Literature DB >> 18265847

Beauty is in the 'we' of the beholder: greater agreement on facial attractiveness among close relations.

P Matthew Bronstad1, Richard Russell.   

Abstract

Scientific research on facial attractiveness has focused primarily on elucidating universal factors to which all raters respond consistently. However, recent work has shown that there is also substantial disagreement between raters, highlighting the importance of determining how attractiveness preferences vary among different individuals. We conducted a typical attractiveness ratings study, but took the unusual step of recruiting pairs of subjects who were spouses, siblings, or close friends. The agreement between pairs of affiliated friends, siblings, and spouses was significantly greater than between pairs of strangers drawn from the same race and culture, providing evidence that facial-attractiveness preferences are socially organized.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18265847     DOI: 10.1068/p5793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  14 in total

1.  Older and younger adults' first impressions from faces: similar in agreement but different in positivity.

Authors:  Leslie A Zebrowitz; Robert G Franklin; Suzanne Hillman; Henry Boc
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-12-31

2.  Beauty and the beholder: highly individual taste for abstract, but not real-world images.

Authors:  Edward A Vessel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Crossing the 'uncanny valley': adaptation to cartoon faces can influence perception of human faces.

Authors:  Haiwen Chen; Richard Russell; Ken Nakayama; Margaret Livingstone
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Neural responses to cartoon facial attractiveness: An event-related potential study.

Authors:  Yingjun Lu; Jingmei Wang; Ling Wang; Junli Wang; Jinliang Qin
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 5.203

5.  Individual Aesthetic Preferences for Faces Are Shaped Mostly by Environments, Not Genes.

Authors:  Laura Germine; Richard Russell; P Matthew Bronstad; Gabriëlla A M Blokland; Jordan W Smoller; Holum Kwok; Samuel E Anthony; Ken Nakayama; Gillian Rhodes; Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 6.  Art reaches within: aesthetic experience, the self and the default mode network.

Authors:  Edward A Vessel; G Gabrielle Starr; Nava Rubin
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Brain responses to facial attractiveness induced by facial proportions: evidence from an fMRI study.

Authors:  Hui Shen; Desmond K P Chau; Jianpo Su; Ling-Li Zeng; Weixiong Jiang; Jufang He; Jintu Fan; Dewen Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Inter-rater agreement in trait judgements from faces.

Authors:  Robin S S Kramer; Mila Mileva; Kay L Ritchie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Children's Facial Trustworthiness Judgments: Agreement and Relationship with Facial Attractiveness.

Authors:  Fengling Ma; Fen Xu; Xianming Luo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-12

10.  Beauty is in the belief of the beholder: cognitive influences on the neural response to facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Ravi Thiruchselvam; Jessica Harper; Abigail L Homer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.