Literature DB >> 28142030

Rationale, design, and profile of the Three-Prefecture Cohort in Japan: A 15-year follow-up.

Junya Sado1, Tetsuhisa Kitamura1, Yuri Kitamura2, Ling Zha1, Rong Liu1, Tomotaka Sobue1, Yoshikazu Nishino3, Hideo Tanaka4, Tomio Nakayama5, Ichiro Tsuji6, Hidemi Ito4, Takaichiro Suzuki5, Kota Katanoda7, Suketami Tominaga4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We reutilized the existing Three-Prefecture Cohort to evaluate the relationship between lifestyle factors and the incidence or mortality from non-communicable diseases.
METHODS: This study was a prospective population-based observation conducted from the 1980s to 2000 in three prefectures (Miyagi, Aichi, and Osaka) in Japan. The study subjects were residents aged ≥40 years who received a questionnaire. The follow-up period was 15 years from the baseline survey in each study area. A self-administered questionnaire, which included items on participants' demographic factors and lifestyle characteristics, was administered. Vital status and date of death were collected from residence certificates by the local government, and cause of death was identified using vital statistics. Cancer incidence and the date of diagnosis were collected from local cancer registry data.
RESULTS: A total of 46,421 men and 54,189 women were eligible for our analysis. The person-years of follow-up for cancer incidence were 464,664 and 567,271 for men and women, respectively, and those for death were 527,940 and 648,601 for men and women, respectively. There were 8479 cancer incidences (5106 men and 3373 women) and 20,240 total deaths (11,156 men and 9084 women). The stomach was the most common cancer incidence site for both men (25.6%) and women (18.6%). The leading cause of death was cancer among men (35.0%) and cardiovascular disease among women (41.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: The Three-Prefecture Cohort Study enabled us to reveal the association of multiphasic lifestyle factors with cancer incidence and mortality. The study will also allow us to conduct a pooled analysis in combination with other large-scale cohorts.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Cohort; Incidence; Mortality; The Three-Prefecture Cohort

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28142030      PMCID: PMC5376309          DOI: 10.1016/j.je.2016.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0917-5040            Impact factor:   3.211


Introduction

A cohort study is one of the ways to evaluate the relationship between lifestyle factors and the incidence or mortality from non-communicable diseases. Although huge amounts of money and long-term observation are needed to conduct a cohort study, such a design could minimize selection bias and maximized external validity. Large-scale prospective cohorts focused on healthy populations (e.g., the Japan Collaborative Cohort [JACC] Study or the Japan Public Health-Based Prospective Cohort [JPHC] Study) have been conducted since 1980s in Japan. There have also been large cohort studies worldwide, such as the National Institutes of Health–American Association of Retired Persons Diet and Health Study in the United States, the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition in Europe, and the Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort Study in Korea. Indeed, many findings have been obtained from these studies. The Three-Prefecture Cohort Study was a prospective population-based observational study launched in 1983, which targeted approximately 100,000 inhabitants in Miyagi Prefecture, Aichi Prefecture, and Osaka Prefecture in Japan and conducted a questionnaire survey to reveal the association of multiphasic lifestyle factors with cancer incidence or mortality. Here, we briefly described the study concept and the cohort population's profile.

Materials and methods

Study design and settings

This cohort, which has been under prospective observation since 1983, was studied to assess the long-term effects of air pollution on mortality from lung cancer and respiratory diseases.6, 7 The study areas were chosen because they contained a national air monitoring station and had well-managed cancer surveillance systems in 1983, including eight selected urban/rural areas in Miyagi Prefecture (Sendai City and Wakuya/Tajiri Town), Aichi Prefecture (Nagoya City and Inuyama City), and Osaka Prefecture (Osaka City and Nose/Kanan/Kumatori Town). Since the 1970s, there has been a network of ambient air monitoring stations in Japan operated by the Ministry of Environment (formerly the National Environment Agency) and local governments. In this study, we defined rural areas as cities/towns with general air pollution monitoring stations (control area) and urban areas as cities/towns with automobile exhaust gas measurement stations (pollution area). Self-administered questionnaires in sealed envelopes were distributed by hand to targeted individuals in cooperation with the municipal government in each area and were collected after a set period of time. The study committee, consisting of health center directors, local officials, and residents' association representatives, was established to protect personal information of the participants and ensure the accuracy of the study. In this study, we merged individuals' data with their cancer incidence information based on personal name, gender, and date of birth. The proportion of death certificate only (DCO) deaths in each area was 9.1%–17.8% in Miyagi Prefecture, 28.1%–32.6% in Aichi Prefecture, and 20.7%–23.4% in Osaka Prefecture. The study subjects were residents aged ≥40 years who received a questionnaire, and they were enrolled between 1983 and 1985. The investigation was begun in Osaka Prefecture in 1983, in Miyagi Prefecture in 1984, and in Aichi Prefecture in 1985. The number of questionnaire responders was 17,195/17,805 (96.6%) in Sendai City, 14,574/14,926 (97.6%) in Wakuya/Tajiri Town, 21,535/23,331 (92.3%) in Nagoya City, 12,003/12,815 (93.7%) in Inuyama City, 20,665/27,051 (76.4%) in Osaka City, and 18565/21,101 (88.0%) in Nose/Kanan/Kumatori Town (Table 1). Of 104,537 responders, a total of 100,629 were included as subjects, after excluding those who answered a questionnaire in duplicate or did not provide their name/gender/date of birth because investigators could not follow up the outcome data in the Three-Prefecture Cohort study.
Table 1

Participants of the Three-Prefecture Cohort study.

