Literature DB >> 3570687

Fluctuations on the Humphrey and Octopus perimeters.

R S Brenton, W A Argus.   

Abstract

Fluctuation of threshold determinations must be considered when evaluating visual field abnormalities. The short- and long-term threshold fluctuation were measured on 36 normal subjects using the Octopus and Humphrey automated perimeters. Subjects were tested using similar threshold programs that tested 16 locations twice. Short-term fluctuation was greater on the Octopus perimeter (1.6 +/- 0.3 dB) than on the Humphrey perimeter (1.3 +/- 0.3 dB; P less than 0.001). The heterogenous long-term fluctuation was greater on the Octopus perimeter (1.6 +/- 0.4 dB) than on the Humphrey perimeter (1.3 +/- 0.5 dB; P less than 0.05). The homogenous long-term fluctuation was near 0 for both machines. There are numerous variables that can alter the reproducibility of perimetry. Reproducibility can be estimated by short- and long-term fluctuation, but differences between the Octopus and Humphrey also influence their fluctuation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3570687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  9 in total

1.  Static threshold variability in the peripheral visual field in normal subjects.

Authors:  W O Young; W C Stewart; H Hunt; H Crosswell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Responses of primate retinal ganglion cells to perimetric stimuli.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Hao Sun; Barry B Lee; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Regional correlation among ganglion cell complex, nerve fiber layer, and visual field loss in glaucoma.

Authors:  Phuc V Le; Ou Tan; Vikas Chopra; Brian A Francis; Omar Ragab; Rohit Varma; David Huang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  The influence of stimulus parameters on the visual field indices by automated projection perimetry.

Authors:  M Dengler-Harles; J M Wild; M D Cole; E C O'Neill
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Normal visual fields measured with Octopus-Program G1. II. Global visual field indices.

Authors:  M Zulauf; R P LeBlanc; J Flammer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for parasellar meningiomas: a preliminary report of visual outcomes.

Authors:  R S Behbehani; T McElveen; R C Sergott; D W Andrews; P J Savino
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  The effect of background intensity on the components of fluctuation as determined by threshold-related automated perimetry.

Authors:  H H Crosswell; W C Stewart; M A Cascairo; H H Hunt
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Visual Field Inference From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Comparison Between Devices.

Authors:  Jonghoon Shin; Sungjoon Kim; Jinmi Kim; Keunheung Park
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Home-based visual field test for glaucoma screening comparison with Humphrey perimeter.

Authors:  Stylianos Tsapakis; Dimitrios Papaconstantinou; Andreas Diagourtas; Stylianos Kandarakis; Konstantinos Droutsas; Konstantinos Andreanos; Dimitrios Brouzas
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.