Literature DB >> 25961634

Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record-based Triggers to Detect Delays in Follow-up of Abnormal Lung Imaging Findings.

Daniel R Murphy1, Eric J Thomas1, Ashley N D Meyer1, Hardeep Singh1.   

Abstract

Purpose To develop an electronic health record (EHR)-based trigger algorithm to identify delays in follow-up of patients with imaging results that are suggestive of lung cancer and to validate this trigger on retrospective data. Materials and Methods The local institutional review board approved the study. A "trigger" algorithm was developed to automate the detection of delays in diagnostic evaluation of chest computed tomographic (CT) images and conventional radiographs that were electronically flagged by reviewing radiologists as being "suspicious for malignancy." The trigger algorithm was developed through literature review and expert input. It included patients who were alive and 40-70 years old, and it excluded instances in which appropriate timely follow-up (defined as occurring within 30 days) was detected (eg, pulmonary visit) or when follow-up was unnecessary (eg, in patients with a terminal illness). The algorithm was iteratively applied to a retrospective test cohort in an EHR data warehouse at a large Veterans Affairs facility, and manual record reviews were used to validate each individual criterion. The final algorithm aimed at detecting an absence of timely follow-up was retrospectively applied to an independent validation cohort to determine the positive predictive value (PPV). Trigger performance, time to follow-up, reasons for lack of follow-up, and cancer outcomes were analyzed and reported by using descriptive statistics. Results The trigger algorithm was retrospectively applied to the records of 89 168 patients seen between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2009. Of 538 records with an imaging report that was flagged as suspicious for malignancy, 131 were identified by the trigger as being high risk for delayed diagnostic evaluation. Manual chart reviews confirmed a true absence of follow-up in 75 cases (trigger PPV of 57.3% for detecting evaluation delays), of which four received a diagnosis of primary lung cancer within the subsequent 2 years. Conclusion EHR-based triggers can be used to identify patients with suspicious imaging findings in whom follow-up diagnostic evaluation was delayed. (©) RSNA, 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25961634      PMCID: PMC4613876          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  39 in total

1.  Characteristics and predictors of missed opportunities in lung cancer diagnosis: an electronic health record-based study.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Kamal Hirani; Himabindu Kadiyala; Olga Rudomiotov; Traber Davis; Myrna M Khan; Terry L Wahls
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Eight recommendations for policies for communicating abnormal test results.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Meena S Vij
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2010-05

3.  Informatics tools for the development of action-oriented triggers for outpatient adverse drug events.

Authors:  Hillary J Mull; Jonathan R Nebeker; Jonathan Rich Nebeker
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

4.  Timeliness across the continuum of care in veterans with lung cancer.

Authors:  Adam A Powell; Ellen M Schultz; Diana L Ordin; Mark A Enderle; Barry A Graham; Melissa R Partin; Michael K Gould
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 15.609

5.  Respiratory isolation of tuberculosis patients using clinical guidelines and an automated clinical decision support system.

Authors:  C A Knirsch; N L Jain; A Pablos-Mendez; C Friedman; G Hripcsak
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Identifying causes of adverse events detected by an automated trigger tool through in-depth analysis.

Authors:  S E Muething; P H Conway; E Kloppenborg; A Lesko; P J Schoettker; M Seid; U Kotagal
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-08-25

7.  Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential?

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Eric J Thomas; Shrinidi Mani; Dean Sittig; Harvinder Arora; Donna Espadas; Myrna M Khan; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-28

Review 8.  Errors in cancer diagnosis: current understanding and future directions.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Saurabh Sethi; Martin Raber; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Failure to recognize newly identified aortic dilations in a health care system with an advanced electronic medical record.

Authors:  Jennifer R S Gordon; Terry Wahls; Ruth C Carlos; Iraklis I Pipinos; Gary E Rosenthal; Peter Cram
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Timeliness of care in veterans with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Michael K Gould; Sharfun J Ghaus; Julie K Olsson; Ellen M Schultz
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  16 in total

1.  Addition of the Fleischner Society Guidelines to Chest CT Examination Interpretive Reports Improves Adherence to Recommended Follow-up Care for Incidental Pulmonary Nodules.

Authors:  Jennifer S McDonald; Chi Wan Koo; Darin White; Thomas E Hartman; Claire E Bender; Anne-Marie G Sykes
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Detection and Remediation of Misidentification Errors in Radiology Examination Ordering.

Authors:  Scott E Sheehan; Nasia Safdar; Hardeep Singh; Dean F Sittig; Michael A Bruno; Kelli Keller; Samantha Kinnard; Michael C Brunner
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Electronic Detection of Delayed Test Result Follow-Up in Patients with Hypothyroidism.

Authors:  Ashley N D Meyer; Daniel R Murphy; Aymer Al-Mutairi; Dean F Sittig; Li Wei; Elise Russo; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Responsibility for follow-up during the diagnostic process in primary care: a secondary analysis of International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership data.

Authors:  Brian D Nicholson; Clare R Goyder; Clare R Bankhead; Berit S Toftegaard; Peter W Rose; Hans Thulesius; Peter Vedsted; Rafael Perera
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Application of Electronic Algorithms to Improve Diagnostic Evaluation for Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel R Murphy; Ashley N D Meyer; Viralkumar Vaghani; Elise Russo; Dean F Sittig; Kyle A Richards; Li Wei; Louis Wu; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  Development of an Electronic Trigger to Identify Delayed Follow-up HbA1c Testing for Patients with Uncontrolled Diabetes.

Authors:  Brianna Knoll; Leora I Horwitz; Kira Garry; Jeanne McCloskey; Arielle R Nagler; Himali Weerahandi; Wei-Yi Chung; Saul Blecker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Translating electronic health record-based patient safety algorithms from research to clinical practice at multiple sites.

Authors:  Andrew J Zimolzak; Hardeep Singh; Daniel R Murphy; Li Wei; Sahar A Memon; Divvy K Upadhyay; Saritha Korukonda; Lisa Zubkoff; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  BMJ Health Care Inform       Date:  2022-07

8.  Electronic Trigger-Based Intervention to Reduce Delays in Diagnostic Evaluation for Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Daniel R Murphy; Louis Wu; Eric J Thomas; Samuel N Forjuoh; Ashley N D Meyer; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  The global burden of diagnostic errors in primary care.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Gordon D Schiff; Mark L Graber; Igho Onakpoya; Matthew J Thompson
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Implementation science for ambulatory care safety: a novel method to develop context-sensitive interventions to reduce quality gaps in monitoring high-risk patients.

Authors:  Kathryn M McDonald; George Su; Sarah Lisker; Emily S Patterson; Urmimala Sarkar
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.