Miyagi Prefecture
Aichi Prefecture
Osaka Prefecture
Total
Sendai-City (6 areas in Aoba and Miyagino wards)Wakuya/Tajiri-Towns (Entire towns)Nagoya-City (5 areas in Chigusa ward)Inuyama-City (2 areas in the city)Osaka-City (Higashinari ward)Nose/Kanan/Kumatori-Town (Entire towns)
All residents aged ≥40 years old25,23715,89124,48912,85439,30721,230139,008
Delivered questionnaires17,80514,92623,33112,81527,05121,101117,029
Responded questionnaires17,19514,57421,53512,00320,66518,565104,537
Response rate (%)a(68.1)(91.7)(87.9)(93.4)(52.6)(87.4)(75.2)
Response rate (%)b(96.6)(97.6)(92.3)(93.7)(76.4)(88.0)(89.3)

Denominator was subjects who were all residents aged ≥40 years old.

Denominator was subjects who were delivered the self-administrated questionnaire.

Questionnaire

Baseline questionnaire items included the following: area of residence, gender, height, weight, health condition at that time, past medical history, type of insurance, health check-up/cancer screening history, frequency of food intake, smoking, alcohol drinking status, parent's medical history, smoking status of cohabitants, house environment, occupation (such as the longest period of employment), and reproductive history (only for women). Medical history included: past history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, stroke, and emphysema; and stomach cancer screening by x-ray examination, blood pressure measurement, and uterus cancer screening (only for women). Food intake frequency of items, such as rice, bread, meat, fish, eggs, milk, green/yellow vegetables, non-green/yellow vegetables, fruit, miso soup, and pickled vegetables, as well as drinking beverages, such as green tea, black tea, and coffee, was assessed categorically.

Follow-up

The follow-up period was defined as 15 years from the baseline survey in each study area, except for cancer incidence data in Miyagi Prefecture, for which follow-up was 9 years. The cohorts were followed from 1984 to 1999 in Miyagi Prefecture, from 1985 to 2000 in Aichi Prefecture, and from 1983 to 2000 in Osaka Prefecture. Vital status, date of death, and date of move-out from the study area were confirmed by the local government using residence certificates. Cause of death was identified using death certificate. Cancer incidence and the date of diagnosis were collected from local cancer registry data.

Statistical analysis

The definition of disease was determined based on the International Classification of Diseases 9th version (ICD-9) for data collected from 1983 to 1994 and or the 10th version (ICD-10) for data collected from 1995 to 2000 in this study. We counted the number of incident cancers and deaths of all cancer and cancer of individual sites, and also the number of deaths according to cause of death. When mortality rates were calculated, person-years of follow-up for mortality were counted from the date of the baseline survey to the date of death, date of move-out from the study area, or the end of 15-year follow-up (whichever occurred first). For cancer incidence rates, date of diagnosis of first primary cancer was added to the above list. In addition, standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) of all-cause and all cancer were calculated using age-adjusted mortality/incidence rate, which was calculated using 5-year age-specific rates in each year according to the cancer registry and vital statistics in Japan.11, 12 Statistical analyses were implemented using STATA version 13 MP (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA).

Ethics

The study was approved by the institutional review board of the National Cancer Center and the Ethics Committee of Osaka University School of Medicine. We received permission from the municipal governments to survey residents. The response to the questionnaire by participant was considered consent to participate in the survey. Tohoku University, Aichi Cancer Center, and Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases were primarily responsible for analyzing information on baseline surveys, linking with cancer incidence and cause of death data, and altering the data set to unlinkable anonymized data. Although the National Cancer Center had originally managed the integrated datasets, Osaka University manages them at present. In the Three-Prefecture Cohort study, researchers only analyzed unlinkable anonymous data.

Results

Of 100,629 participants aged 40–99 years old at baseline, 19 (0.02%) were excluded because their responses preceded the date of beginning of follow-up, which was unified in each area after various dates of individual response to the questionnaire. As a result, 46,421 men and 54,189 women were eligible for this study. Details of the distribution of cohort participants at baseline by sex, age, and region are noted in Table 2. The person-years of follow-up for cancer incidence were 464,664 and 567,271 for men and women, respectively, and the person-years for death were 527,940 and 648,601 for men and women, respectively.
Table 2

Distribution of cohort participants at baseline by gender, age, and region.

