BACKGROUND: Collection of biological material via mailed health surveys is an emerging trend. This study was conducted to assess non-response bias in a study of sexually transmitted infection utilizing self-collected, home-obtained specimens. METHODS: Data from a nationwide administrative database on health care utilization together with data from a research study were used. The research study was an outreach screening programme including home-obtained, participant-collected, mail-delivered testing for Chlamydia trachomatis. A random sample of 1690 persons aged 18-35 years from the population registry was selected. Study materials (specimen collection kit, informed consent, questionnaire) were mailed in three waves. RESULTS: The first mailing yielded a response rate of 18.5% (n = 259), the second 10.1% (n = 141) and the third 11.4% (n = 160). Women were more likely to respond than men, and responders were less likely to have had medical care in the past year and more likely to have had a prior sexually transmitted infection than non-responders. Chlamydia trachomatis infection rates tended to be higher in early responders. Late responders appeared more like non-responders in terms of demographic factors, health care utilization patterns and potential disease status. CONCLUSION: Non-response in a health survey including biological material self-collection warrants research as it may differ from non-response in general health questionnaires.
BACKGROUND: Collection of biological material via mailed health surveys is an emerging trend. This study was conducted to assess non-response bias in a study of sexually transmitted infection utilizing self-collected, home-obtained specimens. METHODS: Data from a nationwide administrative database on health care utilization together with data from a research study were used. The research study was an outreach screening programme including home-obtained, participant-collected, mail-delivered testing for Chlamydia trachomatis. A random sample of 1690 persons aged 18-35 years from the population registry was selected. Study materials (specimen collection kit, informed consent, questionnaire) were mailed in three waves. RESULTS: The first mailing yielded a response rate of 18.5% (n = 259), the second 10.1% (n = 141) and the third 11.4% (n = 160). Women were more likely to respond than men, and responders were less likely to have had medical care in the past year and more likely to have had a prior sexually transmitted infection than non-responders. Chlamydia trachomatis infection rates tended to be higher in early responders. Late responders appeared more like non-responders in terms of demographic factors, health care utilization patterns and potential disease status. CONCLUSION: Non-response in a health survey including biological material self-collection warrants research as it may differ from non-response in general health questionnaires.
Authors: Viviënne M H C J Lahaut; Harrie A M Jansen; Dike van de Mheen; Henk F L Garretsen; Jacqueline E E Verdurmen; Ad van Dijk Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.826
Authors: W L Whittington; C Kent; P Kissinger; M K Oh; J D Fortenberry; S E Hillis; B Litchfield; G A Bolan; M E St Louis; T A Farley; H H Handsfield Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Charles F Turner; Susan M Rogers; Heather G Miller; William C Miller; James N Gribble; James R Chromy; Peter A Leone; Phillip C Cooley; Thomas C Quinn; Jonathan M Zenilman Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-02-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Victor D Dinglas; Minxuan Huang; Kristin A Sepulveda; Mariela Pinedo; Ramona O Hopkins; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Dale M Needham Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Nina H Grootendorst-van Mil; Diandra C Bouter; Witte J G Hoogendijk; Stefanie F L M van Jaarsveld; Henning Tiemeier; Cornelis L Mulder; Sabine J Roza Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Leigh Ann Simmons; Jennifer E Phipps; Mackenzie Whipps; Paige Smith; Kathryn A Carbajal; Courtney Overstreet; Jennifer McLaughlin; Koen De Lombaert; Devon Noonan Journal: Digit Health Date: 2022-09-25