Literature DB >> 31308054

Cutaneous sensory feedback from paw pads affects lateral balance control during split-belt locomotion in the cat.

Hangue Park1,2, Elizaveta M Latash3, Yaroslav I Molkov3, Alexander N Klishko2, Alain Frigon4, Stephen P DeWeerth1,5, Boris I Prilutsky6.   

Abstract

Cutaneous sensory feedback from the paw pads plays an important role in regulating body balance, especially in challenging environments like ladder or slope walking. Here, we investigated the contribution of cutaneous sensory feedback from the paw pads to balance control in cats stepping on a split-belt treadmill. Forepaws and hindpaws were anesthetized unilaterally using lidocaine injections. We evaluated body balance in intact and compromised cutaneous feedback conditions during split-belt locomotion with belt-speed ratios of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0. Measures of body balance included step width, relative duration of limb support phases, lateral bias of center of mass (CoM) and margins of static and dynamic stability. In the intact condition, static and dynamic balance declined with increasing belt-speed ratio as a result of a lateral shift of the CoM toward the borders of support on the slower moving belt. Anesthesia of the ipsilateral paws improved locomotor balance with increasing belt-speed ratios by reversing the CoM shift, decreasing the relative duration of the two-limb support phase, increasing the duration of four- or three-limb support phases, and increasing the hindlimb step width and static stability. We observed no changes in most balance measures in anesthetized conditions during tied-belt locomotion at 0.4 m s-1 CoM lateral displacements closely resembled those of the inverted pendulum and of human walking. We propose that unilaterally compromised cutaneous feedback from the paw pads is compensated for by improving lateral balance and by shifting the body toward the anesthetized paws to increase tactile sensation during the stance phase.
© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Center of mass; Dynamic stability; Inverted pendulum; Quadruped; Tactile sensation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31308054      PMCID: PMC6679349          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.198648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  34 in total

1.  Penguin waddling is not wasteful.

Authors:  T M Griffin; R Kram
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000 Dec 21-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The condition for dynamic stability.

Authors:  A L Hof; M G J Gazendam; W E Sinke
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Quantification of motor cortex activity and full-body biomechanics during unconstrained locomotion.

Authors:  Boris I Prilutsky; Mikhail G Sirota; Robert J Gregor; Irina N Beloozerova
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Control of lateral balance in walking. Experimental findings in normal subjects and above-knee amputees.

Authors:  At L Hof; Renske M van Bockel; Tanneke Schoppen; Klaas Postema
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Contribution of cutaneous inputs from the hindpaw to the control of locomotion. I. Intact cats.

Authors:  L J G Bouyer; S Rossignol
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Disruption of cutaneous feedback alters magnitude but not direction of muscle responses to postural perturbations in the decerebrate cat.

Authors:  Claire F Honeycutt; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Contribution of hindpaw cutaneous inputs to the control of lateral stability during walking in the cat.

Authors:  D A E Bolton; J E Misiaszek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  What functions do reflexes serve during human locomotion?

Authors:  E P Zehr; R B Stein
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.685

9.  Automatic postural responses are delayed by pyridoxine-induced somatosensory loss.

Authors:  Paul J Stapley; Lena H Ting; Manuel Hulliger; Jane M Macpherson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The effects of digital anesthesia on force control using a precision grip.

Authors:  Joël Monzée; Yves Lamarre; Allan M Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  6 in total

1.  Frontal plane dynamics of the centre of mass during quadrupedal locomotion on a split-belt treadmill.

Authors:  E M Latash; W H Barnett; H Park; J M Rider; A N Klishko; B I Prilutsky; Y I Molkov
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Common and distinct muscle synergies during level and slope locomotion in the cat.

Authors:  Alexander N Klishko; Adil Akyildiz; Ricky Mehta-Desai; Boris I Prilutsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.974

Review 3.  Relative Contribution of Proprioceptive and Vestibular Sensory Systems to Locomotion: Opportunities for Discovery in the Age of Molecular Science.

Authors:  Turgay Akay; Andrew J Murray
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  The Role of Muscle Spindle Feedback in the Guidance of Hindlimb Movement by the Ipsilateral Forelimb during Locomotion in Mice.

Authors:  William P Mayer; Turgay Akay
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-12-02

5.  Chemogenetic modulation of sensory afferents induces locomotor changes and plasticity after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jaclyn T Eisdorfer; Hannah Sobotka-Briner; Susan Schramfield; George Moukarzel; Jie Chen; Thomas J Campion; Rupert Smit; Bradley C Rauscher; Michel A Lemay; George M Smith; Andrew J Spence
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 6.261

6.  On the Organization of the Locomotor CPG: Insights From Split-Belt Locomotion and Mathematical Modeling.

Authors:  Elizaveta M Latash; Charly G Lecomte; Simon M Danner; Alain Frigon; Ilya A Rybak; Yaroslav I Molkov
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.