Age at baseline, years
Total%
40–4445–4950–5455–5960–6465–6970–7475–7980–84≥85
Men
 Japan census population 1985 (x1,000)449440533898339123491771148699754624723,232
 %19.317.416.814.610.17.66.44.32.41.1100.0
 Three-prefecture cohort participants8082773577956804501840673410215397338446,421
 %17.416.716.814.710.88.87.34.62.10.8100.0
 Miyagi Prefecture (urban)113711611194105785976558637118972739115.9
 Miyagi Prefecture (rural)90310201213108278460749033311653660114.2
 Aichi Prefecture (urban)184118211760135810358186754422207410,04421.6
 Aichi Prefecture (rural)109598996382356147637725010949569212.3
 Osaka Prefecture (urban)99011611265118392776471844019367770816.6
 Osaka Prefecture (rural)211615831400130185263756431714669898519.4
Women
 Japan census population 1985 (x1,000)4554414039713574301123942046143890652526,559
 %17.115.615.013.511.39.07.75.43.42.0100.0
 Three-prefecture cohort participants85228522833778146604519642612722147174054,189
 %15.715.715.414.412.29.67.95.02.71.4100.0
 Miyagi Prefecture (urban)13181447150813791234937740453257110938317.3
 Miyagi Prefecture (rural)9381161135412681009758717391220154797014.7
 Aichi Prefecture (urban)19111944178516211361102084357826414111,46821.2
 Aichi Prefecture (rural)1071105089786971163845934617194630611.6
 Osaka Prefecture (urban)126413801404137712461031820501291125943917.4
 Osaka Prefecture (rural)20201540138913001043812682453268116962317.8
Table 3 shows selected baseline characteristics of participants by sex. Mean age among men and women was 56.1 and 57.1 years, respectively, and the proportion of participants with a body mass index of 22.0–24.9 kg/m2 was 37.0% among men and 31.9% among women. The proportion of current drinkers of alcoholic beverages was 46.9% for men and 5.4% for women, and the proportion of current smokers was 51.6% for men and 9.6% for women. Regarding the longest period occupational classification, the proportion of participants engaged in clerical work was 11.7% among men and 9.6% among women, and the proportion of those unemployed was 2.8% among men and 19.7% among women.
Table 3

Selected baseline demographic and lifestyle characteristics of participants by gender.

Men
Women
(n = 46,421)(n = 54,189)
Mean age, years (standard deviation)56.1 (11.2)57.1 (11.6)
Regions, n (%)
 Miyagi, urban7391 (15.9)9383 (17.3)
 Miyagi, rural6601 (14.2)7970 (14.7)
 Aichi, urban10,044 (21.6)11,468 (21.2)
 Aichi, rural5692 (12.3)6306 (11.6)
 Osaka, urban7708 (16.6)9439 (17.4)
 Osaka, rural8985 (19.4)9623 (17.8)
Health insurance type, n (%)
 National health insurance20,877 (45.0)25,263 (46.6)
 Government/union-managed health insurance19,267 (41.5)20,864 (38.5)
 Mutual aid associations health insurance3897 (8.4)4250 (7.8)
 Others577 (1.2)891 (1.6)
 Missing1803 (3.9)2921 (5.4)
History of hypertension, n (%)
 Current8289 (17.9)10,138 (18.7)
 Past1709 (3.7)2189 (4.0)
 Never19,820 (42.7)23,811 (43.9)
 Missing16,603 (35.8)18,051 (33.3)
History of diabetes, n (%)
 Current2725 (5.9)1803 (3.3)
 Past738 (1.6)275 (0.5)
 Never20,895 (45.0)25,586 (47.2)
 Missing22,063 (47.5)26,525 (48.9)
Body mass index, n (%)
 ≤19.0 kg/m24310 (9.3)6255 (11.5)
 19.0–21.9 kg/m214,995 (32.3)17,153 (31.7)
 22.0–24.9 kg/m217,155 (37.0)17,294 (31.9)
 25.0–29.9 kg/m27528 (16.2)9378 (17.3)
 ≥30.0 kg/m2515 (1.1)1130 (2.1)
 Missing1918 (4.1)2979 (5.5)
Alcohol drinking, n (%)
 Never7122 (15.3)26,119 (48.2)
 Former2787 (6.0)1094 (2.0)
 Current occasional11,884 (25.6)13,497 (24.9)
 Current almost daily21,776 (46.9)2942 (5.4)
 Missing2852 (6.1)10,537 (19.4)
Smoking status, n (%)
 Never7411 (16.0)37,281 (68.8)
 Former10,805 (23.3)1746 (3.2)
 Current23,969 (51.6)5199 (9.6)
 Missing4236 (9.1)9963 (18.4)
Green and yellow vegetable consumption, n (%)
 ≤1–2 times/month3311 (7.1)2183 (4.0)
 1–2 times/week10,320 (22.2)8563 (15.8)
 3–4 times/week12,623 (27.2)14,918 (27.5)
 Almost daily17,509 (37.7)24,445 (45.1)
 Missing2658 (5.7)4080 (7.5)
Non-green and non-yellow vegetable consumption, n (%)
 ≤1–2 times/month1491 (3.2)1111 (2.1)
 1–2 times/week6634 (14.3)5229 (9.6)
 3–4 times/week12,267 (26.4)12,816 (23.7)
 Almost daily23,782 (51.2)31,276 (57.7)
 Missing2247 (4.8)3757 (6.9)
Fruit consumption, n (%)
 ≤1–2 times/month5040 (10.9)2452 (4.5)
 1–2 times/week9631 (20.7)6291 (11.6)
 3–4 times/week10,303 (22.2)10,649 (19.7)
 Almost daily18,308 (39.4)30,535 (56.3)
 Missing3139 (6.8)4262 (7.9)
Miso soup consumption, n (%)
 ≤1–2 times/month3141 (6.8)3823 (7.1)
 1–2 times/week7127 (15.4)8473 (15.6)
 3–4 times/week8035 (17.3)9746 (18.0)
 Almost daily25,913 (55.8)28,213 (52.1)
 Missing2205 (4.8)3934 (7.3)
Pickled vegetable consumption, n (%)
 Scarcely any2296 (4.9)2095 (3.9)
 1–2 times/month2311 (5.0)2380 (4.4)
 1–2 times/week5114 (11.0)5340 (9.9)
 3–4 times/week6508 (14.0)6753 (12.5)
 Almost daily27,016 (58.2)32,802 (60.5)
 Missing3176 (6.8)4819 (8.9)
Type of job, n (%)
 Professional technical and civil workers3835 (8.3)2805 (5.2)
 Managerial workers959 (2.1)98 (0.2)
 Clerical workers5415 (11.7)5197 (9.6)
 Sales workers5495 (11.8)3663 (6.8)
 Agricultural, forestry and fisheries workers2844 (6.1)3127 (5.8)
 Construction workers92 (0.2)9 (0.0)
 Workers in transport and communications1814 (3.9)309 (0.6)
 Craftsman, production process worker, and laborers9537 (20.5)4740 (8.7)
 Workers in security567 (1.2)18 (0.0)
 Service workers1069 (2.3)2750 (5.1)
 Unemployed1284 (2.8)10,666 (19.7)
 Missing13,510 (29.1)20,807 (38.4)
Table 4 shows the follow-up results, Table 5 lists major types of incident cancers, and Table 6 lists major causes of death by gender. There were 20,240 total deaths (20.1%; 11,156 men and 9084 women), and 20,281 move-outs (20.2%; 9145 men and 11,136 women) (Table 4). The SIR of all cancers was 0.96 among men and 1.22 among women. The SMR of all causes was 0.91 among men and women, and the SMR of all cancers was 1.02 among men and 0.97 among women. Stomach cancer was the most frequent cancer among men (25.5%) and women (18.7%), followed by lung cancer among men (17.1%) and breast cancer among women (13.0%) (Table 5). The leading cause of death was cancer among men (35.0%) and cardiovascular disease among women (41.0%), and the second-leading cause of death was cardiovascular disease among men (33.0%) and cancer among women (25.7%) (Table 6). Among those who died of cancer, the first-, second-, and third-leading causes of death were cancer of the lung (21.9%), stomach (21.2%), and liver (14.4%) among men, and cancer of the stomach (18.7%), colon/rectum (13.2%), and lung (11.8%) among women.
Table 4

