Literature DB >> 11142866

Joint comment on "when does duration matter in judgment and decision making?" (Ariely & Loewenstein, 2000).

D Ariely1, D Kahneman, G Loewenstein.   

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that people care about the temporal relationships within a sequence of experiences. There is considerable evidence that people pay particular attention to the way experiences improve or deteriorate over time and to their maximum (peak) and final values. D. Kahneman and coauthors suggested in earlier articles that people ignore or severely underweight duration (which they referred to as duration neglect). In the preceding article, D. Ariely and G. Loewenstein (2000) challenged the generalizability of these findings and their normative implications. In the current commentary, D. Ariely, D. Kahneman, and G. Loewenstein jointly examine the issue to provide a better understanding of what they feel they have learned from this literature and to discuss the remaining open questions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11142866     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.129.4.524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  4 in total

1.  Neurobiological basis of feeling of knowing in episodic memory.

Authors:  Metehan Irak; Can Soylu; Gözem Turan; Dicle Çapan
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Beauty and the beholder: highly individual taste for abstract, but not real-world images.

Authors:  Edward A Vessel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The impact of uncertainty induced by the COVID-19 pandemic on intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Xuyao Wu; Jing Li; Ye Li
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2022-08-19

4.  Biases in preferences for sequences of outcomes in monkeys.

Authors:  Tommy C Blanchard; Lauren S Wolfe; Ivo Vlaev; Joel S Winston; Benjamin Y Hayden
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-12-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.