Literature DB >> 24934757

Phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Ghassan Moubarak1, Abdeslam Bouzeman, Jacky Ollitrault, Frederic Anselme, Serge Cazeau.   

Abstract

In cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the electrical impulse delivered by the left ventricular (LV) lead may incidentally cause phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS). The purpose of this state-of-the-art review is to describe the frequency, risk factors, and clinical consequences of PNS and to present the most recent options to successfully manage PNS. PNS occurs in 2 to 37% of implanted patients and is not always detected in the supine position during implantation. Lateral and posterior veins are at higher risk of PNS than anterior veins, and apical positions are at higher risk of PNS than basal positions. The management of PNS discovered during implantation may include mapping the course of the target vein in order to find a PNS-free site, targeting another vein if available, and pacing with alternative configurations before changing the lead location. Non-invasive options for management of post-operative PNS depend on the difference between PNS and LV stimulation thresholds and include reducing the LV pacing output, automatic determination of LV stimulation threshold and minimal output delivery by the device, increasing the pulse duration, and electronic repositioning. New quadripolar leads allow to pace from different cathodes, and the multiple pacing configurations available have proved superior to bipolar leads in mitigating PNS. This electronic repositioning addresses almost all of the clinically relevant PNS and should markedly reduce the need for invasive lead repositioning or CRT abandon, which is actually the last option for 2% of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24934757     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-014-9917-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  40 in total

1.  Six year experience of transvenous left ventricular lead implantation for permanent biventricular pacing in patients with advanced heart failure: technical aspects.

Authors:  C Alonso; C Leclercq; F R d'Allonnes; D Pavin; F Victor; P Mabo; J C Daubert
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  The effect of electronic repositioning on left ventricular pacing and phrenic nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Jean Champagne; Jeffrey S Healey; Andrew D Krahn; Francois Philippon; Osnat Gurevitz; Anne Swearingen; Michael Glikson
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  Thoracoscopic patch insulation to correct phrenic nerve stimulation secondary to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Neeraj Mediratta; Diane Barker; James McKevith; Peter Davies; Sandra Belchambers; Archana Rao
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  Isolation of the phrenic nerve to suppress diaphragmatic contraction induced by cardiac resynchronization.

Authors:  Fabien Doguet; Charlotte Honoré; Bénédicte Godin; Frédéric Anselme
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-03-27

5.  Initial single-center experience of a quadripolar pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Anoop K Shetty; Simon G Duckett; Julian Bostock; Debashis Roy; Matthew Ginks; Shoaib Hamid; Eric Rosenthal; Reza Razavi; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Elimination of phrenic nerve stimulation occurring during CRT: follow-up in patients implanted with a novel quadripolar pacing lead.

Authors:  Paresh A Mehta; Anoop K Shetty; Mark Squirrel; Julian Bostock; C Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Clinical efficacy of left ventricular pacing vector programmability in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator patients for management of phrenic nerve stimulation and/or elevated left ventricular pacing thresholds: insights from the Efface Phrenic Stim study.

Authors:  Norbert Klein; Maika Klein; Heinrich Weglage; Oliver Przibille; Sven Fischer; Hans-Joachim Trappe; Frank Birkenhauer; Dietrich Pfeiffer
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.214

8.  Left ventricular lead performance in cardiac resynchronization therapy: impact of lead localization and complications.

Authors:  Andi Eie Albertsen; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Anders Kirstein Pedersen; Peter Steen Hansen; Henrik Kjaerulf Jensen; Peter Thomas Mortensen
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Automatic management of left ventricular stimulation: hints for technologic improvement.

Authors:  Mauro Biffi; Matteo Bertini; Davide Saporito; Matteo Ziacchi; Silvia Stabellini; Sergio Valsecchi; Valeria Ricci; Giuseppe Boriani
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Short-spaced dipole for managing phrenic nerve stimulation in patients with CRT: the "phrenic nerve mapping and stimulation EP" catheter study.

Authors:  Mauro Biffi; Francesco Zanon; Emanuele Bertaglia; Luigi Padeletti; Annamaria Varbaro; Tiziana De Santo; Giuseppe Boriani; Zhongping Yang
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 6.343

View more
  3 in total

1.  Diaphragmatic stimulation caused by cardiac resynchronization treatment.

Authors:  Rahman Shah; Zoe Qualls
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Thoracoscopic Patch Insulation for Phrenic Nerve Stimulation after Permanent Pacemaker Implantation.

Authors:  Yoonjin Kang; Eung Rae Kim; Jae Gun Kwak; Woong-Han Kim
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-10-05

3.  Phrenic nerve stimulation, a rare complication of pacemaker: A case report.

Authors:  Meddy Dalex; Astrid Malezieux; Thibault Parent; Dina Zekry; Christine Serratrice
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.