15-year follow-up status until 2000 by gender and age.

Age at baseline, years
Total
40–4445–4950–5455–5960–6465–6970–7475–7980–84≥85
Men
 Number at baseline8082773577956804501840673410215397338446,421
 Number of all cancer incidences215371665891841802712414159365106
 % (Number of all cancer incidences/Number at baseline)2.74.88.513.116.819.720.919.216.39.411.0
 Number of deaths3205069601268140717902054164285035911,156
 % (Number of all cause deaths/Number at baseline)4.06.512.318.628.044.060.276.387.493.524.0
 Number of all cancer deaths135230463642615641626375140353902
 % (Number of all cancer deaths/Number at baseline)1.73.05.99.412.315.818.417.414.49.18.4
 Number who left study area235919911608115173555842122680169145
 % (Number who left study area/Number at baseline)29.225.720.616.914.613.712.310.58.24.219.7
 Person-years (incidence)87,75883,56083,34571,78350,83137,77328,22314,55051751666464,664
 Incidence rate (all cancer per 1000 person-years)2.44.48.012.416.521.225.228.530.721.611.0
 Person-years (mortality)96,38993,64995,42883,10259,57944,10732,19316,27855001714527,940
 Mortality rate (all cause per 1000 person-years)3.35.410.115.323.640.663.8100.9154.5209.421.1
 Mortality rate (all cancer per 1000 person-years)1.42.54.97.710.314.519.423.025.520.47.4
Women
 Number at baseline85228522833778146604519642612722147174054,189
 Number of cancer incidences229291386483513539478296121373373
 % (Number of all cancer incidences/Number at baseline)2.73.44.66.27.810.411.210.98.25.06.2
 Number of deaths18130144666294613651712164811576669084
 % (Number of all cause deaths/Number at baseline)2.13.55.38.514.326.340.260.578.790.016.8
 Number of all cancer deaths98170211286325410404278115342331
 % (Number of all cancer deaths/Number at baseline)1.12.02.53.74.97.99.510.27.84.64.3
 Number who left study area2242205116931483123310127584401665811,136
 % (Number who left study area/Number at baseline)26.324.120.319.018.719.517.816.211.37.820.6
 Person-years (incidence)94,98494,63692,19085,76371,42753,08440,22422,46893223172567,271
 Incidence rate (all cancer per 1000 person-years)2.43.14.25.67.210.211.913.213.011.75.9
 Person-years (mortality)105,776107,461107,287100,09683,05260,98246,00824,74099273272648,601
 Mortality rate (all cause per 1000 person-years)1.72.84.26.611.422.437.266.6116.6203.514.0
 Mortality rate (all cancer per 1000 person-years)0.91.62.02.93.96.78.811.211.610.43.6
Table 5

Distribution of number of cancer incidence by site, gender, and age at baseline during 15-year follow-up.

