Literature DB >> 20480756

Eight recommendations for policies for communicating abnormal test results.

Hardeep Singh1, Meena S Vij.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health care organizations continue to struggle to ensure that critical findings are communicated and acted on in a timely and appropriate manner. Recent research highlights the risks of communication breakdowns along the entire spectrum of test-result abnormality, including significantly abnormal but nonemergent findings. Evidence-based and practical institutional policies must uphold effective processes to guide communication of abnormal test results. Eight recommendations for effective policies on communication of abnormal diagnostic test results were developed based on policy refinement at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Houston), institutional experience with test result management, and findings from research performed locally and elsewhere. KEY FACETS OF EFFECTIVE POLICIES: Research findings on vulnerabilities in existing policies and procedures were taken into consideration. The eight recommendations are based on important refinements to the policy which clarified staff roles and responsibilities for test ordering, follow-up, and communication; defined categories of abnormal test results to guide appropriate follow-up action; and elaborated procedures for monitoring the effectiveness of test result communication and follow-up. Participation of key stakeholders is recommended to enhance buy-in from personnel and to help ensure the policies feasibility and sustainability.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed recommendations for ensuring safe test-result communication may be potentially useful to a wide variety of institutions and health care settings. These practical suggestions, based on research findings and experiences with a previous policy, may be a useful guide for designing or amending policies for safe test-result communication in both inpatient and outpatient settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20480756     DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(10)36037-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf        ISSN: 1553-7250


  28 in total

1.  Does integrating nonurgent, clinically significant radiology alerts within the electronic health record impact closed-loop communication and follow-up?

Authors:  Stacy D O'Connor; Anuj K Dalal; V Anik Sahni; Ronilda Lacson; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Organization Communication Factors and Abnormal Mammogram Follow-up: a Qualitative Study Among Ethnically Diverse Women Across Three Healthcare Systems.

Authors:  Jazmine D Kenny; Leah S Karliner; Karla Kerlikowske; Celia P Kaplan; Ana Fernandez-Lamothe; Nancy J Burke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Linking acknowledgement to action: closing the loop on non-urgent, clinically significant test results in the electronic health record.

Authors:  Anuj K Dalal; Bailey M Pesterev; Katyuska Eibensteiner; Lisa P Newmark; Lipika Samal; Jeffrey M Rothschild
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Improving test result follow-up through electronic health records requires more than just an alert.

Authors:  Dean F Sittig; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Consensus Statement for the Management and Communication of High Risk Laboratory Results.

Authors:  Craig Campbell; Grahame Caldwell; Penelope Coates; Robert Flatman; Andrew Georgiou; Andrea Rita Horvath; Que Lam; Hans Schneider
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2015-08

6.  The Impact of Automated Notification on Follow-up of Actionable Tests Pending at Discharge: a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Anuj K Dalal; Adam Schaffer; Esteban F Gershanik; Ranganath Papanna; Katyuska Eibensteiner; Nyryan V Nolido; Cathy S Yoon; Deborah Williams; Stuart R Lipsitz; Christopher L Roy; Jeffrey L Schnipper
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Pathology consultation on reporting of critical values.

Authors:  Jonathan R Genzen; Christopher A Tormey
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record-based Triggers to Detect Delays in Follow-up of Abnormal Lung Imaging Findings.

Authors:  Daniel R Murphy; Eric J Thomas; Ashley N D Meyer; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Assigning responsibility to close the loop on radiology test results.

Authors:  Janice L Kwan; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  Diagnosis (Berl)       Date:  2017-06-15

10.  Application of Human Factors Methods to Understand Missed Follow-up of Abnormal Test Results.

Authors:  Deevakar Rogith; Tyler Satterly; Hardeep Singh; Dean F Sittig; Elise Russo; Michael W Smith; Don Roosan; Viraj Bhise; Daniel R Murphy
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.