Literature DB >> 20461546

Induction by direct current pulse versus 50-Hz pacing on ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation.

Hoong Sern Lim1, Sharon Flannigan, Howard Marshall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) induced by different modes of induction may have different characteristics and defibrillation thresholds. This study compares the cycle lengths and defibrillation of VF induced by direct current (DC) pulses vs 50 Hz.
METHOD: We compared induction by DC pulses and 50-Hz pacing in this single-centre observational study of 259 consecutive patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators in 2007-2008. Patients with inadequate defibrillation safety margin (DSM), defined as unsuccessful defibrillation at 25 J, were identified.
RESULTS: Of the 259 patients, 132 underwent induction with DC pulses and 127 with 50-Hz pacing. DC pulses induced VF of shorter cycle lengths (207 ± 16 vs 231 ± 24 ms, p < 0.001) compared to 50-Hz pacing. There were 17 patients (6.6%) with inadequate DSM-13/132 (9.8%) with DC pulse vs 4/127 (3.1%) with 50-Hz pacing (p < 0.001). The induced VF cycle lengths were shorter in patients with inadequate DSM (186 ± 25 vs 221 ± 21 ms, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, only the induced VF cycle length (p = 0.002) was independently associated with inadequate DSM.
CONCLUSION: VF of shorter cycle lengths is independently associated with inadequate DSM. DC pulses are associated with greater proportion of patients with inadequate DSM as it induces VF of shorter cycle lengths compared to 50-Hz pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20461546     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-010-9486-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  16 in total

1.  A comparison of the output characteristics of several implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Apiradee Thammanomai; Michael O Sweeney; Solomon R Eisenberg
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Effect of amiodarone and sotalol on ventricular defibrillation threshold: the optimal pharmacological therapy in cardioverter defibrillator patients (OPTIC) trial.

Authors:  Stefan H Hohnloser; Paul Dorian; Robin Roberts; Michael Gent; Carsten W Israel; Eric Fain; Jean Champagne; Stuart J Connolly
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  A minimal model of the monophasic defibrillation pulse.

Authors:  M W Kroll
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  High defibrillation thresholds in transvenous biphasic implantable defibrillators: clinical predictors and prognostic implications.

Authors:  Himanshu H Shukla; Greg C Flaker; Vinod Jayam; David Roberts
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  DL and D sotalol decrease defibrillation energy requirements.

Authors:  M Wang; P Dorian
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  The effect of inducing ventricular fibrillation with 50-Hz pacing versus T wave stimulation on the ability to defibrillate.

Authors:  R A Malkin; E E Johnson
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Is all ventricular fibrillation the same? Influence of mode of induction on characteristics of ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  T Taneja; J Goldberger; D Johnson; A Kadish
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-12

8.  Clinical predictors of defibrillation thresholds with an active pectoral pulse generator lead system.

Authors:  Denice M Hodgson; Mary R Olsovsky; Stephen R Shorofsky; Barry Daly; Michael R Gold
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 9.  Present understanding of shock polarity for internal defibrillation: the obvious and non-obvious clinical implications.

Authors:  Mark W Kroll; Igor R Efimov; Patrick J Tchou
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Shock on T versus direct current voltage for induction of ventricular fibrillation: a randomized prospective comparison.

Authors:  Arjun D Sharma; Eric Fain; P Gearoid O'Neill; Anne Skadsen; Roger Damle; Jim Baker; Vinod Chauhan; Meir Mazuz; Terrance Ross; Ziaozheng Zhang
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.