ICD10ICD9Age at baseline, years
Total%
40–4445–4950–5455–5960–6465–6970–7475–7980–84≥85
Men
 C00-C97140–208.9all cancer215371665891841802712414159365106100.0
 C15150–150.9Esophagus142025433529298402074.1
 C16151–151.9Stomach5294180235224191187953410130225.5
 C18153–153.9Colon26407874757552371914779.3
 C19-20154–154.9Rectum1828294446332321312464.8
 C22155–155.9Liver and intrahepatic bile ducts24581171378283573315260811.9
 C23156Gall bladder0233234200190.4
 C24156.1–156.9Other and unspecified parts of biliary tract44119112015842881.7
 C25157–157.9Pancreas1010193437332921822034.0
 C33-34162–162.9Lung2438791201601741608525887317.1
 C61185–185.9Prostate171039314135251522064.0
 C64189–189.1Kidney31082114118700821.6
 C65-67189.2–189.4Urothelial tract2941191311320641.3
 C82-85202–202.9Non-Hodgkin's3510101278523651.3
200–200.9
 C90203–203.8Multiple myeloma1053830310240.5
 C92205–205.9Myeloid leukemia4376573312410.8
Women
 C00-C97140–208.9all cancer229291386483513539478296121373373100.0
 C15150–150.9Esophagus0114455500250.7
 C16151–151.9Stomach32495983104103966335663018.7
 C18153–153.9Colon103544545367594112638111.3
 C19-20154–154.9Rectum15152425292827111021865.5
 C22155–155.9Liver and intrahepatic bile ducts514223138432911822036.0
 C23156Gall bladder0333554600290.9
 C24156.1–156.9Other and unspecified parts of biliary tract23581221161352872.6
 C25157–157.9Pancreas3692625352819511574.7
 C33-34162–162.9Lung1682642525660341053099.2
 C50174–175.9Breast72747173584230136043913.0
 C53180–180.9Cervi uteri16178221514178101183.5
 C54182–182.9Corpus uteri9132215784000782.3
 C55184–184.9Uterus, part unspecified0011231120110.3
 C56183–183.9Ovary1513181281012740992.9
 C64189–189.1Kidney2143225130230.7
 C65-67189.2–189.4Urothelial tract0043573301260.8
 C82-85200–200.9Non-Hodgkin's23410766541481.4
202–202.9
 C90203–203.8Multiple myeloma0034446311260.8
 C92205–205.9Myeloid leukemia4534361200280.8
Table 6

Distribution of number of deaths by cause, gender, and age at baseline during 15-year follow-up.

ICD10ICD9Age at baseline, years
Total%%
40–4445–4950–5455–5960–6465–6970–7475–7980–84≥85
Men
 All causes3205069601268140717902054164285035911,156100.0
 A00-B991–139.8Certain infectious and parasitic diseases22113840314635281062672.4
 C00-C97140–208.9all cancer13523046364261564162637514035390235.0100.0
 C15150–150.9Esophagus151322413227269701924.9
 C16151–151.9Stomach283910412612013715184291182921.2
 C18153–153.9Colon10173840414733301312706.9
 C19-20154–154.9Rectum1010202527191919411543.9
 C22155–155.9Liver and intrahepatic bile ducts16521071278076602914256314.4
 C23156Gall bladder04441096401421.1
 C24156.1–156.9Other and unspecified parts of biliary tract361181321141252952.4
 C25157–157.9Pancreas914213941363323622245.7
 C33-34162–162.9Lung2236661231521651718924885621.9
 C61185–185.9Prostate04711202724161311233.2
 C64189–189.1Kidney0336886300370.9
 C65-67189.2–189.4Urothelial tract0014233100140.4
 C82-85200–200.9Non-Hodgkin's32912111013822721.8
202–202.9
 C90203–203.8Multiple myeloma1132532300210.5
 C92205–205.9Myeloid leukemia3365864212401.0
 E00-E89240–279.9Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases06914202919261731431.3
 G00-G99330–359.9Diseases of the nervous system1569121810830720.6
 I00-I99390–459.9Diseases of the circulatory system76121242304407578772644364173368133.0
 I20-I25410–414.9Ischemic heart disease163362741161421761156016810
 I48427.3Atrial fibrillation and flutter003216764231
 I50428–428.9Heart failure23324853741071821819450844
 I60-69430–438.9Cerebrovascular disease264287130143216308270166881476
 I71441–441.9Aortic aneurysm and dissection225815211385281
 J00-J99460–519.9Diseases of the respiratory system414417613425535129916159139412.5
 J10-J18480–487.9Influenza1815466813922819811340856
 J43492Emphysema005552219144579
 K00-K93520–579.9Diseases of the digestive system21396361596962592764664.2
 K74571.5–571.6Fibrosis and cirrhosis of liver71438262217121060152
 N00-N99580–629.9Diseases of the genitourinary system471229363757532582682.4
 N17-N19584–586Acute kidney failure and chronic kidney disease37112132284843172212
 R00-R99780–799.9Symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified735151733518067563343.0
 R54797Age-related physical debility100111115575255193
 S00-T88800–999.9External causes42566057534341352154133.7
Others8142121234130351582161.9
Women
 All causes18130144666294613651712164811576669084100.0
 A00-B991–139.8Certain infectious and parasitic diseases672124363138332142212.4
 C00-C97140–208.9all cancer9817021128632541040427811534233125.7100.0
 C15150–150.9Esophagus0026248530301.3
 C16151–151.9Stomach152935495174806531743618.7
 C18153–153.9Colon5162227253046331052199.4
 C19-20154–154.9Rectum310131613191610921114.8
 C22155–155.9Liver and intrahepatic bile ducts414142640383011821878.0
 C23156Gall bladder127981915910713.0
 C24156.1–156.9Other and unspecified parts of biliary tract36871321141672974.2
 C25157–157.9Pancreas56123225403018621767.6
 C33-34162–162.9Lung111217363855573311527511.8
 C50174–175.9Breast232922162216118301506.4
 C53180–180.9Cervi uteri5414785400381.6
 C54182–182.9Corpus uteri1443037000220.9
 C55184–184.9Uterus, part unspecified000121102070.3
 C56183–183.9Ovary8915108911640803.4
 C64189–189.1Kidney1003017130160.7
 C65-67189.2–189.4Urothelial tract0021412000100.4
 C82-85200–200.9Non-Hodgkin's1248993641472.0
202–202.9
 C90203–203.8Multiple myeloma0134458410301.3
 C92205–205.9Myeloid leukemia2534461200271.2
 E00-E89240–279.9Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases24512182037291531451.6
 G00-G99330–359.9Diseases of the nervous system3284111391240660.7
 I00-I99390–459.9Diseases of the circulatory system3365112171322543753780600343372241.0
 I20-I25410–414.9Ischemic heart disease492439731271341238932654
 I48427.3Atrial fibrillation and flutter000203782123
 I50428–428.9Heart failure98202871124164218173118933
 I60-69430–438.9Cerebrovascular disease123350811302183353372511501597
 I71441–441.9Aortic aneurysm and dissection1101581282038
 J00-J99460–519.9Diseases of the respiratory system7122047811111972211387590910.0
 J10-J18480–487.9Influenza1482544721331499867601
 J43492Emphysema000121143214
 K00-K93520–579.9Diseases of the digestive system9924393862686854263974.4
 K74571.5–571.6Fibrosis and cirrhosis of liver5510181722221020111
 N00-N99580–629.9Diseases of the genitourinary system339192345655243172793.1
 N17-N19584–586Acute kidney failure and chronic kidney disease33817183350382916215
 R00-R99780–799.9Symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified232111133511091191414825.3
 R54797Age-related physical debility00002162887112130375
 S00-T88800–999.9External causes111815315052462621112813.1
Others7819183145444027122512.8

