Jazmine D Kenny1, Leah S Karliner2, Karla Kerlikowske3, Celia P Kaplan2, Ana Fernandez-Lamothe2, Nancy J Burke4. 1. Department of Public Health, School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, University of California , Merced, CA, USA. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine at the University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. Department of Medicine and Epidemiology/Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. Department of Public Health, School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, University of California , Merced, CA, USA. nburke2@ucmerced.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regular mammogram screening for eligible average risk women has been associated with early detection and reduction of cancer morbidity and mortality. Delayed follow-up and resolution of abnormal mammograms limit early detection efforts and can cause psychological distress and anxiety. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to gain insight from women's narratives into how organizational factors related to communication and coordination of care facilitate or hinder timely follow-up for abnormal mammogram results. DESIGN: We conducted 61 qualitative in-person interviews with women from four race-ethnic groups (African American, Chinese, Latina, and White) in three different healthcare settings (academic, community, and safety-net). PARTICIPANTS: Eligible participants had an abnormal mammogram result requiring breast biopsy documented in the San Francisco Mammography Registry in the previous year. APPROACH: Interview narratives included reflections on experience and suggested improvements to communication and follow-up processes. A grounded theory approach was used to identify themes across interviews. KEY RESULTS: Participants' experiences of follow-up and diagnosis depended largely on communication processes. Twenty-one participants experienced a follow-up delay (> 30 days between index mammogram and biopsy). Organizational factors, which varied across different institutions, played key roles in effective communication which included (a) direct verbal communication with the ability to ask questions, (b) explanation of medical processes and terminology avoiding jargon, and (c) use of interpretation services for women with limited English proficiency. CONCLUSION: Health organizations varied in their processes for abnormal results communication and availability of support staff and interpretation services. Women who received care from institutions with more robust support staff, such as bilingual navigators, more often than not reported understanding their results and timely abnormal mammogram follow-up. These reports were consistent across women from diverse ethnic groups and suggest the value of organizational support services between an abnormal mammogram and resolution for improving follow-up times and minimizing patient distress.
BACKGROUND: Regular mammogram screening for eligible average risk women has been associated with early detection and reduction of cancer morbidity and mortality. Delayed follow-up and resolution of abnormal mammograms limit early detection efforts and can cause psychological distress and anxiety. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to gain insight from women's narratives into how organizational factors related to communication and coordination of care facilitate or hinder timely follow-up for abnormal mammogram results. DESIGN: We conducted 61 qualitative in-person interviews with women from four race-ethnic groups (African American, Chinese, Latina, and White) in three different healthcare settings (academic, community, and safety-net). PARTICIPANTS: Eligible participants had an abnormal mammogram result requiring breast biopsy documented in the San Francisco Mammography Registry in the previous year. APPROACH: Interview narratives included reflections on experience and suggested improvements to communication and follow-up processes. A grounded theory approach was used to identify themes across interviews. KEY RESULTS:Participants' experiences of follow-up and diagnosis depended largely on communication processes. Twenty-one participants experienced a follow-up delay (> 30 days between index mammogram and biopsy). Organizational factors, which varied across different institutions, played key roles in effective communication which included (a) direct verbal communication with the ability to ask questions, (b) explanation of medical processes and terminology avoiding jargon, and (c) use of interpretation services for women with limited English proficiency. CONCLUSION: Health organizations varied in their processes for abnormal results communication and availability of support staff and interpretation services. Women who received care from institutions with more robust support staff, such as bilingual navigators, more often than not reported understanding their results and timely abnormal mammogram follow-up. These reports were consistent across women from diverse ethnic groups and suggest the value of organizational support services between an abnormal mammogram and resolution for improving follow-up times and minimizing patient distress.
Entities:
Keywords:
abnormal mammogram; delay; facility communication
Authors: Rebecca J Schwei; Sam Del Pozo; Niels Agger-Gupta; Wilma Alvarado-Little; Ann Bagchi; Alice Hm Chen; Lisa Diamond; Francesca Gany; Doreena Wong; Elizabeth A Jacobs Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2015-03-09 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Yamile Molina; Bridgette H Hempstead; Jacci Thompson-Dodd; Shauna Rae Weatherby; Claire Dunbar; Sarah D Hohl; Rachel C Malen; Rachel M Ceballos Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Sanja Percac-Lima; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Anne Marie McCarthy; Sorbarikor Piawah; Steven J Atlas Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Erica T Warner; Rulla M Tamimi; Melissa E Hughes; Rebecca A Ottesen; Yu-Ning Wong; Stephen B Edge; Richard L Theriault; Douglas W Blayney; Joyce C Niland; Eric P Winer; Jane C Weeks; Ann H Partridge Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-10-26 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Anne Elizabeth Glassgow; Yamile Molina; Sage Kim; Richard T Campbell; Julie Darnell; Elizabeth A Calhoun Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2018-06-15