Literature DB >> 3404210

Influence of stimulus parameters on human postural responses.

H C Diener1, F B Horak, L M Nashner.   

Abstract

1. The role of sensory information in shaping muscle activation patterns to postural perturbations in humans was investigated by varying velocity, amplitude, or duration of the perturbing stimulus. Ten normal subjects were exposed to 120 backward translations of the support surface under conditions of varying velocities (10-35 cm/s, constant amplitude), varying amplitudes (1.2-12 cm, constant velocity), or varying durations (40-800 ms). The effects of perturbation parameters on movement kinematics and EMG latencies, patterns, and integrated areas in six trunk and leg muscles were examined. Integrated EMG activity was normalized across subjects and the early (first 75 ms), middle (second 75 ms), and late (last 350 ms) components were analyzed separately. 2. Ankle, knee, and hip angle trajectories and surface reactive forces suggest that a relatively consistent movement strategy was scaled to the perturbation velocities and amplitudes applied. 3. Short-duration perturbations (75 ms) evoked a single burst of muscle activity (75-100 ms duration) in gastrocnemius, hamstrings, paraspinal, and rectus abdominis muscles at latencies too long to be explained by simple stretch reflexes. EMG latencies, patterns, and integrated areas were independent of the velocity and amplitude of the short-duration perturbations, suggesting a minimal time to incorporate peripheral velocity information into the triggered response. 4. For translations lasting longer than 75 ms, the integrated areas of the early agonist EMG bursts were positively correlated with stimulus velocity. The integrated area of later, more tonic EMG components were best correlated with stimulus amplitude. These relationships were found in both distal (stretched) muscles and in proximal muscles. Absolute latencies (94-145 ms), intersegmental latencies (18-29 ms), and burst durations (75-100 ms) were not influenced by the velocity or amplitude of the stimulus. 5. These results suggest that the spatial and temporal organization of automatic postural responses may be organized independently of response intensity. Within a particular spatial-temporal pattern, the amount of muscle activation appears to be adjusted by sensory information, which specifies velocity and amplitude of the perturbation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3404210     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1988.59.6.1888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  72 in total

1.  Effects of light fingertip touch on postural responses in subjects with diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  R Dickstein; R J Peterka; F B Horak
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Postural muscle activity during bilateral and unilateral arm movements at different speeds.

Authors:  G Mochizuki; T D Ivanova; S J Garland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effect of knee joint laxity on long-loop postural reflexes: evidence for a human capsular-hamstring reflex.

Authors:  R P Di Fabio; B Graf; M B Badke; A Breunig; K Jensen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Muscle spindle responses to horizontal support surface perturbation in the anesthetized cat: insights into the role of autogenic feedback in whole body postural control.

Authors:  Claire F Honeycutt; Paul Nardelli; Timothy C Cope; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Long-latency muscle activity reflects continuous, delayed sensorimotor feedback of task-level and not joint-level error.

Authors:  Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Time to disengage: holding an object influences the execution of rapid compensatory reach-to-grasp reactions for recovery from whole-body instability.

Authors:  K Van Ooteghem; B Lakhani; S Akram; V Miyasike Da Silva; W E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Somatosensory control of precision grip during unpredictable pulling loads. I. Changes in load force amplitude.

Authors:  R S Johansson; R Riso; C Häger; L Bäckström
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Deceleration affects anticipatory and reactive components of triggered postural responses.

Authors:  Mark G Carpenter; Alf Thorstensson; Andrew G Cresswell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Cortical control of postural responses.

Authors:  J V Jacobs; F B Horak
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Different activations of the soleus and gastrocnemii muscles in response to various types of stance perturbation in man.

Authors:  A Nardone; T Corrà; M Schieppati
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.