Discussion

The Three-Prefecture Cohort Study, which had approximately 100,000 participants with consecutive follow-up for up to 15 years and a 90% response rate to the baseline questionnaire survey regarding participants' lifestyles, was one of the largest representative prospective, population-based cohort studies in Japan. The study areas were selected because they contained national air monitoring stations and the community-based cancer registry was conducted actively; this large-scale observation enabled us to determine not only all-cause mortality but also cancer incidence among community residents. The association of air pollution and lung cancer mortality was reported previously. This report briefly describes the characteristics (e.g., smoking status, alcohol drinking status, and type of occupation) and endpoints among study participants by gender. This study had several strengths. First, more than 100,000 participants answered a baseline questionnaire survey, and the response rate was approximately 90%. This response rate was similar to those of the JACC Study, which was launched in the mid-1980s, and the JPHC Study, which was launched in the 1990s. Many cohort studies in Japan have focused on residents in rural areas in order to conduct long-term follow-up.1, 2 However, since this study included both urban and rural areas, findings from this cohort may help to evaluate the relationship between lifestyles and various diseases, irrespective of area. This study population was similar to the general population in cancer and mortality risks, with SIR and SMR close to 1.0.11, 12 Considering the large sample size, the high questionnaire response rate, and adequate regional balance, we consider that the association between participants' lifestyles and endpoints measured in this study is generalizable to the whole population of Japan. Second, in contrast to other large-scale cohorts in Japan, the collection of detailed information on participants' occupation, such as the longest period of employment, is another strength of this study, and we will address the association between occupation and incidence and mortality of non-communicable diseases in the future using this cohort data. Third, the use of community-based cancer incidence data from a cohort of 100,000 participants was also a strength of this study, because there are few available analyses of cancer incidence data from large-scale cohort studies in Japan. Fourth, this cohort can be pooled with other large-scale cohorts in Japan (e.g., the JACC Study, the JPHC Study, or the Ohsaki Cohort) and serve to provide new findings from Japan. This study has several limitations. First, this registry was launched in the 1980s and its follow-up of participants was completed in 2000. The associations between participants' lifestyles and endpoints might differ from those since 2000, because lifestyles diversify with the times. Second, in cohort studies, non-questionnaire responders had more unfavorable lifestyles than responders2, 14, 15, 16 and were less likely to join the health check-ups. However, the overall response rate in this cohort was almost 90%, and we consider that the impact of differences between responders in cities and those in towns would be small. Furthermore, the numbers of delivered questionnaires in Sendai City and Osaka City were fewer than those in other cities/towns, because residents' local organizations did not cover the entire community and could not deliver questionnaires in the whole region. Therefore, the representativeness would be weaker in these areas than in other areas. Third, we could not evaluate the energy intake or nutrient consumption of participants because the Three-Prefecture Cohort Study used a food frequency questionnaire with a small number of items.

