Literature DB >> 22461644

Beyond PSA: the next generation of prostate cancer biomarkers.

John R Prensner1, Mark A Rubin, John T Wei, Arul M Chinnaiyan.   

Abstract

Since the introduction of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening 25 years ago, prostate cancer diagnosis and management have been guided by this biomarker. Yet, PSA has proven controversial as a screening assay owing to several inherent limitations. The next wave of prostate cancer biomarkers has emerged, introducing new assays in serum and urine that may supplement or, in time, replace PSA because of their higher cancer specificity. This expanding universe of biomarkers has been facilitated, in large part, by new genomic technologies that have enabled an unbiased look at cancer biology. Such efforts have produced several notable success stories that involve rapidly moving biomarkers from the bench to the clinic. However, biomarker research has centered on disease diagnostics, rather than prognosis and prediction, which would address disease management. The development of biomarkers to stratify risk of prostate cancer aggressiveness at the time of screening remains the greatest unmet clinical need in prostate cancer. We review the current state of prostate cancer biomarker research, including the PSA revolution, its impact on early cancer detection, the recent advances in biomarker discovery, and the future efforts that promise to improve clinical management of this disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22461644      PMCID: PMC3799996          DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  98 in total

Review 1.  The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects.

Authors:  N Leigh Anderson; Norman G Anderson
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  W J Catalona; A W Partin; K M Slawin; M K Brawer; R C Flanigan; A Patel; J P Richie; J B deKernion; P C Walsh; P T Scardino; P H Lange; E N Subong; R E Parson; G H Gasior; K G Loveland; P C Southwick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010.

Authors:  Andrew M D Wolf; Richard C Wender; Ruth B Etzioni; Ian M Thompson; Anthony V D'Amico; Robert J Volk; Durado D Brooks; Chiranjeev Dash; Idris Guessous; Kimberly Andrews; Carol DeSantis; Robert A Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Effect of digital rectal examination and needle biopsy on serum total and percentage of free prostate specific antigen levels.

Authors:  D K Ornstein; G S Rao; D S Smith; T L Ratliff; J W Basler; W J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  DD3: a new prostate-specific gene, highly overexpressed in prostate cancer.

Authors:  M J Bussemakers; A van Bokhoven; G W Verhaegh; F P Smit; H F Karthaus; J A Schalken; F M Debruyne; N Ru; W B Isaacs
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Rational approach to implementation of prostate cancer antigen 3 into clinical care.

Authors:  Rou Wang; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Rodney L Dunn; Kirk J Wojno; John T Wei
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  The natural history of men treated with deferred androgen deprivation therapy in whom metastatic prostate cancer developed following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Michael A Carducci; Alan W Partin; Mario A Eisenberger; Patrick C Walsh; Bruce J Trock
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Characterization of ERG, AR and PTEN gene status in circulating tumor cells from patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gerhardt Attard; Joost F Swennenhuis; David Olmos; Alison H M Reid; Elaine Vickers; Roger A'Hern; Rianne Levink; Frank Coumans; Joana Moreira; Ruth Riisnaes; Nikhil Babu Oommen; George Hawche; Charles Jameson; Emilda Thompson; Ronald Sipkema; Craig P Carden; Christopher Parker; David Dearnaley; Stan B Kaye; Colin S Cooper; Arturo Molina; Michael E Cox; Leon W M M Terstappen; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  Predictive biomarkers: a paradigm shift towards personalized cancer medicine.

Authors:  Nicholas B La Thangue; David J Kerr
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Circulating tumor cells predict survival benefit from treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Johann S de Bono; Howard I Scher; R Bruce Montgomery; Christopher Parker; M Craig Miller; Henk Tissing; Gerald V Doyle; Leon W W M Terstappen; Kenneth J Pienta; Derek Raghavan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  168 in total

1.  A molecular signature predictive of indolent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shazia Irshad; Mukesh Bansal; Mireia Castillo-Martin; Tian Zheng; Alvaro Aytes; Sven Wenske; Clémentine Le Magnen; Paolo Guarnieri; Pavel Sumazin; Mitchell C Benson; Michael M Shen; Andrea Califano; Cory Abate-Shen
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Omicseq: a web-based search engine for exploring omics datasets.

Authors:  Xiaobo Sun; William S Pittard; Tianlei Xu; Li Chen; Michael E Zwick; Xiaoqian Jiang; Fusheng Wang; Zhaohui S Qin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Copy number alteration burden predicts prostate cancer relapse.

Authors:  Haley Hieronymus; Nikolaus Schultz; Anuradha Gopalan; Brett S Carver; Matthew T Chang; Yonghong Xiao; Adriana Heguy; Kety Huberman; Melanie Bernstein; Melissa Assel; Rajmohan Murali; Andrew Vickers; Peter T Scardino; Chris Sander; Victor Reuter; Barry S Taylor; Charles L Sawyers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Identification of candidate genes that may contribute to the metastasis of prostate cancer by bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Lingyun Liu; Kaimin Guo; Zuowen Liang; Fubiao Li; Hongliang Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Accessible Telemedicine Diagnostics with ELISA in a 3D Printed Pipette Tip.

Authors:  Mohamed Sharafeldin; Karteek Kadimisetty; Ketki R Bhalerao; Itti Bist; Abby Jones; Tianqi Chen; Norman H Lee; James F Rusling
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Potential use of chymotrypsin-like proteasomal activity as a biomarker for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Xinghua Wei; Weiwei Zeng; Keji Xie; Pengfei Diao; Ping Tang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 7.  Rationale for the development of alternative forms of androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Sangeeta Kumari; Dhirodatta Senapati; Hannelore V Heemers
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 8.  Advancing precision medicine for prostate cancer through genomics.

Authors:  Sameek Roychowdhury; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Validation and clinical utility of prostate cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Howard I Scher; Michael J Morris; Steven Larson; Glenn Heller
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Steering Committee: PI-RADS v2 Status Update and Future Directions.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Jeffrey Weinreb; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Geert Villeirs; Baris Turkbey; Jelle Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.