setup of the crowns can be used to simulate orthodontic treatment. The traditional way to make this dental setup requires significant time by the orthodontist and in the orthodontic lab. New developments in dentistry and orthodontics include the possibility of virtual setups. AIM: In this article, the differences between conventional setups with plaster models and virtual setups are discussed. METHODS: A clinical patient is described for whom two different setups were made and compared by model superimposition with Geomagic Qualify software. RESULTS: According to the literature and the results from this study, virtual setups and conventional setups with plaster models are equally accurate. CONCLUSION: Virtual setups present several advantages, e.g., digital storage, digital models cannot be damaged, the same model can undergo several treatment simulations, and communication between dental and surgical professionals and between dental professionals and patients is facilitated. Despite these advantages, considerable time and training are needed for dental professionals to master and adopt the general use of digital models and virtual setups in dentistry.
Authors: Daron R Stevens; Carlos Flores-Mir; Brian Nebbe; Donald W Raboud; Giseon Heo; Paul W Major Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Matthew G Wiranto; W Petrie Engelbrecht; Heleen E Tutein Nolthenius; W Joerd van der Meer; Yijin Ren Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Maria Eduarda Assad Duarte; Bruno Frazão Gribel; Alice Spitz; Flavia Artese; José Augusto Mendes Miguel Journal: Angle Orthod Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 2.079
Authors: Olivier de Waard; Robin Bruggink; Frank Baan; Hendrikus A J Reukers; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Edwin M Ongkosuwito Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-12-28 Impact factor: 4.241