Literature DB >> 11991364

Clinical predictors of defibrillation thresholds with an active pectoral pulse generator lead system.

Denice M Hodgson1, Mary R Olsovsky, Stephen R Shorofsky, Barry Daly, Michael R Gold.   

Abstract

Active pectoral pulse generators are used routinely for initial ICD placement because they reduce DFTs and simplify the implantation procedure. Despite the common use of these systems, little is known regarding the clinical predictors of defibrillation efficacy with active pulse generator lead configurations. Such predictors would be helpful to identify patients likely to require higher output devices or more complicated implantations. This was a prospective evaluation of DFT using a uniform testing protocol in 102 consecutive patients with an active pectoral can and dual coil transvenous lead. For each patient, the DFT was measured with a step-down protocol. In addition, 34 parameters were assessed including standard clinical echocardiographic and radiographic measures. Multivariate stepwise regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of the DFT. The mean DFT was 9.3 +/- 4.6 J and 93% (95/102) of patients had a DFT < or = 15 J. The QRS duration, interventricular septum thickness, left ventricular mass, and mass index were significant but weak (R < 0.3) univariate predictors of DFT. The left ventricular mass was the only independent predictor by multivariate analysis, but this parameter accounted for < 5% of the variability of DFT measured (adjusted R2 = 0.047, P = 0.017). The authors concluded that an acceptable DFT (< 15 J) is observed in > 90% of patients with this dual coil and active pectoral can lead system. Clinical factors are of limited use for predicting DFTs and identifying those patients who will have high thresholds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11991364     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00408.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of defibrillation safety margin in modern implantable cardioverter defibrillators after administration of amiodarone.

Authors:  Julia Köbe; Florian Reinke; Dirk G Dechering; Günter Breithardt; Lars Eckardt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Incidence of very high defibrillation thresholds (DFT) and efficacy of subcutaneous (SQ) array insertion during implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation.

Authors:  Atul Verma; Alexander J Kaplan; Bradley Sarak; Richard Oosthuizen; Marianne Beardsall; Jan Higgenbottam; Zaev Wulffhart; Yaariv Khaykin
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Induction by direct current pulse versus 50-Hz pacing on ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation.

Authors:  Hoong Sern Lim; Sharon Flannigan; Howard Marshall
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  How to Manage a High Defibrillation Threshold in ICD Patients: and Does it Really Matter?

Authors:  Maria Vittoria Matassini; Jeff S Healey
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-08

5.  Echocardiographic parameters to predict inadequate defibrillation safety margin in patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary prevention.

Authors:  Sachin Kumar Amruthlal Jain; Hamid Ghanbari; Rayan Hourani; Timothy R Larsen; Marcos Daccarett; Christian Machado
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  The relationship between defibrillation threshold and total mortality.

Authors:  Jason C Rubenstein; Michael H Kim; Fred Morady; S Adam Strickberger
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: characterization of anatomical parameters impacting substernal implantation and defibrillation efficacy.

Authors:  Levente Molnár; Ian Crozier; Haris Haqqani; David O'Donnell; Emily Kotschet; Jeffrey Alison; Amy E Thompson; Varun A Bhatia; Roland Papp; Endre Zima; Ádám Jermendy; Astrid Apor; Béla Merkely
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 5.486

8.  High defibrillation threshold: the science, signs and solutions.

Authors:  Sony Jacob; Victorio Pidlaoan; Jaspreet Singh; Aditya Bharadwaj; Mehul B Patel; Antonio Carrillo
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-01-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.