Literature DB >> 19932248

Aortic valve replacement through a minimally invasive approach: preoperative planning, surgical technique, and outcome.

Andre Plass1, Hans Scheffel, Hatem Alkadhi, Philipp Kaufmann, Michele Genoni, Volkmar Falk, Jürg Grünenfelder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study reports the experiences of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) through a right minithoracotomy performed in the past 26 months and describes the surgical technique, the learning curve, the complication rate, and the patient outcomes.
METHODS: From March 2006 to June 2008, 172 patients (113 men; mean age, 71 +/- 12 years) were scheduled for MIAVR (6- to 7-cm incision). Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) imaging was used for surgical planning in 139. Aortic cannulation/clamping were performed through a right-sided minithoracotomy and venous cannulation percutaneously through the groin. For obtaining optimal intercostal space (ICS) distances between the incision to the aorta and cardiac structures, 2- and 3-dimensional MSCT images were evaluated.
RESULTS: Operations were done in 171 patients. MIAVR was successfully performed in 160 (94%). Six patients underwent a conventional operation due to adhesions in 4, small diameter of aortic annulus (17 mm) in 1, and concomitant coronary artery disease in 1. One patient was considered nonoperable. After CT-planning choice of second ICS in 17%, third in 81%, and fourth in 1%. Five conversions to sternotomy were necessary. Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 20 patients, including 1 death. Overall cardiopulmonary bypass was 158 +/- 41 min and cross-clamp time was 107 +/- 26 min. No blood products in 43% of MIAVR patients. Mean hospital length of stay was 10 +/- 3 days.
CONCLUSIONS: MIAVR demonstrates excellent results. A considerably reduced complication rate in the course was noted. MSCT for preoperative planning is helpful for an improved mental preparation and for an accurate surgical strategy, including optimal access.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19932248     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  17 in total

1.  Background-incorporated volumetric model for patient-specific surgical simulation: a segmentation-free, modeling-free framework.

Authors:  Kei Wai Cecilia Hung; Megumi Nakao; Koji Yoshimura; Kotaro Minato
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Complications and conversions in minimally invasive aortic valve surgery.

Authors:  Martin Moscoso Ludueña; Ardawan J Rastan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

Review 3.  Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Mattia Glauber; Matteo Ferrarini; Antonio Miceli
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

4.  Aortic Valve Replacement: Treatment by Sternotomy versus Minimally Invasive Approach.

Authors:  Renata Tosoni Rodrigues Ferreira; Roberto Rocha e Silva; Evaldo Marchi
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

Review 5.  The golden age of minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery: current and future perspectives.

Authors:  Alexander Iribarne; Rachel Easterwood; Edward Y H Chan; Jonathan Yang; Lori Soni; Mark J Russo; Craig R Smith; Michael Argenziano
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2011-05

6.  Review of minimal access versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement for patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Carson T Hoffmann; Jacob A Heiner; Tom C Nguyen
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09

7.  Anterolateral approach for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Toshinori Totsugawa; Masahiko Kuinose; Arudo Hiraoka; Hidenori Yoshitaka; Kentaro Tamura; Taichi Sakaguchi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-11-30

8.  Evaluation of Aortic Valve Replacement via the Right Parasternal Approach without Rib Removal.

Authors:  Akimasa Morisaki; Koji Hattori; Yasuyuki Kato; Manabu Motoki; Yosuke Takahashi; Shinsuke Nishimura; Toshihiko Shibata
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 1.520

9.  Right anterior mini-thoracotomy vs. conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a propensity-matched comparison.

Authors:  Mauro Del Giglio; Elisa Mikus; Roberto Nerla; Antonio Micari; Simone Calvi; Alberto Tripodi; Gianluca Campo; Elisa Maietti; Fausto Castriota; Alberto Cremonesi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Decision support system for the planning of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery.

Authors:  Hui Li; Miguel Castro; Pascal Haigron; Jean-Philippe Verhoye; Vito Giovanni Ruggieri
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.