Literature DB >> 20473512

Difference between random and imprinted X inactivation in common voles.

Elena V Dementyeva1, Alexander I Shevchenko, Olga V Anopriyenko, Nina A Mazurok, Eugeny A Elisaphenko, Tatyana B Nesterova, Neil Brockdorff, Suren M Zakian.   

Abstract

During early development in female mammals, most genes on one of the two X-chromosomes undergo transcriptional silencing. In the extraembryonic lineages of some eutherian species, imprinted X-inactivation of the paternal X-chromosome occurs. In the cells of the embryo proper, the choice of the future inactive X-chromosome is random. We mapped several genes on the X-chromosomes of five common vole species and compared their expression and methylation patterns in somatic and extraembryonic tissues, where random and imprinted X-inactivation occurs, respectively. In extraembryonic tissues, more genes were expressed on the inactive X-chromosome than in somatic tissues. We also found that the methylation status of the X-linked genes was always in accordance with their expression pattern in somatic, but not in extraembryonic tissues. The data provide new evidence that imprinted X-inactivation is less complete and/or stable than the random form and DNA methylation contributes less to its maintenance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20473512     DOI: 10.1007/s00412-010-0277-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  64 in total

1.  Chromosomal domains and escape from X inactivation: comparative X inactivation analysis in mouse and human.

Authors:  K D Tsuchiya; H F Willard
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.957

2.  Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development.

Authors:  Ikuhiro Okamoto; Arie P Otte; C David Allis; Danny Reinberg; Edith Heard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Reactivation of the paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos.

Authors:  Winifred Mak; Tatyana B Nesterova; Mariana de Napoles; Ruth Appanah; Shinya Yamanaka; Arie P Otte; Neil Brockdorff
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  [Extraembryonic endoderm stem cell lines from common voles of the genus Microtus].

Authors:  A I Shevchenko; V V Demina; N A Mazurok; A I Zhelezova; Ia R Efremov; a G Shilov; A I Shevela; A V Belevantseva; V V Vlasov; S M Zakiian
Journal:  Genetika       Date:  2008-11

5.  Late DNA replication in the paternally derived X chromosome of female kangaroos.

Authors:  G B Sharman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-03-26       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females.

Authors:  Laura Carrel; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  A short pseudoautosomal region in laboratory mice.

Authors:  J Perry; S Palmer; A Gabriel; A Ashworth
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Human and mouse SYBL1 gene structure and expression.

Authors:  M R Matarazzo; M Cuccurese; M Strazzullo; M Vacca; A Curci; M G Miano; M Cocchia; G Mercadante; A Torino; M D'Urso; A Ciccodicola; M D'Esposito
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 3.688

9.  X inactivation analysis and DNA methylation studies of the ubiquitin activating enzyme E1 and PCTAIRE-1 genes in human and mouse.

Authors:  L Carrel; C M Clemson; J M Dunn; A P Miller; P A Hunt; J B Lawrence; H F Willard
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Parental imprinting studied by allele-specific primer extension after PCR: paternal X chromosome-linked genes are transcribed prior to preferential paternal X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  J Singer-Sam; V Chapman; J M LeBon; A D Riggs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  8 in total

1.  Constitutive heterochromatin propagation contributes to the X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Alexander I Shevchenko; Nikita A Rifel; Suren M Zakian; Irina S Zakharova
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.620

2.  Impact of Xist RNA on chromatin modifications and transcriptional silencing maintenance at different stages of imprinted X chromosome inactivation in vole Microtus levis.

Authors:  Alexander I Shevchenko; Elena V Grigor'eva; Sergey P Medvedev; Irina S Zakharova; Elena V Dementyeva; Eugeny A Elisaphenko; Anastasia A Malakhova; Sophia V Pavlova; Suren M Zakian
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 3.  Sex-Specific Placental Responses in Fetal Development.

Authors:  Cheryl S Rosenfeld
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.736

4.  A regulatory potential of the Xist gene promoter in vole M. rossiaemeridionalis.

Authors:  Konstantin E Orishchenko; Sophia V Pavlova; Eugeny A Elisaphenko; Vladimir V Sherstyuk; Alexander V Prinz; Alexander I Shevchenko; Elena V Dementyeva; Suren M Zakian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Variability of sequence surrounding the Xist gene in rodents suggests taxon-specific regulation of X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Alexander I Shevchenko; Anastasia A Malakhova; Eugeny A Elisaphenko; Nina A Mazurok; Tatyana B Nesterova; Neil Brockdorff; Suren M Zakian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Dynamics of the two heterochromatin types during imprinted X chromosome inactivation in vole Microtus levis.

Authors:  Evgeniya A Vaskova; Elena V Dementyeva; Alexander I Shevchenko; Sophia V Pavlova; Elena V Grigor'eva; Antonina I Zhelezova; John L Vandeberg; Suren M Zakian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Placental contribution to the origins of sexual dimorphism in health and diseases: sex chromosomes and epigenetics.

Authors:  Anne Gabory; Tessa J Roseboom; Tom Moore; Lorna G Moore; Claudine Junien
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.027

8.  Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells of Microtus levis x Microtus arvalis Vole Hybrids: Conditions Necessary for Their Generation and Self-Renewal.

Authors:  E V Grigor'eva; A I Shevchenko; S P Medvedev; N A Mazurok; A I Zhelezova; S M Zakian
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.845

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.