Literature DB >> 24469859

Long-term evaluation of oncologic and functional outcomes after laparoscopic open-assisted radical cystectomy: a matched-pair analysis.

Simone Albisinni1, Ksenija Limani, Lisa Ingels, Felix Kwizera, Renaud Bollens, Eric Hawaux, Thierry Quackels, Marc Vanden Bossche, Alexandre Peltier, Thierry Roumeguère, Roland van Velthoven.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate peri- and postoperative morbidity, and long-term oncologic and functional results of our laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) technique, comparing it with our standard open approach.
METHODS: Between 2000 and 2010, 54 patients underwent LRC for urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder in two academic hospitals. The procedures were performed by two surgeons. Patients were matched 1:1 with patients who underwent open RC in the same years by the same surgical team. Differences in peri- and postoperative complications across the two groups were assessed using Wilcoxon's rank-sum or χ (2) test. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests and Cox regression models were constructed to assess differences in recurrence-free survival on long-term follow-up between the two groups.
RESULTS: Laparoscopic radical cystectomy was significantly associated with lower blood loss (p < 0.0001) and less frequent postoperative ileus (p = 0.03). Regarding more serious postoperative complications, no difference was found across the two cohorts. Median oncologic follow-up was 42 months (IQR 12-72 months) in the LRC cohort and 18 months (IQR 8-27 months) in patients undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC). No statistically significant difference in recurrence-free survival was observed between the two groups (log rank p = 0.677). On univariate Cox regression, the surgical approach used was not significantly associated with risk of recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that LRC is safe and associated with lower blood loss and decreased postoperative ileus compared with ORC. Moreover, on long-term oncologic follow-up, LRC appeared non-inferior to ORC with no significant difference in recurrence-free survival. Nonetheless, these results must be confirmed by larger series and stronger long-term follow-up data are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24469859     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1245-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  27 in total

1.  Perioperative outcomes and oncologic efficacy from a pilot prospective randomized clinical trial of open versus robotic assisted radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Dipen J Parekh; Jamie Messer; John Fitzgerald; Barbara Ercole; Robert Svatek
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  The oncologic results of laparoscopic radical cystectomy are not (yet) equivalent to open cystectomy.

Authors:  Richard E Hautmann
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 3.  The role of laparoscopic and robotic cystectomy in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with special emphasis on cancer control and complications.

Authors:  Ben J Challacombe; Bernard H Bochner; Prokar Dasgupta; Inderbir Gill; Khurshid Guru; Harry Herr; Alexander Mottrie; Raj Pruthi; Joan Palou Redorta; Peter Wiklund
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Functional outcomes and complications in patients with bladder cancer undergoing robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with extracorporeal Indiana pouch continent cutaneous urinary diversion.

Authors:  Robert R Torrey; Kevin G Chan; Wesley Yip; David Y Josephson; Clayton S Lau; Nora H Ruel; Timothy G Wilson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.

Authors:  Matthew H Hayn; Abid Hussain; Ahmed M Mansour; Paul E Andrews; Paul Carpentier; Erik Castle; Prokar Dasgupta; Peter Rimington; Raju Thomas; Shamim Khan; Adam Kibel; Hyung Kim; Murugesan Manoharan; Mani Menon; Alex Mottrie; David Ornstein; James Peabody; Raj Pruthi; Joan Palou Redorta; Lee Richstone; Francis Schanne; Hans Stricker; Peter Wiklund; Rameela Chandrasekhar; Greg E Wilding; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Laparoscopic assisted radical cystectomy: the montsouris experience after 84 cases.

Authors:  Xavier Cathelineau; Carlos Arroyo; François Rozet; Eric Barret; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-04-11       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  ICUD-EAU International Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2012: Urinary diversion.

Authors:  Richard E Hautmann; Hassan Abol-Enein; Thomas Davidsson; Sigurdur Gudjonsson; Stefan H Hautmann; Henriette V Holm; Cheryl T Lee; Frederik Liedberg; Stephan Madersbacher; Murugesan Manoharan; Wiking Mansson; Robert D Mills; David F Penson; Eila C Skinner; Raimund Stein; Urs E Studer; Joachim W Thueroff; William H Turner; Bjoern G Volkmer; Abai Xu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 8.  Treatment of muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: update of the EAU guidelines.

Authors:  Arnulf Stenzl; Nigel C Cowan; Maria De Santis; Markus A Kuczyk; Axel S Merseburger; Maria José Ribal; Amir Sherif; J Alfred Witjes
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Standardization of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: a collaborative group report.

Authors:  Harry Herr; Cheryl Lee; Sam Chang; Seth Lerner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Open versus laparoscopy-assisted radical cystectomy: results of a prospective study.

Authors:  Francesco Porpiglia; Julien Renard; Michele Billia; Cesare Scoffone; Cecilia Cracco; Carlo Terrone; Roberto Mario Scarpa
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  4 in total

1.  The morbidity of laparoscopic radical cystectomy: analysis of postoperative complications in a multicenter cohort by the European Association of Urology (EAU)-Section of Uro-Technology.

Authors:  Simone Albisinni; Marco Oderda; Laurent Fossion; Virginia Varca; Jens Rassweiler; Xavier Cathelineau; Piotr Chlosta; Alexandre De la Taille; Franco Gaboardi; Thierry Piechaud; Peter Rimington; Laurent Salomon; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Dogu Teber; Roland Van Velthoven
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  What is the best urinary diversion after laparoscopic radical cystectomy?

Authors:  Barbaros Baseskioğlu; Iyimser Ure
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014

3.  Comparison beetwen open and laparoscopic radical cistectomy in a Latin American reference center: perioperative and oncological results.

Authors:  Marcos Tobias-Machado; Danniel Frade Said; Anuar Ibrahim Mitre; Alexandre Pompeo; Antonio Carlos Lima Pompeo
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

4.  Does previous abdominal surgery adversely affect perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic radical cystectomy?

Authors:  Xiaosong Wei; Jinjin Lu; Khurram Mutahir Siddiqui; Fan Li; Qianyuan Zhuang; Weimin Yang; Zhiquan Hu; Zhong Chen; Xiaodong Song; Shaogang Wang; Zhangqun Ye
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.754

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.