Literature DB >> 20479910

Learning curves for colonoscopy: a prospective evaluation of gastroenterology fellows at a single center.

Jae Il Chung1, Nayoung Kim, Min Sik Um, Kyung Phil Kang, Donghun Lee, Jong Chun Na, Eun Sil Lee, Yeon Mu Chung, Ji Yeon Won, Kwang Ho Lee, Tek Man Nam, Jung Hun Lee, Hyun Chul Choi, Sang Hyub Lee, Young Soo Park, Jin Hyuk Hwang, Jin-Wook Kim, Sook-Hyang Jeong, Dong Ho Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Colonoscopy training programs and the minimal experience with colonoscopy required to be considered technically competent are not well established. The aim of this study was to determine the colonoscopy learning curves and factors associated with this difficult procedure at a single center.
METHODS: A total of 3,243 colonoscopies were performed by 12 first-year gastroenterology fellows, and various clinical factors were assessed prospectively for 22 months. Acquisition of competence (success rate) was evaluated based on two objective criteria: (i) the adjusted completion rate (>90%) and (ii) cecal intubation time (<20 minutes).
RESULTS: The overall success rate in reaching the cecum in less than 20 minutes was 72.8%. The cecal intubation time was 9.34+/-4.13 minutes (mean+/-SD). Trainees' skill at performing cecal intubation in <20 minutes reached the requisite standard of competence after 200 procedures. Cecal intubation time decreased significantly from 11.3 to 9.4 minutes after 100 procedures and improved continuously thereafter. Female patients and advanced patient age (over 60 years) were associated with prolonged cecal intubation time (>20 minutes). Surgery of the uterus and ovaries was significantly correlated with delayed cecal intubation time, but not after sufficient colonoscopy experience.
CONCLUSIONS: The minimum number of procedures to reach technical competence was 200. The cecal intubation time was longer in female and older patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Fellows; Learning curves

Year:  2010        PMID: 20479910      PMCID: PMC2871602          DOI: 10.5009/gnl.2010.4.1.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut Liver        ISSN: 1976-2283            Impact factor:   4.519


  15 in total

1.  Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  F Citarda; G Tomaselli; R Capocaccia; S Barcherini; M Crespi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Guidelines for credentialing and granting privileges for gastrointestinal endoscopy. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study.

Authors:  Hemant A Shah; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; Therese A Stukel; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  An adequate level of training for technical competence in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter evaluation of the learning curve.

Authors:  Suck-Ho Lee; Il-Kwun Chung; Sun-Joo Kim; Jin-Oh Kim; Bong-Min Ko; Young Hwangbo; Won Ho Kim; Dong Hun Park; Sang Kil Lee; Cheol Hee Park; Il-Hyun Baek; Dong Il Park; Seun-Ja Park; Jeong-Seon Ji; Byung-Ik Jang; Yoon-Tae Jeen; Jeong Eun Shin; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Chang-Soo Eun; Dong Soo Han
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Colonoscopy--how difficult, how painful?

Authors:  T Hull; J M Church
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Factors affecting cecal and ileal intubation time in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ina Zuber-Jerger; Esther Endlicher; Cornelia Maria Gelbmann
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2008-07-15

7.  Factors affecting the technical difficulty of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Se Yong Oh; Chong Il Sohn; In Kyung Sung; Dong Il Park; Mun Su Kang; Tae Woo Yoo; Jung Ho Park; Hong Joo Kim; Yong Kyun Cho; Woo Kyu Jeon; Byung Ik Kim
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug

8.  Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not?

Authors:  J M Church
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Douglas O Faigel; Judith R Logan; Nora Mattek; Jennifer Holub; Glenn Eisen; Cynthia Morris; Robert Smith; Marion Nadel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  20 in total

1.  Simulated Colonoscopy Objective Performance Evaluation (SCOPE): a non-computer-based tool for assessment of endoscopic skills.

Authors:  E M Ritter; T C Cox; K D Trinca; J P Pearl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  An effective instillation method for water-assisted colonoscopy as performed by in-training endoscopists in terms of volume and temperature.

Authors:  Ki-Hyun Ryu; Kyu-Chan Huh; Young-Woo Kang; Young-Woo Choi; Euyi-Hyeog Im; Tae-Hee Lee; Sun-Moon Kim; Yong-Seok Kim; Jae-Hyung Sun
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Colonoscopy procedural skills and training for new beginners.

Authors:  Seung-Hwa Lee; Young-Kyu Park; Duck-Joo Lee; Kwang-Min Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Development of a fundamentals of endoscopic surgery proficiency-based skills curriculum for general surgery residents.

Authors:  Tomoko Mizota; Nicholas E Anton; Elizabeth M Huffman; Michael J Guzman; Frederick Lane; Jennifer N Choi; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy: an evolving treatment for achalasia.

Authors:  Robert Bechara; Haruo Ikeda; Haruhiro Inoue
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Water exchange method for colonoscopy: learning curve of an experienced colonoscopist in a U.S. community practice setting.

Authors:  Leonard S Fischer; Antoinette Lumsden; Felix W Leung
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-01

7.  Interim report of a randomized cross-over study comparing clinical performance of novice trainee endoscopists using conventional air insufflation versus warm water infusion colonoscopy.

Authors:  Catherine Ngo; Joseph W Leung; Surinder K Mann; Cecilia Terrado; Christopher Bowlus; Drew Ingram; Felix W Leung
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-01

8.  Preclinical endoscopic training using a part-task simulator: learning curve assessment and determination of threshold score for advancement to clinical endoscopy.

Authors:  Pichamol Jirapinyo; Wasif M Abidi; Hiroyuki Aihara; Theodore Zaki; Cynthia Tsay; Avlin B Imaeda; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Does immunohistochemical staining have a clinical impact in early gastric cancer conducted endoscopic submucosal dissection?

Authors:  Seong Ran Jeon; Joo Young Cho; Gene Hyun Bok; Tae Hee Lee; Hyun Gun Kim; Won Young Cho; So Young Jin; Yeon Soo Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Predictive factors affecting cecal intubation failure in colonoscopy trainees.

Authors:  Hong-Jun Park; Jin-Heon Hong; Hyun-Soo Kim; Bo-Ra Kim; So-Yeon Park; Ki-Won Jo; Jae-Woo Kim
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.