Literature DB >> 10696895

Diagnosing enteroceles using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.

A Lienemann1, C Anthuber, A Baron, M Reiser.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Enteroceles are in part difficult to detect but a frequent finding in pelvic floor disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate magnetic resonance colpocystorectography in the diagnosis of enteroceles.
METHODS: In this prospective study 11 volunteers and 55 patients with pelvic floor descent were examined. In addition to magnetic resonance colpocystorectography, a dynamic cystoproctography was performed on 34 patients. Opacification of organs was used. An enterocele was assessed in relationship to the pubococcygeal reference line (magnetic resonance colpocystorectography) or the width of the rectovaginal space (dynamic cystoproctography). A clinical gynecologic examination served as reference.
RESULTS: The clinical examination diagnosed an enterocele in 43, magnetic resonance colpocystorectography in 49, and dynamic cystoproctography in 14 cases. Magnetic resonance colpocystorectography further subdivided the enteroceles according to their contents (mesenteric fat or fluid, 12; small bowel, 32, large bowel, 3; and rectosigmoidocele, 2). Magnetic resonance colpocystorectography proved statistically significantly superior to dynamic cystoproctography (15 cases) and the reference. Sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance colpocystorectography were 100 percent each. It was able to reveal clinically missed enteroceles as being peritoneoceles associated with a rectocele or a uterovaginal prolapse (10 cases).
CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance colpocystorectography is a promising method for diagnosis of enteroceles, because hernial canal, sac, and contents are reliably identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10696895     DOI: 10.1007/bf02236984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  15 in total

Review 1.  Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management.

Authors:  A P Zbar; A Lienemann; H Fritsch; M Beer-Gabel; M Pescatori
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Structural position of the posterior vagina and pelvic floor in women with and without posterior vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; Aisha Yousuf; Kindra A Larson; Dee E Fenner; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  MRI of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Harpreet K Pannu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Dynamic pelvic three-dimensional computed tomography for investigation of pelvic abnormalities in patients with rectocele and rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Norihiro Okamoto; Koutarou Maeda; Ryoichi Kato; Shyoshi Senga; Harunobu Sato; Ryuji Hosono
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Correlation between posterior vaginal wall defects assessed by clinical examination and by defecography.

Authors:  Annette G Groenendijk; Victor P van der Hulst; Erwin Birnie; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-05-09

Review 6.  The current role of imaging techniques in faecal incontinence.

Authors:  M P Terra; J Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  International Urogynecological Consultation: clinical definition of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; Michele O'Shea; Nicola Dykes; Olga Ramm; Autumn Edenfield; Ka Lai Shek; Kim van Delft; Molly Beestrum; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  Diagnostic clues, pitfalls, and imaging characteristics of '-celes' that arise in abdominal and pelvic structures.

Authors:  Sitthipong Srisajjakul; Patcharin Prapaisilp; Sirikan Bangchokdee
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11

9.  Dynamic magnetic resonance defecography in 10 asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Andreas G Schreyer; Christian Paetzel; Alois Fürst; Lena M Dendl; Elisabeth Hutzel; René Müller-Wille; Philipp Wiggermann; Stephan Schleder; Christian Stroszczynski; Patrick Hoffstetter
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance defecography versus clinical examination and fluoroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Ramage; C Simillis; C Yen; C Lutterodt; S Qiu; E Tan; C Kontovounisios; P Tekkis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.