Literature DB >> 20444725

Influence of pacing configurations, body mass index, and position of coronary sinus lead on frequency of phrenic nerve stimulation and pacing thresholds under cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Martin Seifert1, Thomas Schau, Viviane Moeller, Michael Neuss, Juergen Meyhoefer, Christian Butter.   

Abstract

AIMS: Phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) can affect, and in some cases considerably limit, the long-term success of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) therapy. To address this common problem, the manufacturers of CRT devices offer a range of configurations aimed at preventing high left ventricular pacing thresholds (LVPTs) and PNS. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 101 consecutive patients who had undergone implantation of a CRT system, we investigated prospectively the parameters LVPT and PNS threshold in relation to coronary sinus (CS) lead position, CS lead configuration, body position, and body mass index. With the configurations LV tip to right ventricular (RV) coil, LV tip to LV ring, and LV ring to RV coil, the LVPT and PNS threshold of patients with LV pacing were measured in the supine and left lateral body positions. The overall mean LVPT was lowest in LV tip to RV coil and highest in LV ring to RV coil configurations. The lowest PNS thresholds were measured in LV tip to RV coil and the highest in LV tip to ring configurations. The LVPT was not affected by body position and was stable in the standard supine and left lateral positions.
CONCLUSION: Flexible LV pacing configurations are a useful feature of CRT systems for preventing PNS. The optimal LV pacing configuration should be determined on the basis of individual patient testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20444725     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euq119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  18 in total

1.  Monitoring biventricular pacing parameters depending on the left ventricle lead configuration.

Authors:  Antonin Prochazka; David Korpas
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2013

2.  [Technical innovations and limitation in cardiac electrotherapy].

Authors:  H-H Minden
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2011-03

3.  A Meta-Analysis Of Quadripolar Versus Bipolar Left Ventricular Leads On Post-Procedural Outcomes.

Authors:  Mohit K Turagam; Muhammad R Afzal; Sandia Iskander; Luigi Di Biase; Andrea Natale; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-08-31

Review 4.  [Leadless endocardial ultrasound based left ventricular stimulation : WISE CRT System: alternative to conventional methods].

Authors:  C Butter; S Fehrendt; V Möller; M Seifert
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-11-08

Review 5.  Are electronic cardiac devices still evolving?

Authors:  G Carrault; P Mabo
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-15

Review 6.  Phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Ghassan Moubarak; Abdeslam Bouzeman; Jacky Ollitrault; Frederic Anselme; Serge Cazeau
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Comparison of different pacing strategies to minimize phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jose F Huizar; Karoly Kaszala; Jayanthi N Koneru; Leroy R Thacker; Kenneth A Ellenbogen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-04-26

8.  Single-center experience of a quadripolar pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Antonello Vado; Endrj Menardi; Guido Rossetti; Gianpaolo Ballari; Mauro Feola; Marco Bobbio
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Phrenic nerve stimulation in CRT patients and benefits of electronic lead repositioning: the ERACE trial.

Authors:  Stephan Goetze; Pascal Defaye; Alexander Bauer; Matthias Merkel; Olivier Bizeau; Sven Treusch; Klaus Contzen; Claus Juenger; Joachim Winter
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Acute changes in electromechanical parameters during different pacing configurations using a quadripolar left ventricular lead.

Authors:  Cinzia Valzania; Maria J Eriksson; Mauro Biffi; Giuseppe Boriani; Fredrik Gadler
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.