Conclusions

The Three-Prefecture Cohort Study was conducted from the 1980s to 2000 and is one of the largest representative prospective population-based cohort studies in Japan. This study enabled us to reveal the association of multiphasic lifestyle factors with cancer incidence and mortality in a single cohort. It will also allow us to conduct a pooled analysis in combination with other large-scale cohorts, which will be of considerable help in gaining insights into the epidemiology of non-communicable diseases in Japan.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.
  12 in total

1.  Patterns of non-response to a mail survey.

Authors:  C A Macera; K L Jackson; D R Davis; J J Kronenfeld; S N Blair
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Non-response bias in a lifestyle survey.

Authors:  A Hill; J Roberts; P Ewings; D Gunnell
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1997-06

3.  Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2008: a study of 25 population-based cancer registries for the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project.

Authors:  Ayako Matsuda; Tomohiro Matsuda; Akiko Shibata; Kota Katanoda; Tomotaka Sobue; Hiroshi Nishimoto
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Design and serendipity in establishing a large cohort with wide dietary intake distributions : the National Institutes of Health-American Association of Retired Persons Diet and Health Study.

Authors:  A Schatzkin; A F Subar; F E Thompson; L C Harlan; J Tangrea; A R Hollenbeck; P E Hurwitz; L Coyle; N Schussler; D S Michaud; L S Freedman; C C Brown; D Midthune; V Kipnis
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort Study including a Biological Materials Bank (KMCC-I).

Authors:  Keun Young Yoo; Hai Rim Shin; Soung Hoon Chang; Kun Sei Lee; Sue Kyung Park; Daehee Kang; Duck Hee Lee
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2002

6.  Background characteristics of basic health examination participants: the JPHC Study Baseline Survey.

Authors:  Motoki Iwasaki; Tetsuya Otani; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Manami Inoue; Tomoyuki Hanaoka; Tomotaka Sobue; Shoichiro Tsugane
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.211

7.  European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): study populations and data collection.

Authors:  E Riboli; K J Hunt; N Slimani; P Ferrari; T Norat; M Fahey; U R Charrondière; B Hémon; C Casagrande; J Vignat; K Overvad; A Tjønneland; F Clavel-Chapelon; A Thiébaut; J Wahrendorf; H Boeing; D Trichopoulos; A Trichopoulou; P Vineis; D Palli; H B Bueno-De-Mesquita; P H M Peeters; E Lund; D Engeset; C A González; A Barricarte; G Berglund; G Hallmans; N E Day; T J Key; R Kaaks; R Saracci
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.022

8.  The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study: design of study and profile of participants at baseline.

Authors:  Shinichi Kuriyama; Naoki Nakaya; Kaori Ohmori-Matsuda; Taichi Shimazu; Nobutaka Kikuchi; Masako Kakizaki; Toshimasa Sone; Fumi Sato; Masato Nagai; Yumi Sugawara; Yasutake Tomata; Munira Akhter; Mizuka Higashiguchi; Naru Fukuchi; Hideko Takahashi; Atsushi Hozawa; Ichiro Tsuji
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 3.211

9.  An association between long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and mortality from lung cancer and respiratory diseases in Japan.

Authors:  Kota Katanoda; Tomotaka Sobue; Hiroshi Satoh; Kazuo Tajima; Takaichiro Suzuki; Haruo Nakatsuka; Toshiro Takezaki; Tomio Nakayama; Hiroshi Nitta; Kiyoshi Tanabe; Suketami Tominaga
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.211

10.  Cohort profile of the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study at final follow-up.

Authors:  Akiko Tamakoshi; Kotaro Ozasa; Yoshihisa Fujino; Koji Suzuki; Kiyomi Sakata; Mitsuru Mori; Shogo Kikuchi; Hiroyasu Iso; Fumio Sakauchi; Yutaka Motohashi; Ichiro Tsuji; Yosikazu Nakamura; Haruo Mikami; Michiko Kurosawa; Yoshiharu Hoshiyama; Naohito Tanabe; Koji Tamakoshi; Kenji Wakai; Shinkan Tokudome; Shuji Hashimoto; Yasuhiko Wada; Takashi Kawamura; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Tsuneharu Miki; Chigusa Date; Yoichi Kurozawa; Takesumi Yoshimura; Akira Shibata; Naoyuki Okamoto; Hideo Shio
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 3.211

View more
  9 in total

1.  Green tea consumption and mortality in Japanese men and women: a pooled analysis of eight population-based cohort studies in Japan.

Authors:  Sarah Krull Abe; Eiko Saito; Norie Sawada; Shoichiro Tsugane; Hidemi Ito; Yingsong Lin; Akiko Tamakoshi; Junya Sado; Yuri Kitamura; Yumi Sugawara; Ichiro Tsuji; Chisato Nagata; Atsuko Sadakane; Taichi Shimazu; Tetsuya Mizoue; Keitaro Matsuo; Mariko Naito; Keitaro Tanaka; Manami Inoue
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 2.  Contributions of the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) in Improving the Quality of Life in Women With Gynecological Malignancies.

