Literature DB >> 17708264

Factors affecting the technical difficulty of colonoscopy.

Se Yong Oh1, Chong Il Sohn, In Kyung Sung, Dong Il Park, Mun Su Kang, Tae Woo Yoo, Jung Ho Park, Hong Joo Kim, Yong Kyun Cho, Woo Kyu Jeon, Byung Ik Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Colonoscopy is a standard diagnostic tool for screening and surveillance of diseases affecting the colon. Colonoscopy may be painful for patients and difficult for the endoscopist. The aim of this study was to identify the factors affecting the technical difficulty of a colonoscopic examination and to predict potential difficult patients who will undergo colonoscopy.
METHODOLOGY: A total of 646 outpatients were consecutively included in this study. Patient's age and gender, body mass index (BMI), prior surgical history, and the duration and symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) were recorded before the procedure. The quality of bowel preparation, the difficulty of examination reported by the colonoscopist, the degree of patient pain, the degree of pain as reported by an observer, cecal intubation time andcolonoscopic findings were assessed after the procedure.
RESULTS: We evaluated the difficulty of colonoscopy by cecal intubation time. Advanced age (>50 years), female gender, low BMI (< or = 23 Kg/m2), poor bowel preparation, prior surgical history, patient pain and the presence of IBS were associated with prolonged cecal intubation time. A multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that advanced age, female gender, low BMI, poor bowel preparation and patient pain were independent factors related to prolonged cecal intubation time.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced age, female gender and low BMI, information that colonoscopy may be difficult and painful should be provided. If a colonoscopy is not absolutely indicated, barium enema or CT colonography may be performed as alternative diagnostic modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17708264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  14 in total

1.  Learning curves for colonoscopy: a prospective evaluation of gastroenterology fellows at a single center.

Authors:  Jae Il Chung; Nayoung Kim; Min Sik Um; Kyung Phil Kang; Donghun Lee; Jong Chun Na; Eun Sil Lee; Yeon Mu Chung; Ji Yeon Won; Kwang Ho Lee; Tek Man Nam; Jung Hun Lee; Hyun Chul Choi; Sang Hyub Lee; Young Soo Park; Jin Hyuk Hwang; Jin-Wook Kim; Sook-Hyang Jeong; Dong Ho Lee
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.519

2.  Does use of a colonoscopy imaging device improve performance? A cohort study.

Authors:  James J Wood; Christopher J W Foy; Roland Valori; Michelle E Lucarotti; Aidan L Fowler; Kevin Dowler; Timothy A Cook
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Optical measurement of rectal microvasculature as an adjunct to flexible sigmoidosocopy: gender-specific implications.

Authors:  Hemant K Roy; Andrew J Gomes; Sarah Ruderman; Laura K Bianchi; Michael J Goldberg; Valentina Stoyneva; Jeremy D Rogers; Vladimir Turzhitsky; Young Kim; Eugene Yen; Mohammed Jameel; Andrej Bogojevic; Vadim Backman
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-06-22

4.  Risk factors for delayed postpolypectomy bleeding: how to minimize your patients' risk.

Authors:  Xian-rui Wu; James M Church; Awad Jarrar; Jennifer Liang; Matthew F Kalady
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Impact of obesity on bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Brian B Borg; Nitin K Gupta; Gary R Zuckerman; Bhaskar Banerjee; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  The water method is effective in difficult colonoscopy - it enhances cecal intubation in unsedated patients with a history of abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Felix W Leung; Surinder K Mann; Joseph W Leung; Rodelei M Siao-Salera; Jackson Guy
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-01

7.  Evidence to suggest adoption of water exchange deserves broader consideration: Its pain alleviating impact occurs in 90% of investigators.

Authors:  Sergio Cadoni; Mauro Liggi; Premysl Falt; Stefano Sanna; Mariangela Argiolas; Viviana Fanari; Paolo Gallittu; Donatella Mura; Maria L Porcedda; Vit Smajstrla; Matteo Erriu; Felix W Leung
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-01-25

8.  Can Water Exchange Improve Patient Tolerance in Unsedated Colonoscopy A Prospective Comparative Study.

Authors:  Richard Azevedo; Cátia Leitão; João Pinto; Helena Ribeiro; Flávio Pereira; Ana Caldeira; António Banhudo
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-16

9.  Effects of body mass index on cecal intubation time in women.

Authors:  Banu Karapolat; Üzer Küçüktülü
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2018-07-01

10.  Factors of incomplete colonoscopy for stenosing colorectal cancer: CT colonography features.

Authors:  Daisuke Tsurumaru; Yusuke Nishimuta; Satohiro Kai; Eiji Oki; Akihiro Nishie
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.374

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.