Literature DB >> 18241813

Posterior compartment anatomy as seen in magnetic resonance imaging and 3-dimensional reconstruction from asymptomatic nulliparas.

Yvonne Hsu1, Christina Lewicky-Gaupp, John O L DeLancey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to identify characteristic anatomical features of the posterior compartment using magnetic resonance (MR) cross-sectional anatomy and 3-dimensional (3-D) modeling. STUDY
DESIGN: Supine, static proton-density MR images of 20 nulliparas were analyzed. MR images were used to create models in a selected exemplar.
RESULTS: The compartment's upper, mid, and lower segments are best seen in the axial plane. It is bounded inferiorly by the perineal body, ventrally by the posterior vaginal wall, and dorsally by the levator ani muscles and coccyx. In the upper portion, the compartment is bordered laterally by the uterosacral ligaments, whereas in the middle portion, there is more direct contact with the lateral levator ani muscles. In the lower portion, the contact becomes obliterated because the vagina and levator ani muscles become fused to each another and to the perineal body.
CONCLUSION: The posterior compartment has characteristic anatomic features in MR cross-sectional anatomy that can be further elucidated and integrated with 3-D anatomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18241813      PMCID: PMC2876342          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  21 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging and 3-dimensional analysis of external anal sphincter anatomy.

Authors:  Yvonne Hsu; Dee E Fenner; William J Weadock; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Appearance of the levator ani muscle subdivisions in magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Rebecca U Margulies; Yvonne Hsu; Rohna Kearney; Tamara Stein; Wolfgang H Umek; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Levator plate angle in women with pelvic organ prolapse compared to women with normal support using dynamic MR imaging.

Authors:  Yvonne Hsu; Aimee Summers; Hero K Hussain; Kenneth E Guire; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Comparison of the main body of the external anal sphincter muscle cross-sectional area between women with and without prolapse.

Authors:  Yvonne Hsu; Markus Huebner; Luyun Chen; Dee E Fenner; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-03-17

5.  Uterosacral ligament vault suspension: five-year outcomes.

Authors:  W Andre Silva; Rachel N Pauls; Jeffrey L Segal; Christopher M Rooney; Steven D Kleeman; Mickey M Karram
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  Evaluation and treatment of women with rectocele: focus on associated defecatory and sexual dysfunction.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Cundiff; Dee Fenner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Surgical management of prolapse of the anterior vaginal segment: an analysis of support defects, operative morbidity, and anatomic outcome.

Authors:  B L Shull; S J Benn; T J Kuehl
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair.

Authors:  G W Cundiff; A C Weidner; A G Visco; W A Addison; R C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the levator ani with anatomic correlation.

Authors:  K Strohbehn; J H Ellis; J A Strohbehn; J O DeLancey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  MRI of the anal sphincter.

Authors:  N M deSouza; R Puni; W A Kmiot; C I Bartram; A S Hall; G M Bydder
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  16 in total

1.  Structural position of the posterior vagina and pelvic floor in women with and without posterior vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; Aisha Yousuf; Kindra A Larson; Dee E Fenner; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Anterior and posterior compartment 3D endovaginal ultrasound anatomy based on direct histologic comparison.

Authors:  S Abbas Shobeiri; Dena White; Lieschen H Quiroz; Mikio A Nihira
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Normal vulvovaginal, perineal, and pelvic anatomy with reconstructive considerations.

Authors:  Sujata Yavagal; Thais F de Farias; Carlos A Medina; Peter Takacs
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 4.  Traditional native tissue versus mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature.

Authors:  E J Stanford; A Cassidenti; M D Moen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Laparoscopic sacral colpoperineopexy: abdominal versus abdominal-vaginal posterior graft attachment.

Authors:  Colleen D McDermott; Jean Park; Colin L Terry; Patrick J Woodman; Douglass S Hale
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  The rectovaginal septum: visible on magnetic resonance images of women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (Müllerian agenesis).

Authors:  Markus Huebner; Katharina Rall; Sara Yvonne Brucker; Christl Reisenauer; Katja Claudia Siegmann-Luz; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Do repetitive Valsalva maneuvers change maximum prolapse on dynamic MRI?

Authors:  Julie A Tumbarello; Yvonne Hsu; Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; Suzan Rohrer; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  Anatomy and histology of apical support: a literature review concerning cardinal and uterosacral ligaments.

Authors:  Rajeev Ramanah; Mitchell B Berger; Bernard M Parratte; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Measurements from image-based three dimensional pelvic floor reconstruction: a study of inter- and intraobserver reliability.

Authors:  Lennox Hoyte; Linda Brubaker; Julia R Fielding; Mark E Lockhart; Marta E Heilbrun; Caryl G Salomon; Wen Ye; Morton B Brown
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  A multi-compartment 3-D finite element model of rectocele and its interaction with cystocele.

Authors:  Jiajia Luo; Luyun Chen; Dee E Fenner; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.