Literature DB >> 20452497

Structural position of the posterior vagina and pelvic floor in women with and without posterior vaginal prolapse.

Christina Lewicky-Gaupp1, Aisha Yousuf, Kindra A Larson, Dee E Fenner, John O L Delancey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare pelvic structure location on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during maximal Valsalva among women with posterior prolapse and those with normal support. STUDY
DESIGN: Subjects (n=37) had posterior vaginal wall (PVW) prolapse of +1 cm or greater. All underwent midsagittal, dynamic MRI. Structure locations (distal vagina, apex, perineal body, external anal sphincter) were determined. PVW length, levator and urogenital hiatus diameters, and prolapse diameter were measured.
RESULTS: Subjects had more caudal structures (P<.001) and larger hiatus diameters (P<.005); the posterior wall was longer, whereas the straight-line distance between the apex and distal vagina was shorter. In enteroceles, the apex was more ventrally displaced compared with rectoceles (P=.003). Unlike apical descent (r=-0.3; P=.1), PVW length and point Bp were correlated with MRI prolapse size (r=0.5; P=.002; r=0.7; P<.001, respectively).
CONCLUSION: At maximal Valsalva on MRI, structures are more caudal in women with posterior prolapse. The posterior vaginal wall is longer; this length strongly correlates with prolapse size. Copyright (c) 2010. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20452497      PMCID: PMC3353257          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  29 in total

1.  MR imaging in posthysterectomy vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  R Tunn; S Paris; M Taupitz; B Hamm; W Fischer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2000

2.  Dynamic half Fourier acquisition, single shot turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the female pelvis.

Authors:  A E Gousse; Z L Barbaric; M H Safir; S Madjar; A K Marumoto; S Raz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Posterior compartment anatomy as seen in magnetic resonance imaging and 3-dimensional reconstruction from asymptomatic nulliparas.

Authors:  Yvonne Hsu; Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Female pelvic organ prolapse: a comparison of triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography.

Authors:  F M Kelvin; D D Maglinte; D S Hale; J T Benson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  MR imaging of levator ani muscle recovery following vaginal delivery.

Authors:  R Tunn; J O DeLancey; D Howard; J M Thorp; J A Ashton-Miller; L E Quint
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1999

6.  Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  R M Ellerkmann; G W Cundiff; C F Melick; M A Nihira; K Leffler; A E Bent
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Diagnosing enteroceles using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A Lienemann; C Anthuber; A Baron; M Reiser
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Practical MR imaging of female pelvic floor weakness.

Authors:  Julia R Fielding
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Incidence of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse 10 years following primary surgical management: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Michael F Fialkow; Katherine M Newton; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-08-06

10.  Collagen metabolism and turnover in women with stress urinary incontinence and pelvic prolapse.

Authors:  B H Chen; Y Wen; H Li; M L Polan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2002
View more
  17 in total

1.  Anterior and posterior compartment 3D endovaginal ultrasound anatomy based on direct histologic comparison.

Authors:  S Abbas Shobeiri; Dena White; Lieschen H Quiroz; Mikio A Nihira
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Posterior vaginal compartment repairs: Where are the main anatomical defects?

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Sushen Naidoo; Stephen J Kerr; Chin H Yong; Warwick Birrell
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  The rectovaginal septum: visible on magnetic resonance images of women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (Müllerian agenesis).

Authors:  Markus Huebner; Katharina Rall; Sara Yvonne Brucker; Christl Reisenauer; Katja Claudia Siegmann-Luz; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging before and 6 months after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Robin M F van der Weiden; Elena Rociu; Guido H H Mannaerts; Marcel H A van Hooff; Mark E Vierhout; Mariella I J Withagen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Structural, functional, and symptomatic differences between women with rectocele versus cystocele and normal support.

Authors:  Mitchell B Berger; Giselle E Kolenic; Dee E Fenner; Daniel M Morgan; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Interactions among pelvic organ protrusion, levator ani descent, and hiatal enlargement in women with and without prolapse.

Authors:  Anne G Sammarco; Lahari Nandikanti; Emily K Kobernik; Bing Xie; Alexandra Jankowski; Carolyn W Swenson; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Perineorrhaphy quantitative assessment (Pe-QA).

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Mayada Younis; Sushen Naidoo; Warwick Birrell
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Posterior repair quantification (PR-Q) using key anatomical indicators (KAI): preliminary report.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Dianne Avery; Tin Lok Chiu; Warwick Birrell
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Comparison of measurement systems for posterior vaginal wall prolapse on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Bing Xie; Luyun Chen; Zhuowei Xue; Emily M English; Dee E Fenner; Kara Gaetke-Udager; Giselle E Kolenic; James A Ashton-Miller; John O DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Posterior vaginal prolapse shape and position changes at maximal Valsalva seen in 3-D MRI-based models.

Authors:  Jiajia Luo; Kindra A Larson; Dee E Fenner; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.