Literature DB >> 24170225

Cardinal ligament surgical anatomy: cardinal points at hysterectomy.

Andrew Samaan1, Dzung Vu, Bernard T Haylen, Kelly Tse.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The cardinal ligament (CL) still requires more precise anatomical mapping. We aim to elucidate the anatomy of the CL and the roles it plays in gynecological surgery.
METHODS: Studies employed sharp dissection of 28 formalin-fixed cadaveric hemipelves and 10 unembalmed cadaveric hemipelves.
RESULTS: The CL (total length averaging 10.0 cm) can be subdivided into three sections: a distal (cervical) section, on average 2.1 cm long, attached to the lateral aspect of the cervix (posteriorly, it was confluent with the attachment of the uterosacral [USL] ligament to form the cardinal-uterosacral confluence [CUSC]); an intermediate section, on average 3.4 cm long, running laterally (slightly posteriorly) from the cervix; a proximal (pelvic) section, relatively thick, triangular-shaped on cross-section, averaging 4.6 cm long, attached to the lateral pelvic sidewall, with its apex at the first branching of the internal iliac artery. Only the distal section is free of any significant neural or vascular component (ureter is in the intermediate section) and therefore safe for surgical use. The CUSC (first pedicle of a vaginal hysterectomy and later pedicle of an abdominal hysterectomy), if attached to the vaginal vault at hysterectomy has the potential for both lateral (CL) and supero-posterior (USL) surgical support. This pedicle would not be subsequently accessible for other surgeries.
CONCLUSIONS: Suggested cardinal points at hysterectomy are: know the CL anatomy; the distal section (as part of the CUSC) can provide vaginal vault support; the intermediate and proximal sections are surgically dangerous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24170225     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2248-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  24 in total

1.  Pelvic nerve plexus trauma at radical hysterectomy and simple hysterectomy: the nerve content of the uterine supporting ligaments.

Authors:  S A Butler-Manuel; L D Buttery; R P A'Hern; J M Polak; D P Barton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Surgical anatomy of the uterosacral ligament.

Authors:  Dzung Vu; Bernard T Haylen; Kelly Tse; Annabelle Farnsworth
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Precise anatomy of the vesico-uterine ligament for radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Shingo Fujii; Kenji Takakura; Noriomi Matsumura; Toshihiro Higuchi; Shigeo Yura; Masaki Mandai; Tsukasa Baba
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Anatomic identification and functional outcomes of the nerve sparing Okabayashi radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Shingo Fujii; Kenji Takakura; Noriomi Matsumura; Toshihiro Higuchi; Shigeo Yura; Masaki Mandai; Tsukasa Baba; Shinya Yoshioka
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  The uterosacral complex: ligament or neurovascular pathway? Anatomical and histological study of fetuses and adults.

Authors:  Rajeev Ramanah; Bernard Parratte; Francine Arbez-Gindre; Robert Maillet; Didier Riethmuller
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-07-31

6.  Cardinal and deep uterosacral ligament lines of action: MRI based 3D technique development and preliminary findings in normal women.

Authors:  Luyun Chen; Rajeev Ramanah; Yvonne Hsu; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Anatomy and histology of apical support: a literature review concerning cardinal and uterosacral ligaments.

Authors:  Rajeev Ramanah; Mitchell B Berger; Bernard M Parratte; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the risk of injury to the autonomous pelvic nerves.

Authors:  A Ercoli; V Delmas; P Gadonneix; F Fanfani; R Villet; P Paparella; S Mancuso; G Scambia
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 9.  Clinical anatomy of the pelvic floor.

Authors:  H Fritsch; A Lienemann; E Brenner; B Ludwikowski
Journal:  Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.231

Review 10.  Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy: latest developments and historical perspective.

Authors:  C P Maas; J B Trimbos; M C DeRuiter; C J H van de Velde; G G Kenter
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.312

View more
  4 in total

1.  Posterior vaginal compartment repairs: Where are the main anatomical defects?

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Sushen Naidoo; Stephen J Kerr; Chin H Yong; Warwick Birrell
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Posterior repair quantification (PR-Q) using key anatomical indicators (KAI): preliminary report.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Dianne Avery; Tin Lok Chiu; Warwick Birrell
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Architectural differences in the anterior and middle compartments of the pelvic floor of young-adult and postmenopausal females.

Authors:  Yi Wu; Noshir F Dabhoiwala; Jaco Hagoort; Li-Wen Tan; Shao-Xiang Zhang; Wouter H Lamers
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 4.  Surgical anatomy of the vaginal vault.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Dzung Vu
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.367

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.