Literature DB >> 20434830

The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.

Matthew H Hayn1, Abid Hussain, Ahmed M Mansour, Paul E Andrews, Paul Carpentier, Erik Castle, Prokar Dasgupta, Peter Rimington, Raju Thomas, Shamim Khan, Adam Kibel, Hyung Kim, Murugesan Manoharan, Mani Menon, Alex Mottrie, David Ornstein, James Peabody, Raj Pruthi, Joan Palou Redorta, Lee Richstone, Francis Schanne, Hans Stricker, Peter Wiklund, Rameela Chandrasekhar, Greg E Wilding, Khurshid A Guru.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has evolved as a minimally invasive alternative to open radical cystectomy for patients with invasive bladder cancer.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to define the learning curve for RARC by evaluating results from a multicenter, contemporary, consecutive series of patients who underwent this procedure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Utilizing the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium database, a prospectively maintained and institutional review board-approved database, we identified 496 patients who underwent RARC by 21 surgeons at 14 institutions from 2003 to 2009. MEASUREMENTS: Cut-off points for operative time, lymph node yield (LNY), estimated blood loss (EBL), and margin positivity were identified. Using specifically designed statistical mixed models, we were able to inversely predict the number of patients required for an institution to reach the predetermined cut-off points. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Mean operative time was 386 min, mean EBL was 408 ml, and mean LNY was 18. Overall, 34 of 482 patients (7%) had a positive surgical margin (PSM). Using statistical models, it was estimated that 21 patients were required for operative time to reach 6.5h and 8, 20, and 30 patients were required to reach an LNY of 12, 16, and 20, respectively. For all patients, PSM rates of <5% were achieved after 30 patients. For patients with pathologic stage higher than T2, PSM rates of <15% were achieved after 24 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: RARC is a challenging procedure but is a technique that is reproducible throughout multiple centers. This report helps to define the learning curve for RARC and demonstrates an acceptable level of proficiency by the 30th case for proxy measures of RARC quality. Copyright (c) 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20434830     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  60 in total

1.  [Radical cystectomy - pro robotic].

Authors:  J Kamradt; M Saar; C Ohlmann; S Siemer; M Stöckle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Surgery. Outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: learning curves, margins and lymph node yield.

Authors:  Nick Groves-Kirkby
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Current status and outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and urinary diversion.

Authors:  Kyle A Richards; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  The Role of Robotics in the Invasive Management of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Pramit Khetrapal; Wei Shen Tan; Benjamin Lamb; Melanie Tan; Hilary Baker; James Thompson; Ashwin Sridhar; John D Kelly; Tim Briggs
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Status of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy (RARC) in 2012.

Authors:  Amrith R Rao; Andrew P Stegemann; Shabnam Rehman; Michael A Poch; Dawn Green; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-02-16

Review 6.  Practical tips for safe and efficient robotic cystectomy.

Authors:  Gregory M Janda; Michael E Woods; Raj S Pruthi
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  Simulation-based training in robot-assisted surgery: current evidence of value and potential trends for the future.

Authors:  Michael I Hanzly; Tareq Al-Tartir; Syed Johar Raza; Atif Khan; Mohammad Manan Durrani; Thomas Fiorica; Phillip Ginsberg; James L Mohler; Boris Kuvshinoff; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  What is next in robotic urology?

Authors:  Xavier Cathelineau; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Arjun Sivaraman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Updates on Robotic Intracorporeal Urinary Diversions.

Authors:  Shawn Dason; Alvin C Goh
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Long-term evaluation of oncologic and functional outcomes after laparoscopic open-assisted radical cystectomy: a matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Simone Albisinni; Ksenija Limani; Lisa Ingels; Felix Kwizera; Renaud Bollens; Eric Hawaux; Thierry Quackels; Marc Vanden Bossche; Alexandre Peltier; Thierry Roumeguère; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.