Authors:  Masayuki Futagami; Yoshihito Yokoyama; Muneaki Shimada; Shinya Sato; Etsuko Miyagi; Akiko Tozawa-Ono; Nao Suzuki; Masaki Fujimura; Yoichi Aoki; Satoru Sagae; Toru Sugiyama
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Coffee and tea consumption and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease and cancer: a pooled analysis of prospective studies from the Asia Cohort Consortium.

Authors:  Sangah Shin; Jung Eun Lee; Erikka Loftfield; Xiao-Ou Shu; Sarah Krull Abe; Md Shafiur Rahman; Eiko Saito; Md Rashedul Islam; Shoichiro Tsugane; Norie Sawada; Ichiro Tsuji; Seiki Kanemura; Yumi Sugawara; Yasutake Tomata; Atsuko Sadakane; Kotaro Ozasa; Isao Oze; Hidemi Ito; Myung-Hee Shin; Yoon-Ok Ahn; Sue K Park; Aesun Shin; Yong-Bing Xiang; Hui Cai; Woon-Puay Koh; Jian-Min Yuan; Keun-Young Yoo; Kee Seng Chia; Paolo Boffetta; Habibul Ahsan; Wei Zheng; Manami Inoue; Daehee Kang; John D Potter; Keitaro Matsuo; You-Lin Qiao; Nathaniel Rothman; Rashmi Sinha
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 9.685

4.  Association between body mass index and oesophageal cancer mortality: a pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies with >800 000 individuals in the Asia Cohort Consortium.

Authors:  Sangjun Lee; Jieun Jang; Sarah Krull Abe; Shafiur Rahman; Eiko Saito; Rashedul Islam; Prakash C Gupta; Norie Sawada; Akiko Tamakoshi; Xiao-Ou Shu; Woon-Puay Koh; Atsuko Sadakane; Ichiro Tsuji; Jeongseon Kim; Isao Oze; Chisato Nagata; San-Lin You; Myung-Hee Shin; Mangesh S Pednekar; Shoichiro Tsugane; Hui Cai; Jian-Min Yuan; Wanqing Wen; Kotaro Ozasa; Sanae Matsuyama; Seiki Kanemura; Aesun Shin; Hidemi Ito; Keiko Wada; Yumi Sugawara; Chien-Jen Chen; Yoon-Ok Ahn; Yu Chen; Habibul Ahsan; Paolo Boffetta; Kee Seng Chia; Keitaro Matsuo; You-Lin Qiao; Nathaniel Rothman; Wei Zheng; Manami Inoue; Daehee Kang; Sue K Park
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 9.685

5.  Associations of coffee and tea consumption with lung cancer risk.

Authors:  Jingjing Zhu; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Danxia Yu; Xuehong Zhang; William J Blot; Yong-Bing Xiang; Rashmi Sinha; Yikyung Park; Shoichiro Tsugane; Emily White; Woon-Puay Koh; Sue K Park; Norie Sawada; Seiki Kanemura; Yumi Sugawara; Ichiro Tsuji; Kim Robien; Yasutake Tomata; Keun-Young Yoo; Jeongseon Kim; Jian-Min Yuan; Yu-Tang Gao; Nathaniel Rothman; DeAnn Lazovich; Sarah K Abe; Md Shafiur Rahman; Erikka Loftfield; Yumie Takata; Xin Li; Jung Eun Lee; Eiko Saito; Neal D Freedman; Manami Inoue; Qing Lan; Walter C Willett; Wei Zheng; Xiao-Ou Shu
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 7.316

6.  Association between coffee consumption and all-sites cancer incidence and mortality.

Authors:  Junya Sado; Tetsuhisa Kitamura; Yuri Kitamura; Tomotaka Sobue; Yoshikazu Nishino; Hideo Tanaka; Tomio Nakayama; Ichiro Tsuji; Hidemi Ito; Takaichiro Suzuki; Kota Katanoda; Suketami Tominaga
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 6.716

7.  Impact of reproductive factors on breast cancer incidence: Pooled analysis of nine cohort studies in Japan.

Authors:  Taro Takeuchi; Yuri Kitamura; Tomotaka Sobue; Mai Utada; Kotaro Ozasa; Yumi Sugawara; Ichiro Tsuji; Miyuki Hori; Norie Sawada; Shoichiro Tsugane; Yuriko N Koyanagi; Hidemi Ito; Chaochen Wang; Akiko Tamakoshi; Keiko Wada; Chisato Nagata; Taichi Shimazu; Tetsuya Mizoue; Keitaro Matsuo; Mariko Naito; Keitaro Tanaka; Manami Inoue
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Validation of Identifying Cancer Diagnosis Based on Self-Reported Information in the Japan Nurses' Health Study.

Authors:  Kota Katanoda; Yuki Ideno; Naho Maruoka; Kazue Nagai; Yoichiro Tsukada; Mei Matsuki; Takahiro Higashi; Kunihiko Hayashi
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2022-02-01

9.  Reproductive and lifestyle factors related to breast cancer among Japanese women: An observational cohort study.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Yuri Kitamura; Tetsuhisa Kitamura; Tomotaka Sobue; Junya Sado; Yumi Sugawara; Keitaro Matsuo; Tomio Nakayama; Ichiro Tsuji; Hidemi Ito; Takaichiro Suzuki; Kota Katanoda; Suketami Tominaga
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.889

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.