Literature DB >> 35920963

Constitutive heterochromatin propagation contributes to the X chromosome inactivation.

Alexander I Shevchenko1,2,3, Nikita A Rifel1, Suren M Zakian1,2,3, Irina S Zakharova4,5,6.   

Abstract

Imprinted X chromosome inactivation (iXCI) balances the expression of X-linked genes in preimplantation embryos and extraembryonic tissues in rodents. Long noncoding Xist RNA drives iXCI, silencing genes and recruiting Xist-dependent chromatin repressors. Some domains on the inactive X chromosome include repressive modifications specific to constitutive heterochromatin, which show no direct link to Xist RNA. We explored the relationship between Xist RNA and chromatin silencing during iXCI in vole Microtus levis. We performed locus-specific activation of Xist transcription on the only active X chromosome using the dCas9-SAM system in XO vole trophoblast stem cells (TSCs), which allow modeling iXCI events to some extent. The artificially activated endogenous vole Xist transcript is truncated and restricted ~ 6.6 kb of the exon 1. Ectopic Xist RNA accumulates on the X chromosome and recruits Xist-dependent modifications during TSC differentiation, yet is incapable by itself repressing X-linked genes. Transcriptional silencing occurs upon ectopic Xist upregulation only when repressive marks spread from the massive telomeric constitutive heterochromatin to the X chromosome region containing genes. We hypothesize that the Xist RNA-induced propagation of repressive marks from the constitutive heterochromatin could be a mechanism involved in X chromosome inactivation.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heterochromatin; Histone modifications; Imprinted X chromosome inactivation; Vole; Xist

Year:  2022        PMID: 35920963     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-022-09706-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   4.620


  51 in total

1.  Characterization of a murine gene expressed from the inactive X chromosome.

Authors:  G Borsani; R Tonlorenzi; M C Simmler; L Dandolo; D Arnaud; V Capra; M Grompe; A Pizzuti; D Muzny; C Lawrence; H F Willard; P Avner; A Ballabio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Polycomb group proteins Ring1A/B link ubiquitylation of histone H2A to heritable gene silencing and X inactivation.

Authors:  Mariana de Napoles; Jacqueline E Mermoud; Rika Wakao; Y Amy Tang; Mitusuhiro Endoh; Ruth Appanah; Tatyana B Nesterova; Jose Silva; Arie P Otte; Miguel Vidal; Haruhiko Koseki; Neil Brockdorff
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 3.  Position-effect variegation, heterochromatin formation, and gene silencing in Drosophila.

Authors:  Sarah C R Elgin; Gunter Reuter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Difference between random and imprinted X inactivation in common voles.

Authors:  Elena V Dementyeva; Alexander I Shevchenko; Olga V Anopriyenko; Nina A Mazurok; Eugeny A Elisaphenko; Tatyana B Nesterova; Neil Brockdorff; Suren M Zakian
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Spatial distribution of histone isoforms on the bovine active and inactive X chromosomes.

Authors:  G Coppola; A Pinton; E M Joudrey; P K Basrur; W A King
Journal:  Sex Dev       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 1.824

6.  Xist Deletional Analysis Reveals an Interdependency between Xist RNA and Polycomb Complexes for Spreading along the Inactive X.

Authors:  David Colognori; Hongjae Sunwoo; Andrea J Kriz; Chen-Yu Wang; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Multiple spatially distinct types of facultative heterochromatin on the human inactive X chromosome.

Authors:  Brian P Chadwick; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Site-specific silencing of regulatory elements as a mechanism of X inactivation.

Authors:  J Mauro Calabrese; Wei Sun; Lingyun Song; Joshua W Mugford; Lucy Williams; Della Yee; Joshua Starmer; Piotr Mieczkowski; Gregory E Crawford; Terry Magnuson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Xist-dependent imprinted X inactivation and the early developmental consequences of its failure.

Authors:  Maud Borensztein; Laurène Syx; Katia Ancelin; Patricia Diabangouaya; Christel Picard; Tao Liu; Jun-Bin Liang; Ivaylo Vassilev; Rafael Galupa; Nicolas Servant; Emmanuel Barillot; Azim Surani; Chong-Jian Chen; Edith Heard
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 15.369

10.  Bipartite structure of the inactive mouse X chromosome.

Authors:  Xinxian Deng; Wenxiu Ma; Vijay Ramani; Andrew Hill; Fan Yang; Ferhat Ay; Joel B Berletch; Carl Anthony Blau; Jay Shendure; Zhijun Duan; William S Noble; Christine M Disteche
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.