Literature DB >> 26900189

Consensus Statement for the Management and Communication of High Risk Laboratory Results.

Craig Campbell1, Grahame Caldwell2, Penelope Coates3, Robert Flatman4, Andrew Georgiou5, Andrea Rita Horvath6, Que Lam7, Hans Schneider8.   

Abstract

Ineffective test follow-up is a major source of harm for patients around the world. Unreliable communication from medical laboratories (henceforth termed 'laboratories') to clinicians of results that represent critical or significant risk to patients (collectively termed 'high risk results') is a contributing factor to this problem. Throughout Australasia, management practices for such results vary considerably. The recommendations presented in this document are based on best practice derived from the published literature and follow consultation with a wide range of stakeholders. These recommendations were created to harmonise Australasian practices by guiding laboratories in the design and implementation of safe and effective communication procedures for managing high risk results which require timely notification.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26900189      PMCID: PMC4745612     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev        ISSN: 0159-8090


  29 in total

Review 1.  Quality indicators and specifications for the extra-analytical phases in clinical laboratory management.

Authors:  Carmen Ricós; Montserrat García-Victoria; Blanca de la Fuente
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Notifying clients of life-threatening results.

Authors:  H W Kaufman; C Collins
Journal:  MLO Med Lab Obs       Date:  1994-08

3.  An initiative to improve the management of clinically significant test results in a large health care network.

Authors:  Christopher L Roy; Jeffrey M Rothschild; Anand S Dighe; Gordon D Schiff; Erin Graydon-Baker; Jennifer Lenoci-Edwards; Cheryl Dwyer; Ramin Khorasani; Tejal K Gandhi
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2013-11

4.  Meeting regulatory requirements by the use of cell phone text message notification with autoescalation and loop closure for reporting of critical laboratory results.

Authors:  Sharon Saw; Tze Ping Loh; Sophia Bee Leng Ang; James W L Yip; Sunil Kumar Sethi
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Critical value of the clinical laboratory test in Thailand.

Authors:  Kulnaree Sirisali; Sudarat Manochiopinij; Pairoj Leelahakul; Varaporn Ruengrai; Apsorn Sattayakom; Sophon Sirisali
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2010-11

6.  Critical values: ASCP practice parameter. American Society of Clinical Pathologists.

Authors:  K Emancipator
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Is this a critical, panic, alarm, urgent, or markedly abnormal result?

Authors:  Graham H White; Craig A Campbell; Andrea R Horvath
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Improving response to critical laboratory results with automation: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  G J Kuperman; J M Teich; M J Tanasijevic; N Ma'Luf; E Rittenberg; A Jha; J Fiskio; J Winkelman; D W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Survey of critical value reporting and reduction of false-positive critical value results.

Authors:  Anand S Dighe; Jay B Jones; Sue Parham; Kent B Lewandrowski
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.534

10.  Laboratory critical values: automated notification supports effective clinical decision making.

Authors:  Elisa Piva; Michela Pelloso; Laura Penello; Mario Plebani
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.281

View more
  4 in total

1.  Critical laboratory values communication: summary recommendations from available guidelines.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Camilla Mattiuzzi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

2.  An evaluation of adult critical result policies in haematology in a teaching hospital in China.

Authors:  Dagan Yang; Qian Cai; Xinglun Qi; Lili Xu; Yunxian Zhou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-02

3.  Critical Risk Results - An Update on International Initiatives.

Authors:  Q Lam; E Ajzner; C A Campbell; A Young
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2016-02-09

4.  Critical Results Reporting in Portuguese Hospital Laboratories: State-of-the-Art.

Authors:  Dora Vuljanić; Margarida Pereira; Sérgio Santos; Ana Nikler; Vanja Radišić Biljak; Isabel Cachapuz
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2020-06-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.