Literature DB >> 18604482

Factors affecting cecal and ileal intubation time in colonoscopy.

Ina Zuber-Jerger1, Esther Endlicher, Cornelia Maria Gelbmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The time required for a colonoscopy must be justified under economic aspects. The objective of this study was to analyze patient- and staff-related factors influencing the time for cecal and ileal intubation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was performed on 500 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy in 2005. The authors analyzed patient age, gender, height, weight, surgical history, the presence of liver cirrhosis and splenomegaly, the number of children given birth, the presence of colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease, the quality of bowel preparation, sedation, and the experience of the attending colonoscopist, the nurse and the team as factors of possible relevance to cecal and ileal intubation time.
RESULTS: The cecum was reached in 495/500 examinations (99%). Intubation of terminal ileum was possible in 477/500 patients (96%). Mean cecal and ileal intubation times were 10.5+/-10.2 min and 6.4+/-7.9 min, respectively. Time to cecal intubation was related to the experience of the endoscopist (p=0.009), the nurse (p=0.04) and the whole team (p=0.002), as well as to an adequate cleaning of the bowel (p=0.01).
CONCLUSION: A short intubation time requires experienced staff in combination with an adequate cleaning of the bowel without reference to biological or pathologic factors except for colon-shortening surgery. The gain in examination quality by inspecting the terminal ileum comes to the cost of a prolongation of insertion time of 25-30% in experienced hands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18604482     DOI: 10.1007/s00063-008-1071-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)        ISSN: 0723-5003


  8 in total

1.  Factors affecting colonoscope insertion time in patients with or without a colostomy after left-sided colorectal resection.

Authors:  Hui Won Jang; Yoon Nam Kim; Chung Mo Nam; Hyun Jung Lee; Soo Jung Park; Sung Pil Hong; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim; Jae Hee Cheon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Learning curves for colonoscopy: a prospective evaluation of gastroenterology fellows at a single center.

Authors:  Jae Il Chung; Nayoung Kim; Min Sik Um; Kyung Phil Kang; Donghun Lee; Jong Chun Na; Eun Sil Lee; Yeon Mu Chung; Ji Yeon Won; Kwang Ho Lee; Tek Man Nam; Jung Hun Lee; Hyun Chul Choi; Sang Hyub Lee; Young Soo Park; Jin Hyuk Hwang; Jin-Wook Kim; Sook-Hyang Jeong; Dong Ho Lee
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.519

3.  Factors affecting insertion time for colonoscopy performed under intramuscular analgesia in patients with history of colorectal resection.

Authors:  Hui Won Jang; Jae Hee Cheon; Chung Mo Nam; Chang Mo Moon; Jin Ha Lee; Soung Min Jeon; Jae Jun Park; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  What Is the Mean Procedure Time to Optimize Colonoscopy?

Authors:  Taehyun Kim; Beom Jae Lee
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2016-11-29

5.  Predictors for difficult cecal insertion in colonoscopy: The impact of obesity indices.

Authors:  Soo Yun Moon; Byung Chang Kim; Dae Kyung Sohn; Kyung Su Han; Bun Kim; Chang Won Hong; Bum Joon Park; Kum Hei Ryu; Ji Hyung Nam
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Clinical Yield of Ileal Intubation During Screening Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Amer A Alkhatib; Shiva Kumar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-02

7.  Impact of pediatric versus adult colonoscope on terminal ileum intubation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Amer A Alkhatib; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Shiva Kumar
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-02-21

8.  A randomized controlled trial of comparison on time and rate of cecal and termianl Ileal intubation according to adult-colonoscope length: intermediate versus long.

Authors:  Kwang-Min Kim; Seung-Hwa Lee; Duck-Joo Lee; Kyu-Nam Kim; Sang-Wook Seo; Hyung-Suk Lee; Dong-Ryul Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 2.153

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.