Literature DB >> 20473753

Disruption of cutaneous feedback alters magnitude but not direction of muscle responses to postural perturbations in the decerebrate cat.

Claire F Honeycutt1, T Richard Nichols.   

Abstract

Quadrupeds and bipeds respond to horizontal perturbations of the support surface with muscular responses that are broadly tuned and directionally sensitive. Since the discovery of this directional sensitivity, interest has turned toward the critical sensory systems necessary to generate these responses. We hypothesize that cutaneous feedback affects the magnitude of muscle responses to postural perturbation but has little effect on the directionality of the muscle response. We developed a modified premammillary decerebrate cat preparation to evaluate the sensory mechanisms driving this directionally sensitive muscle activation in response to support surface perturbation. This preparation allows us the flexibility to isolate the proprioceptive (cutaneous and muscle receptors) system from other sensory influences. We found that loss of cutaneous feedback leads to a significant loss in background activity causing a smaller muscular response to horizontal perturbations. However, the directional properties of the muscular responses remained intact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20473753      PMCID: PMC3760171          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2281-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Local loss of proprioception results in disruption of interjoint coordination during locomotion in the cat.

Authors:  T A Abelew; M D Miller; T C Cope; T R Nichols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Ratio of shear to load ground-reaction force may underlie the directional tuning of the automatic postural response to rotation and translation.

Authors:  Lena H Ting; Jane M Macpherson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Is lower leg proprioception essential for triggering human automatic postural responses?

Authors:  B R Bloem; J H Allum; M G Carpenter; F Honegger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Evidence for strong synaptic coupling between single tactile afferents from the sole of the foot and motoneurons supplying leg muscles.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Leah R Bent; Penelope A McNulty; Vaughan G Macefield
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Central suppression of regenerated proprioceptive afferents.

Authors:  Valerie K Haftel; Edyta K Bichler; Qing-Bo Wang; Jonathan F Prather; Martin J Pinter; Timothy C Cope
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Electromyographic responses from the hindlimb muscles of the decerebrate cat to horizontal support surface perturbations.

Authors:  Claire F Honeycutt; Jinger S Gottschall; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Strategies that simplify the control of quadrupedal stance. I. Forces at the ground.

Authors:  J M Macpherson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Sensorimotor control of knee stability. A review.

Authors:  M Solomonow; M Krogsgaard
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.221

9.  Group I projections from intrinsic foot muscles to motoneurones of leg and thigh muscles in humans.

Authors:  P Marque; G Nicolas; V Marchand-Pauvert; J Gautier; M Simonetta-Moreau; E Pierrot-Deseilligny
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Influence of stimulus parameters on human postural responses.

Authors:  H C Diener; F B Horak; L M Nashner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  10 in total

1.  Task-level feedback can explain temporal recruitment of spatially fixed muscle synergies throughout postural perturbations.

Authors:  Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Muscle spindle responses to horizontal support surface perturbation in the anesthetized cat: insights into the role of autogenic feedback in whole body postural control.

Authors:  Claire F Honeycutt; Paul Nardelli; Timothy C Cope; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The mechanical actions of muscles predict the direction of muscle activation during postural perturbations in the cat hindlimb.

Authors:  Claire F Honeycutt; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neural mechanisms of single corrective steps evoked in the standing rabbit.

Authors:  L-J Hsu; P V Zelenin; V F Lyalka; M G Vemula; G N Orlovsky; T G Deliagina
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-02-12       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Cutaneous sensory feedback from paw pads affects lateral balance control during split-belt locomotion in the cat.

Authors:  Hangue Park; Elizaveta M Latash; Yaroslav I Molkov; Alexander N Klishko; Alain Frigon; Stephen P DeWeerth; Boris I Prilutsky
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 6.  Physiological and circuit mechanisms of postural control.

Authors:  Tatiana G Deliagina; Pavel V Zelenin; Grigori N Orlovsky
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 7.  Distributed force feedback in the spinal cord and the regulation of limb mechanics.

Authors:  T Richard Nichols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Control of Mammalian Locomotion by Somatosensory Feedback.

Authors:  Alain Frigon; Turgay Akay; Boris I Prilutsky
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 8.915

Review 9.  Relative Contribution of Proprioceptive and Vestibular Sensory Systems to Locomotion: Opportunities for Discovery in the Age of Molecular Science.

Authors:  Turgay Akay; Andrew J Murray
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Time Window of Perturbation-Induced Response Triggered by Ankle Motion and Body Sway above the Ankle.

Authors:  Koichi Hiraoka; Toru Kuramitsu; Naoki Nii; Miyuki Osumi; Nana Tanaka
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-04-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.