Literature DB >> 12685138

High defibrillation thresholds in transvenous biphasic implantable defibrillators: clinical predictors and prognostic implications.

Himanshu H Shukla1, Greg C Flaker, Vinod Jayam, David Roberts.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify clinical characteristics that distinguish patients with high DFTs and assess the prognostic implication. DFTs testing is a lengthy, potentially painful, and a hazardous process. Little information is available concerning the identification of patients with high DFT who undergo ICD surgery with transvenous leads and biphasic energy. This study analyzed 968 patients from two separate clinical studies who received a Medtronic cardioverter defibrillator from January 1995 through November 1999 and who had DFT testing measured by a binary search protocol. Compared to 865 patients with low defibrillation thresholds (< 18 J), the 103 patients with high thresholds (> or = 18 J) had a lower LVEF (34 +/- 16.7 vs 38.3 +/- 16.2%, P = 0.01), a worse NYHA functional class (23% Class I, 43% Class II, 29% Class III, 5% Class IV vs. 27% Class I, 55% Class II, 17% Class III, 1% Class IV, P < 0.0001), had bypass surgery less often (10.7 vs 27.5%, P < 0.0001), used amiodarone within the past 6 weeks (42.7 vs 27.2%, P = 0.002), and had a history of ventricular fibrillation more often (44.7 vs 33.1%, P = 0.02). Information concerning the number of shocks delivered was available in 345 (35%) patients; 23 were in the high DFT group and 322 were in the low DFT group. Twelve (52%) of the 23 patients in the high DFT arm received 3.6 +/- 2.7 shocks (median 2.5) and 106 (33%) of the 322 patients with low DFT received 4.9 +/- 9.5 shocks (median 2). After 6 months the mortality rate of patients with high thresholds was 11.7 vs 7.8% in patients with low thresholds (P = 0.118). Using a multivariate logistic regression model the significant predictors of death were older age, higher NYHA class, lower LVEF, amiodarone use, had a presenting arrhythmia of ventricular fibrillation and CHF but not initial high defibrillation thresholds. The study found that (1) 11% of patients have high DFTs, (2) clinical characteristics that identify high defibrillation thresholds are NYHA Class III, IV, low ejection fraction, no previous history of bypass surgery, prior amiodarone use preoperatively, and presenting with ventricular fibrillation, and (3) while high DFTs were associated with a more ill patient population, there was no difference in survival in a 6-month follow-up. Patients with a predicted low DFTs may be eligible for abbreviated ICD testing while high risk patients require formal testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12685138     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00148.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  22 in total

1.  [Is intraoperative ICD-testing still necessary?].

Authors:  C Mewis; H-R Neuberger; A Buob
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2010-06

Review 2.  New technologies of internal defibrillation.

Authors:  Derek J Dosdall; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  [Single- and dual-chamber ICDs: Are there still significant differences compared to pacemakers with regard to implantation and follow-up?].

Authors:  M Stockburger
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-12

Review 4.  The Saga of Defibrillation Testing: When Less Is More.

Authors:  Marye J Gleva; Melissa Robinson; Jeanne Poole
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Incidence and clinical predictors of low defibrillation safety margin at time of implantable defibrillator implantation.

Authors:  Zhongwei Cheng; Mintu Turakhia; Ronald Lo; Anurag Gupta; Paul C Zei; Henry H Hsia; Amin Al-Ahmad; Paul J Wang
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Incidence of very high defibrillation thresholds (DFT) and efficacy of subcutaneous (SQ) array insertion during implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation.

Authors:  Atul Verma; Alexander J Kaplan; Bradley Sarak; Richard Oosthuizen; Marianne Beardsall; Jan Higgenbottam; Zaev Wulffhart; Yaariv Khaykin
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Azygos vein lead implantation for high defibrillation thresholds in implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement.

Authors:  Naga Va Kommuri; Sri Lakshmi S Kollepara; E Saulitis; Ma Siddiqui
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-01-07

8.  How to Manage a High Defibrillation Threshold in ICD Patients: and Does it Really Matter?

Authors:  Maria Vittoria Matassini; Jeff S Healey
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-08

9.  Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy to Avoid Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks.

Authors:  Jaber Abboud; Joachim R Ehrlich
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-08

10.  Does defibrillation threshold increase as left ventricular ejection fraction decreases?

Authors:  Jesus E Val-Mejias; Ashish Oza
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-01-03       Impact factor: 5.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.