OBJECTIVE: To determine if pregnancy complications are increased in super-obese (a body mass index (BMI) of 50 or more) compared to other, less obese parturients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND POPULATION: All 19,700 eligible women, including 425 (2.2%) super-obese women with singleton births between 1996 and 2007 delivering at a tertiary referral center, identified using a perinatal research database. METHODS: Bivariate and trend analyses were used to assess the relation between super-obesity and various pregnancy complications compared to other well-established BMI categories. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using multivariable logistic regression techniques. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes for adjusted and unadjusted analyses were small-for-gestational age (SGA) birth, large-for-gestational age (LGA) birth, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), fetal death, preterm birth, placental abruption, cesarean delivery, and Apgar scores < 7. RESULTS: Compared to all other obese and non-obese women, super-obese women had the highest rates of preeclampsia, GDM, LGA, and cesarean delivery (all p < 0.05 for trend test). Super-obesity was also associated with a 44% reduction in SGA compared to all other women (OR 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.76) and a 25% reduction compared to other, less obese women (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.54-1.03). Super-obesity was positively associated with LGA, GDM, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, and a 5-minute Apgar score < 7 compared to all other women after controlling for important confounders. CONCLUSION: Super-obesity is associated with higher rates of pregnancy complications compared to women of all other BMI classes, including other obese women.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if pregnancy complications are increased in super-obese (a body mass index (BMI) of 50 or more) compared to other, less obese parturients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND POPULATION: All 19,700 eligible women, including 425 (2.2%) super-obesewomen with singleton births between 1996 and 2007 delivering at a tertiary referral center, identified using a perinatal research database. METHODS: Bivariate and trend analyses were used to assess the relation between super-obesity and various pregnancy complications compared to other well-established BMI categories. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using multivariable logistic regression techniques. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes for adjusted and unadjusted analyses were small-for-gestational age (SGA) birth, large-for-gestational age (LGA) birth, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), fetal death, preterm birth, placental abruption, cesarean delivery, and Apgar scores < 7. RESULTS: Compared to all other obese and non-obesewomen, super-obesewomen had the highest rates of preeclampsia, GDM, LGA, and cesarean delivery (all p < 0.05 for trend test). Super-obesity was also associated with a 44% reduction in SGA compared to all other women (OR 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.76) and a 25% reduction compared to other, less obesewomen (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.54-1.03). Super-obesity was positively associated with LGA, GDM, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, and a 5-minute Apgar score < 7 compared to all other women after controlling for important confounders. CONCLUSION:Super-obesity is associated with higher rates of pregnancy complications compared to women of all other BMI classes, including other obesewomen.
Authors: Mona T Lydon-Rochelle; Victoria L Holt; Vicky Cárdenas; Jennifer C Nelson; Thomas R Easterling; Carolyn Gardella; William M Callaghan Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: E E Mason; C Doherty; J W Maher; D H Scott; E M Rodriguez; T J Blommers Journal: Gastroenterol Clin North Am Date: 1987-09 Impact factor: 3.806
Authors: Mark Christopher Alanis; William H Goodnight; Elizabeth G Hill; Christopher J Robinson; Margaret S Villers; Donna D Johnson Journal: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Nicole E Marshall; Camelia Guild; Yvonne W Cheng; Aaron B Caughey; Donna R Halloran Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Rebecca G Clifton; Mary Evans; Alison G Cahill; Paul W Franks; Dympna Gallagher; Suzanne Phelan; Jeremy Pomeroy; Leanne M Redman; Linda Van Horn Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2015-12-26 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Stephen J McCall; Zhuoyang Li; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Elizabeth Sullivan; Marian Knight Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Keisuke Murakami; Harish Bhandari; Emma S Lucas; Satoru Takeda; Caroline E Gargett; Siobhan Quenby; Jan J Brosens; Bee K Tan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Elizabeth A Sullivan; Jan E Dickinson; Geraldine A Vaughan; Michael J Peek; David Ellwood; Caroline S E Homer; Marian Knight; Claire McLintock; Alex Wang; Wendy Pollock; Lisa Jackson Pulver; Zhuoyang Li; Nasrin Javid; Elizabeth Denney-Wilson; Leonie Callaway Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 3.007