Literature DB >> 20438566

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting a positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy session in the era of extended prostate sampling.

Ayman S Moussa1, J Stephen Jones, Changhong Yu, Khaled Fareed, Michael W Kattan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To create a nomogram for predicting the probability of a positive biopsy in men with one or more previous negative biopsies, as the false-negative rate of prostate biopsy in contemporary series remains substantial, and there is a need to identify those with a negative result but with a high risk of having unrecognized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 408 patients from Cleveland Clinic who had one or more repeat biopsies after an initial negative biopsy from 1999 to 2008. Another 470 men with the same criteria were used to validate the nomogram. Nomogram variables included age, family history of prostate cancer, body mass index, findings on a digital rectal examination, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, PSA slope, total prostate volume, months from initial negative biopsy session, months from previous negative biopsy, cumulative number of negative cores previously taken and history of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical small acinar proliferation. We calculated the nomogram predicted probability in each patient. These predicted outcomes were compared with the actual biopsy results. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated as a measure of discrimination.
RESULTS: The mean number of previous negative biopsies was 1.5, and the mean number of cores per session was 19.1. Of the original development data, 129 men (31.6%) had prostate cancer. A nomogram was constructed that had a concordance index of 0.72, which was greater than any single risk factor. In the validation group the area under the ROC curve was 0.62.
CONCLUSIONS: Our nomogram for predicting a positive repeat biopsy can provide important additional information to aid the urologist and patient with a negative biopsy in evaluating clinical options.
© 2010 DRUG SAFETY RESEARCH UNIT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20438566     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09362.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  10 in total

Review 1.  Addressing the need for repeat prostate biopsy: new technology and approaches.

Authors:  Michael L Blute; E Jason Abel; Tracy M Downs; Frederick Kelcz; David F Jarrard
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Use of the Prostate Core Mitomic Test in Repeated Biopsy Decision-Making: Real-World Assessment of Clinical Utility in a Multicenter Patient Population.

Authors:  Lorena Legisi; Elise DeSa; M Nasar Qureshi
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2016-12

Review 3.  The role of biomarkers in the assessment of prostate cancer risk prior to prostate biopsy: which markers matter and how should they be used?

Authors:  Marianne Schmid; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Markus Graefen; Margit Fisch; Felix K Chun; Jens Hansen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Beyond PSA: the next generation of prostate cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  John R Prensner; Mark A Rubin; John T Wei; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Human kallikrein-2 gene and protein expression predicts prostate cancer at repeat biopsy.

Authors:  Raj Satkunasivam; William Zhang; John Trachtenberg; Ants Toi; Changhong Yu; Eleftherios Diamandis; Michael W Kattan; Steven A Narod; Robert K Nam
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-06-11

6.  Clinicopathologic differences between prostate cancers detected during initial and repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in Korea.

Authors:  Dong Jin Park; Ki Ho Kim; Tae Gwon Kwon; Chun Ii Kim; Cheol Hee Park; Jae Shin Park; Duck Youn Kim; Jae Soo Kim; Ki Hak Moon; Kyung Seop Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-11-10

Review 7.  Risk calculators and updated tools to select and plan a repeat biopsy for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Igor Sorokin; Badar M Mian
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 8.  Clinical and pathologic factors predicting reclassification in active surveillance cohorts.

Authors:  Pablo S Sierra; Shivashankar Damodaran; David Jarrard
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

9.  MultiParametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeat Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Cong Huang; Gang Song; He Wang; Guangjie Ji; Jie Li; Yuke Chen; Yu Fan; Dong Fang; Gengyan Xiong; Zhongcheng Xin; Liqun Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Biomarkers in previous histologically negative prostate biopsies can be helpful in repeat biopsy decision-making processes.

Authors:  Xingbo Long; Longxiang Wu; Xiting Zeng; Zhijian Wu; Xiheng Hu; Huichuan Jiang; Zhengtong Lv; Changzhao Yang; Yi Cai; Keda Yang; Yuan Li
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 4.452

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.