Literature DB >> 2044970

The effect of background intensity on the components of fluctuation as determined by threshold-related automated perimetry.

H H Crosswell1, W C Stewart, M A Cascairo, H H Hunt.   

Abstract

We studied the effect of various background intensities on the components of fluctuation by testing 20 healthy subjects on the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Our results show little difference in the total fluctuation between two low photopic background intensities similar to those commonly used on commercial perimeters: 3.02 dB for 31.5 apostilbs (asb) and 2.77 dB for 3.15 asb. However, an increase in total fluctuation (3.74 dB for 0.315 asb and 4.24 dB for 0.0315 asb) as well as in its short-term, long-term heterogeneous, and interindividual components was seen at mesopic background intensities as compared with the low photopic range. This study suggests that in healthy individuals, little difference exists in the fluctuation resulting from differences in background intensities commonly used on commercial perimeters, whereas mesopic illumination may increase the variability of threshold responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2044970     DOI: 10.1007/bf00170542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  13 in total

1.  [The perimetry in oto-neoro-ophthalmology.].

Authors:  H Goldmann
Journal:  Confin Neurol       Date:  1954

2.  Threshold fluctuations in the Humphrey Field Analyzer and in the Octopus automated perimeter.

Authors:  F Fankhauser; H Bebie; J Flammer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field.

Authors:  A Heijl; G Lindgren; J Olsson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-11

4.  Single and multiple stimulus static perimetry in glaucoma; the two phases of perimetry. Thesis.

Authors:  E L Greve
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  [Kinetic perimetry].

Authors:  F Fankhauser
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1969       Impact factor: 3.250

6.  A static perimetric technique believed to test receptive field properties. 3. Clinical trials.

Authors:  R N Sunga; J M Enoch
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Fluctuations on the Humphrey and Octopus perimeters.

Authors:  R S Brenton; W A Argus
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Differential light threshold in automated static perimetry. Factors influencing short-term fluctuation.

Authors:  J Flammer; S M Drance; F Fankhauser; L Augustiny
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-06

9.  Changes in differential threshold in patients with glaucoma during prolonged perimetry.

Authors:  A Heijl; S M Drance
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma.

Authors:  J Flammer; S M Drance; M Zulauf
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-05
View more
  1 in total

1.  The influence of stimulus parameters on the visual field indices by automated projection perimetry.

Authors:  M Dengler-Harles; J M Wild; M D Cole; E C O'Neill
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.117

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.