Literature DB >> 20462319

Beauty and the beholder: highly individual taste for abstract, but not real-world images.

Edward A Vessel1, Nava Rubin.   

Abstract

How individual are visual preferences? For real-world scenes, there is high agreement in observer's preference ratings. This could be driven by visual attributes of the images but also by non-visual associations, since those are common to most individuals. To investigate this, we developed a set of novel abstract, visually diverse images. At the individual observer level both abstract and real-world images yielded robust and consistent visual preferences, and yet abstract images yielded much lower across observer agreement in preferences than did real-world images. This suggests that visual preferences are typically driven by the semantic content of stimuli, and that shared semantic interpretations then lead to shared preferences. Further experiments showed that highly individual preferences can nevertheless emerge also for real-world scenes, in contexts which de-emphasize their semantic associations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20462319      PMCID: PMC3662030          DOI: 10.1167/10.2.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  26 in total

1.  Facial attractiveness.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Joint comment on "when does duration matter in judgment and decision making?" (Ariely & Loewenstein, 2000).

Authors:  D Ariely; D Kahneman; G Loewenstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-12

3.  Effort after meaning and the hedonic value of paintings.

Authors:  Phil A Russell
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2003-02

4.  Beauty is in the 'we' of the beholder: greater agreement on facial attractiveness among close relations.

Authors:  P Matthew Bronstad; Richard Russell
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Humans prefer curved visual objects.

Authors:  Moshe Bar; Maital Neta
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-08

7.  Innate and learned components of human visual preference.

Authors:  I Rentschler; M Jüttner; A Unzicker; T Landis
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  The category effect with rating scales: number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation.

Authors:  A Parducci; D H Wedell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The aesthetics of simple figures.

Authors:  I C McManus
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1980-11

10.  Preferences for visual stimuli following amygdala damage.

Authors:  R Adolphs; D Tranel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  37 in total

1.  Ventromedial Frontal Lobe Damage Alters how Specific Attributes are Weighed in Subjective Valuation.

Authors:  Avinash R Vaidya; Marcus Sefranek; Lesley K Fellows
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Listening to birdsong reveals basic features of rate perception and aesthetic judgements.

Authors:  Tina Roeske; Pauline Larrouy-Maestri; Yasuhiro Sakamoto; David Poeppel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The pleasure of art as a matter of fact.

Authors:  Marcos Nadal; Martin Skov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The default-mode network represents aesthetic appeal that generalizes across visual domains.

Authors:  Edward A Vessel; Ayse Ilkay Isik; Amy M Belfi; Jonathan L Stahl; G Gabrielle Starr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Individual Aesthetic Preferences for Faces Are Shaped Mostly by Environments, Not Genes.

Authors:  Laura Germine; Richard Russell; P Matthew Bronstad; Gabriëlla A M Blokland; Jordan W Smoller; Holum Kwok; Samuel E Anthony; Ken Nakayama; Gillian Rhodes; Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Aesthetic preference for art can be predicted from a mixture of low- and high-level visual features.

Authors:  Kiyohito Iigaya; Sanghyun Yi; Iman A Wahle; Koranis Tanwisuth; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-05-20

7.  Cognitive mechanisms for explaining dynamics of aesthetic appreciation.

Authors:  Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-11-01

8.  Aesthetic valence of visual illusions.

Authors:  Jasmina Stevanov; Slobodan Marković; Akiyoshi Kitaoka
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-02-29

9.  Stochasticity, Nonlinear Value Functions, and Update Rules in Learning Aesthetic Biases.

Authors:  Norberto M Grzywacz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Shape familiarity modulates preference for curvature in drawings of common-use objects.

Authors:  Erick G Chuquichambi; Letizia Palumbo; Carlos Rey; Enric Munar
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.