INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study aims to elucidate and expand current knowledge of the uterosacral ligament (USL) from a surgical viewpoint. METHODS: Studies were performed on 12 unembalmed cadaveric pelves and five formalin-fixed pelves. RESULTS: The USL, 12-14-cm long, can be subdivided into three sections: (1) distal (2-3 cm), intermediate (5 cm), and proximal (5-6 cm). The thick (5-20 mm) distal section, attached to cervix and upper vagina, is confluent laterally with the cardinal ligament. The proximal section is diffuse in attachment and generally thinner. The relatively unattached intermediate section is wide, and thick, well defined when placed under tension, more than 2 cm from the ureter and suitable for surgical use. The strength of the USL is perhaps derived not only from the ligament itself, but also from the addition of extraperitoneal connective tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The USL can be subdivided into three sections according to thickness and attachments with the intermediate section suitable for surgical use, particularly for vaginal vault support.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study aims to elucidate and expand current knowledge of the uterosacral ligament (USL) from a surgical viewpoint. METHODS: Studies were performed on 12 unembalmed cadaveric pelves and five formalin-fixed pelves. RESULTS: The USL, 12-14-cm long, can be subdivided into three sections: (1) distal (2-3 cm), intermediate (5 cm), and proximal (5-6 cm). The thick (5-20 mm) distal section, attached to cervix and upper vagina, is confluent laterally with the cardinal ligament. The proximal section is diffuse in attachment and generally thinner. The relatively unattached intermediate section is wide, and thick, well defined when placed under tension, more than 2 cm from the ureter and suitable for surgical use. The strength of the USL is perhaps derived not only from the ligament itself, but also from the addition of extraperitoneal connective tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The USL can be subdivided into three sections according to thickness and attachments with the intermediate section suitable for surgical use, particularly for vaginal vault support.
Authors: Emily E Cole; Patrick B Leu; Alex Gomelsky; Patricia Revelo; Heidi Shappell; Harriette M Scarpero; Roger R Dmochowski Journal: BJU Int Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Simon A Butler-Manuel; Lee D K Buttery; Julia M Polak; Roger A'Hern; Desmond P J Barton Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.060
Authors: W Andre Silva; Rachel N Pauls; Jeffrey L Segal; Christopher M Rooney; Steven D Kleeman; Mickey M Karram Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Bernard T Haylen; Christopher F Maher; Matthew D Barber; Sérgio Camargo; Vani Dandolu; Alex Digesu; Howard B Goldman; Martin Huser; Alfredo L Milani; Paul A Moran; Gabriel N Schaer; Mariëlla I J Withagen Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Bernard T Haylen; Christopher F Maher; Matthew D Barber; Sérgio Camargo; Vani Dandolu; Alex Digesu; Howard B Goldman; Martin Huser; Alfredo L Milani; Paul A Moran; Gabriel N Schaer; Mariëlla I J Withagen Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Luyun Chen; Rajeev Ramanah; Yvonne Hsu; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L Delancey Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 2.894