Literature DB >> 23818121

Acute changes in electromechanical parameters during different pacing configurations using a quadripolar left ventricular lead.

Cinzia Valzania1, Maria J Eriksson, Mauro Biffi, Giuseppe Boriani, Fredrik Gadler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads allow for several pacing configurations in candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Whether different pacing configurations may affect LV dyssynchrony and systolic function is not completely known. We aimed to evaluate the acute effects of different pacing vectors on LV electromechanical parameters in patients implanted with a quadripolar LV lead.
METHODS: In this two-centre study, within 1 month of implantation 21 CRT patients (65 ± 8 years, 76 % men, 38 % ischemic) receiving a quadripolar LV lead (Quartet 1458Q, St Jude Medical) underwent LV capture threshold assessment, intracardiac electrogram optimization, and two-dimensional echocardiography during four pacing configurations: D1-P4, P4-RV coil, D1-RV coil, and P4-M2. LV dyssynchrony and contractile function were expressed by septal-to-lateral delay and global longitudinal strain (GLS).
RESULTS: LV capture threshold varied between the configurations (P < 0.001), showing higher values in the configurations P4-RV coil and P4-M2. Septal-to-lateral delay decreased in the configurations D1-P4 and D1-RV coil (P = 0.003 and P = 0.033 vs. spontaneous rhythm, respectively). GLS improved significantly vs. spontaneous rhythm only in the configuration D1-P4 (from -8.6 ± 3.5 to -11.0 ± 3.2 %, P = 0.001). Accordingly, an increase in stroke volume and a decrease in mitral regurgitation were observed in the configuration D1-P4 (P ≤ 0.001 vs. spontaneous rhythm).
CONCLUSIONS: In CRT patients receiving a quadripolar LV lead, significant variations in electromechanical parameters were observed by changing pacing vector. Individually targeting the optimal pacing site may enhance the acute haemodynamic response to CRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23818121     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-013-9812-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  31 in total

1.  2010 focused update of ESC Guidelines on device therapy in heart failure: an update of the 2008 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure and the 2007 ESC Guidelines for cardiac and resynchronization therapy. Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association and the European Heart Rhythm Association.

Authors:  Kenneth Dickstein; Panos E Vardas; Angelo Auricchio; Jean-Claude Daubert; Cecilia Linde; John McMurray; Piotr Ponikowski; Silvia Giuliana Priori; Richard Sutton; Dirk J van Veldhuisen
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 15.534

2.  Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  Lawrence G Rudski; Wyman W Lai; Jonathan Afilalo; Lanqi Hua; Mark D Handschumacher; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Scott D Solomon; Eric K Louie; Nelson B Schiller
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  Elimination of phrenic nerve stimulation occurring during CRT: follow-up in patients implanted with a novel quadripolar pacing lead.

Authors:  Paresh A Mehta; Anoop K Shetty; Mark Squirrel; Julian Bostock; C Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Changes in global left ventricular function by multidirectional strain assessment in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Victoria Delgado; Claudia Ypenburg; Qing Zhang; Sjoerd A Mollema; Jeffrey Wing-Hong Fung; Martin J Schalij; Cheuk-Man Yu; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.251

5.  Requirement for coronary sinus lead interventions and effectiveness of endovascular replacement during long-term follow-up after implantation of a resynchronization device.

Authors:  C Jan Willem Borleffs; Rutger J van Bommel; Sander G Molhoek; Joost G de Leeuw; Martin J Schalij; Lieselot van Erven
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  Pacing electrode selection in a quadripolar left heart lead determines presence or absence of phrenic nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Bernard Thibault; Edward Karst; Kyungmoo Ryu; Patrice Paiement; Taraneh G Farazi
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Global 2-dimensional strain as a new prognosticator in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Goo-Yeong Cho; Thomas H Marwick; Hyun-Sook Kim; Min-Kyu Kim; Kyung-Soon Hong; Dong-Jin Oh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure.

Authors:  John G F Cleland; Jean-Claude Daubert; Erland Erdmann; Nick Freemantle; Daniel Gras; Lukas Kappenberger; Luigi Tavazzi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Hemodynamic benefit of multiple programmable pacing configurations in patients with biventricular pacemakers.

Authors:  Ramprakash Balasundaram; Hygriv B Rao; C Sridevi; B Somaraju; Balbir Singh; Narasimhan Calambur
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  The acute hemodynamic response to LV pacing within individual branches of the coronary sinus using a quadripolar lead.

Authors:  Anoop K Shetty; Simon G Duckett; Ying Liang Ma; Stamatis Kapetanakis; Matthew Ginks; Julian Bostock; Gerald Carr-White; Kawal Rhode; Reza Razavi; C Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 1.976

View more
  4 in total

1.  Left ventricular or biventricular pacing? Single or multielectrode leads? An implanter's viewpoint.

Authors:  Kamal K Sethi; Kabir Sethi; Surendra K Chutani
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Clinical outcome of left ventricular multipoint pacing versus conventional biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Hu; Lihui Zheng; Ligang Ding; Zhongpeng Du; Erpeng Liang; Lingmin Wu; Gang Chen; Xiaohan Fan; Yan Yao; Yu Jiang
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  The impact of the left ventricular pacing polarity and localization during cardiac resynchronization therapy on depolarization and repolarization parameters.

Authors:  Emin Evren Özcan; Ali Öztürk; Erdem Özel; Ömer Senarslan; Bela Merkely; Laszlo Geller
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 1.596

Review 4.  The Role of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for the Management of Functional Mitral Regurgitation.

Authors:  Eleonora Russo; Giulio Russo; Mauro Cassese; Maurizio Braccio; Massimo Carella; Paolo Compagnucci; Antonio Dello Russo; Michela Casella
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 7.666

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.