Literature DB >> 10632284

HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compared with cytologic screening to detect cervical cancer.

T C Wright1, L Denny, L Kuhn, A Pollack, A Lorincz.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: More than half of the women diagnosed as having cervical cancer in the United States have not been screened within the last 3 years, despite many having had contact with the health care system. In many other regions of the world, there is only limited access to cervical cancer screening.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether testing of self-collected vaginal swabs for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA can be used to screen for cervical disease in women aged 35 years and older.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study comparing Papanicolaou smears with HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal swabs.
SETTING: Outpatient clinics in a periurban settlement outside of Cape Town, South Africa, between January 1998 and April 1999. PARTICIPANTS: Screening was performed on 1415 previously unscreened black South African women aged 35 to 65 years. INTERVENTION: Women self-collected a vaginal swab for HPV testing in the clinic and were then screened using 4 different tests: Papanicolaou smear, direct visual inspection of the cervix after the application of 5% acetic acid, cervicography, and HPV DNA testing of a clinician-obtained cervical sample. Women with abnormal results on any of the screening tests were referred for colposcopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions or invasive cancer.
RESULTS: High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were identified in 47 (3.4%) of 1365 women adequately assessed, and there were 9 cases of invasive cancer. Of women with high-grade disease, 66.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.1%-77.8%) had high risk for HPV detected in self-collected vaginal samples, and 67.9% (95% CI, 53.9%-79.4%) had an abnormal Papanicolaou smear (P = .78). The false-positive rates for HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples and Papanicolaou smears were 17.1% (95% CI, 15.1%-19.3%) and 12.3% (95% CI, 10.5%-14.2%), respectively (P<.001). A high-risk type of HPV DNA was detected in 83.9% (95% CI, 71.2%-91.9%) of women with high-grade disease and 15.5% (95% CI, 13.6%-17.7%) of women with no evidence of cervical disease using a clinician-obtained cervical sample.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that HPV testing of self-collected vaginal swabs is less specific than but as sensitive as Papanicolaou smears for detecting high-grade cervical disease in women aged 35 years and older, and HPV testing offers an important new way to increase screening in settings where cytology is not readily performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10632284     DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.1.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  85 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances: Sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  R J Gilson; A Mindel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-12

2.  Self testing for human papillomaviruses.

Authors:  C S Herrington
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Assessing non-response to a mailed health survey including self-collection of biological material.

Authors:  Anneli Uusküla; Mart Kals; Louise-Anne McNutt
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  Determinants of prevalent human papillomavirus in recently formed heterosexual partnerships: a dyadic-level analysis.

Authors:  Ann N Burchell; Allita Rodrigues; Veronika Moravan; Pierre-Paul Tellier; James Hanley; François Coutlée; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 5.  Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Les Irwig; Jonathan Craig; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-06

6.  Comparative community outreach to increase cervical cancer screening in the Mississippi Delta.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Alfio Rausa; Tameka Walls; Patti E Gravitt; Edward E Partridge; Vanessa Olivo; Shelley Niwa; Kerry Grace Morrissey; Laura Tucker; Hormuzd Katki; Isabel Scarinci
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Human papillomavirus DNA detection in menstrual blood from patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and condyloma acuminatum.

Authors:  Sze Chuen Cesar Wong; Thomas Chi Chuen Au; Sammy Chung Sum Chan; Charles Ming Lok Chan; Money Yan Yee Lam; Benny Chung Ying Zee; Wei Mei Pong; Anthony Tak Cheung Chan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Human papillomavirus infection in women in Puerto Rico: agreement between physician-collected and self-collected anogenital specimens.

Authors:  Ana Patricia Ortiz; Josefina Romaguera; Cynthia M Pérez; Yomayra Otero; Marievelisse Soto-Salgado; Keimari Méndez; Yari Valle; Maria Da Costa; Erick Suarez; Joel Palefsky; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  The laboratory diagnosis of genital human papillomavirus infections.

Authors:  François Coutlée; Danielle Rouleau; Alex Ferenczy; Eduardo Franco
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.471

10.  From the NIH: proceedings of a workshop on the importance of self-obtained vaginal specimens for detection of sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Marcia M Hobbs; Barbara van der Pol; Patricia Totten; Charlotte A Gaydos; Anna Wald; Terri Warren; Rachel L Winer; Robert L Cook; Carolyn D Deal; M Elizabeth Rogers; Julius Schachter; King K Holmes; David H Martin
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.