| Literature DB >> 20437233 |
Andrea Legat1, Claudia Gruber, Klaus Zangger, Gerhard Wanner, Helga Stan-Lotter.
Abstract
Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) are accumulated in many prokaryotes. Several members of the Halobacteriaceae produce poly-3-hydroxybutyrate (PHB), but it is not known if this is a general property of the family. We evaluated identification methods for PHAs with 20 haloarchaeal species, three of them isolates from Permian salt. Staining with Sudan Black B, Nile Blue A, or Nile Red was applied to screen for the presence of PHAs. Transmission electron microscopy and (1)H-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy were used for visualization of PHB granules and chemical confirmation of PHAs in cell extracts, respectively. We report for the first time the production of PHAs by Halococcus sp. (Halococcus morrhuae DSM 1307(T), Halococcus saccharolyticus DSM 5350(T), Halococcus salifodinae DSM 8989(T), Halococcus dombrowskii DSM 14522(T), Halococcus hamelinensis JCM 12892(T), Halococcus qingdaonensis JCM 13587(T)), Halorubrum sp. (Hrr. coriense DSM 10284(T), Halorubrum chaoviator DSM 19316(T), Hrr. chaoviator strains NaxosII and AUS-1), haloalkaliphiles (Natronobacterium gregoryi NCMB 2189(T), Natronococcus occultus DSM 3396(T)) and Halobacterium noricense DSM 9758(T). No PHB was detected in Halobacterium salinarum NRC-1 ATCC 700922, Hbt. salinarum R1 and Haloferax volcanii DSM 3757(T). Most species synthesized PHAs when growing in synthetic as well as in complex medium. The polyesters were generally composed of PHB and poly-ss-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate (PHBV). Available genomic data suggest the absence of PHA synthesis in some haloarchaea and in all other Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota. Homologies between haloarchaeal and bacterial PHA synthesizing enzymes had indicated to some authors probable horizontal gene transfer, which, considering the data obtained in this study, may have occurred already before Permian times.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20437233 PMCID: PMC2895300 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-010-2611-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ISSN: 0175-7598 Impact factor: 4.813
Fig. 1Fluorescence microscopy of Halococcus species following staining with Nile Blue A. Growth media are indicated in brackets. First row: a Hcc. salifodinae DSM 8989T (M2 medium); b Hcc. hamelinensis JCM 12892T (DSM medium 372); c Hcc. dombrowskii DSM 14522T (M2 medium). Second row: d Hcc. qingdaonensis JCM 13587T (DSM medium 372); e Hcc. saccharolyticus DSM 5350T (M2 medium); f Hcc. morrhuae DSM 1307T (M2 medium). Bar 5 μm
PHB accumulation in haloarchaeal species detected by staining with Nile Blue A or Sudan Black B. Cells were grown in synthetic medium + 1% glucose and/or complex medium (type indicated in brackets; see “Material and methods” sections for composition). The presence of stainable granules is indicated by+ (Nile Blue A; Sudan Black B), or no staining (−)
| Organism | Synthetic medium + 1% glucose | Complex medium | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nile Blue A | Sudan Black B | Nile Blue A | Sudan Black B | |
|
| + | + | + | ND |
| (M2) | ||||
|
| + | + | + | ND |
| (M2) | ||||
|
| + | + | + | + |
| (M2) | (M2) | |||
|
| + | + | + | ND |
| (M2) | ||||
|
| ND | ND | + | ND |
| (DSM372) | ||||
|
| ND | ND | + | ND |
| (DSM372) | ||||
|
| + | + | ND | ND |
|
| + | + | + | ND |
| (M2) | ||||
|
| + | + | + | ND |
| (M2) | ||||
|
| ND | ND | + | + |
| (JCM 457) | (JCM457) | |||
|
| + | + | + | ND |
| (DSM823 mod.) | ||||
|
| + | + | + | ND |
| (M2) | ||||
|
| + | + | + | ND |
| (M2) | ||||
|
| + | + | + | ND |
| (M2) | ||||
|
| ND | ND | + | ND |
| (M2) | ||||
| Negative control: | ND | ND | – | – |
| (nutrient broth) | (nutrient broth) | |||
ND not done
Fig. 2Transmission electron micrograph of Hcc. morrhuae DSM 1307T grown in complex medium (M2) for 7 days. Cells contain whitish poly-β-hydroxybutyrate inclusion bodies
Contents of PHB and PHBV in haloarchaeal species, determined by proton NMR from cell extracts
| Origin of material | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organism | Freeze-dried cells | Fresh cells, aqueous extract | Fresh cells, hypochlorite extract | |||
| PHB | PHBV | PHB | PHBV | PHB | PHBV | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.19 | 0.03 | 69.6 ± 0.43a | 8.1 ± 0.3a | ND | ND |
| 0.20 | 0.05 | |||||
|
| ND | ND | Not detectable | Not detectable | ND | ND |
|
| 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.4 ± 0a | 0.07 ± 0.05a | 0.1 | Not detectable |
|
| 0.05 | 0.01 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
|
| ND | ND | 1.2 | Not detectable | 0.05 | Not detectable |
|
| 0.09 | 0.04 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
|
| Not detectable | Not detectable | ND | ND | ND | ND |
|
| ND | ND | Not detectable | Not detectable | Not detectable | Not detectable |
|
| 0.08 | 0.03 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
|
| ND | ND | 0.1 | Not detectable | ND | ND |
|
| 0.1 | 0.03 | 0.1 | Not detectable | 0.4 | Not detectable |
| 0.44 | 0.18 | |||||
|
| ND | ND | ND | ND | 3.1 | Not detectable |
Freeze-dried cells were treated with CDCl3 and sonicated prior to 1H NMR analysis (see Methods); cell dry weights ranged from 33 to 170 mg. Water and hypochlorite extracts were prepared from fresh cells (see Methods for details) and ranged from 2 to 10 mg
ND not done
aMean value ± standard deviation from three experiments each