Literature DB >> 19159055

Bilateral extraperitoneal uterosacral vaginal vault suspension: a 2-year follow-up longitudinal case series of 123 patients.

Brigitte Fatton1, Peter L Dwyer, Chahin Achtari, P K Tan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study is to assess anatomical and functional results of the extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (USL) in women with post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty-three consecutive women were included. Concurrent procedures were anterior colporraphy with fascial repair (20%) and mesh reinforcement (49%), posterior colporraphy with fascial repair (38%) and mesh reinforcement (56%) and a sling procedure (29%). Women were assessed using Baden and Walker and pelvic organ prolapse quantification classification pre- and post-operatively.
RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients (89%) were available for follow-up. Mean follow-up was 2 years. Objective success rate regarding the vaginal cuff is 95.4%. Global anatomical success rate was 85.5%. Urinary, coital and bowel symptoms were improved following surgery. Mesh exposure rate was 19.3%, with all cases managed conservatively or with minor interventions.
CONCLUSION: Bilateral extraperitoneal USL is an effective operation to restore apical support with low morbidity, which avoids potential risks associated with opening the peritoneal cavity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19159055     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-008-0791-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  30 in total

1.  The risk of vaginal wall prolapse following sacro-spinous fixation.

Authors:  M R M Elghorori; A A Ahmed; H Al-Taher
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 2.  Surgical management of the apical vaginal defect.

Authors:  Brian J Flynn; George D Webster
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Uterosacral ligament vault suspension: five-year outcomes.

Authors:  W Andre Silva; Rachel N Pauls; Jeffrey L Segal; Christopher M Rooney; Steven D Kleeman; Mickey M Karram
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  The sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension: Critical analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  M Meschia; F Bruschi; F Amicarelli; P Pifarotti; M Marchini; P G Crosignani
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1999

5.  Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation.

Authors:  J T Benson; V Lucente; E McClellan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  Posthysterectomy vault prolapse.

Authors:  J W Barrington; G Edwards
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2000

7.  Effectiveness of the McCall culdeplasty in maintaining support after vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Joseph M Montella; Michelle Y Morrill
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-10-28

8.  Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh.

Authors:  Peter L Dwyer; Barry A O'Reilly
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Bilateral attachment of the vaginal cuff to iliococcygeus fascia: an effective method of cuff suspension.

Authors:  B L Shull; C V Capen; M W Riggs; T J Kuehl
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Low-weight polypropylene mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Reijo Hiltunen; Kari Nieminen; Teuvo Takala; Eila Heiskanen; Mauri Merikari; Kirsti Niemi; Pentti K Heinonen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  8 in total

1.  Surgical anatomy of the uterosacral ligament.

Authors:  Dzung Vu; Bernard T Haylen; Kelly Tse; Annabelle Farnsworth
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  High levator myorraphy versus uterosacral ligament suspension for vaginal vault fixation: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Franca Natale; Chiara La Penna; Anna Padoa; Massimo Agostini; Massimo Panei; Mauro Cervigni
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Modified extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension for prevention of vault prolapse after vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Manidip Pal; Soma Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: abdominal and vaginal approaches.

Authors:  Kristina Cvach; Peter Dwyer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Technique of extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension for apical suspension.

Authors:  Lin L Ow; Caroline E Walsh; Natarajan Rajamaheswari; Peter L Dwyer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Apical prolapse.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.

Authors:  Lin Li Ow; Yik N Lim; Joseph Lee; Christine Murray; Elizabeth Thomas; Alison Leitch; Anna Rosamilia; Peter L Dwyer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.894

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.