Literature DB >> 31772318

Genetic homogeneity in the face of morphological heterogeneity in the harbor porpoise from the Black Sea and adjacent waters (Phocoena phocoena relicta).

Yacine Ben Chehida1, Julie Thumloup1, Karina Vishnyakova2, Pavel Gol'din3, Michael C Fontaine4,5.   

Abstract

Absence of genetic differentiation is usually taken as an evidence of panmixia, but can also reflect other situations, including even nearly complete demographic independence among large-sized populations. Deciphering which situation applies has major practical implications (e.g., in conservation biology). The endangered harbor porpoises in the Black Sea illustrates this point well. While morphological heterogeneity suggested that population differentiation may exist between individuals from the Black and Azov seas, no genetic study provided conclusive evidence or covered the entire subspecies range. Here, we assessed the genetic structure at ten microsatellite loci and a 3904 base-pairs mitochondrial fragment in 144 porpoises across the subspecies range (i.e., Aegean, Marmara, Black, and Azov seas). Analyses of the genetic structure, including FST, Bayesian clustering, and multivariate analyses revealed a nearly complete genetic homogeneity. Power analyses rejected the possibility of underpowered analyses (power to detect FST ≥ 0.008 at microsatellite loci). Simulations under various demographic models, evaluating the evolution of FST, showed that a time-lag effect between demographic and genetic subdivision is also unlikely. With a realistic effective population size of 1000 individuals, the expected "gray zone" would be at most 20 generations under moderate levels of gene flow (≤10 migrants per generation). After excluding alternative hypotheses, panmixia remains the most likely hypothesis explaining the genetic homogeneity in the Black Sea porpoises. Morphological heterogeneity may thus reflect other processes than population subdivision (e.g., plasticity, selection). This study illustrates how combining empirical and theoretical approaches can contribute to understanding patterns of weak population structure in highly mobile marine species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31772318      PMCID: PMC7028986          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-019-0284-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  52 in total

1.  Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies.

Authors:  H J Bandelt; P Forster; A Röhl
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Landscape genetics in a changing world: disentangling historical and contemporary influences and inferring change.

Authors:  Clinton W Epps; Nusha Keyghobadi
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study.

Authors:  G Evanno; S Regnaut; J Goudet
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Performance of marker-based relatedness estimators in natural populations of outbred vertebrates.

Authors:  Katalin Csilléry; Toby Johnson; Dario Beraldi; Tim Clutton-Brock; Dave Coltman; Bengt Hansson; Goran Spong; Josephine M Pemberton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Species concepts and species delimitation.

Authors:  Kevin De Queiroz
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows.

Authors:  Laurent Excoffier; Heidi E L Lischer
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.090

8.  jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing.

Authors:  Diego Darriba; Guillermo L Taboada; Ramón Doallo; David Posada
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Epigenetics, plasticity, and evolution: How do we link epigenetic change to phenotype?

Authors:  Elizabeth J Duncan; Peter D Gluckman; Peter K Dearden
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.656

10.  The influence of family groups on inferences made with the program Structure.

Authors:  E C Anderson; K K Dunham
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.090

View more
  1 in total

1.  No leading-edge effect in North Atlantic harbor porpoises: Evolutionary and conservation implications.

Authors:  Yacine Ben Chehida; Roisin Loughnane; Julie Thumloup; Kristin Kaschner; Cristina Garilao; Patricia E Rosel; Michael C Fontaine
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 5.183

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.