Literature DB >> 15982133

Look here but ignore what you see: effects of distractors at fixation.

Diane M Beck1, Nilli Lavie.   

Abstract

Distractor interference effects were compared between distractors in the periphery and those placed at fixation. In 6 experiments, the authors show that fixation distractors produce larger interference effects than peripheral distractors. However, the fixation distractor effects are modulated by perceptual load to the same extent as are peripheral distractor effects (Experiments 1 and 2). Experiment 3 showed that fixation distractors are harder to filter out than peripheral distractors. The larger distractor effects at fixation are not due to the cortical magnification of foveal stimuli (Experiments 4 and 5), nor can they be attributed to cuing by the fixation point (Experiment 2), the lower predictability or greater location certainty of fixation distractors (Experiment 5), or their being in a central position (Experiment 6). The authors suggest that preferential access to attention renders fixation distractors harder to ignore than peripheral distractors. ((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15982133     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  41 in total

1.  Controlling for dilution while manipulating load: perceptual and sensory limitations are just two aspects of task difficulty.

Authors:  Hanna Benoni; Yehoshua Tsal
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

Review 2.  Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?

Authors:  Gillian Murphy; John A Groeger; Ciara M Greene
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

3.  Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.

Authors:  Rajwant Sandhu; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Hand posture and cognitive control: The congruency sequence effect is reduced near the hands.

Authors:  Julia Englert; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

5.  Foveal Processing Under Concurrent Peripheral Load in Profoundly Deaf Adults.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2015-12-10

6.  Effect of action video games on the spatial distribution of visuospatial attention.

Authors:  C Shawn Green; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The impact of Degraded distractors on (Nondegraded) target identification.

Authors:  Ada Kritikos; Alexia Pavlis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Modulation of nicotine effects on selective attention by DRD2 and CHRNA4 gene polymorphisms.

Authors:  Stefan Ahrens; Sebastian Markett; Thomas P K Breckel; Oliver Behler; Martin Reuter; Christiane M Thiel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  The role of perceptual load in object recognition.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Zhicheng Lin; Nahid Zokaei; Volker Thoma
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Load induced blindness.

Authors:  James S P Macdonald; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.