Literature DB >> 16509323

Determination of NAPL-water interfacial areas in well-characterized porous media.

Richard Dobson1, Martin H Schroth, Mart Oostrom, Josef Zeyer.   

Abstract

The nonaqueous-phase liquid (NAPL)-water interfacial area is an important parameter which influences the rate of NAPL dissolution in porous media. The aim of this study was to generate a set of baseline data for specific interfacial area for a two-phase-entrapped NAPL-water system in well-characterized porous media and subsequently use these data to evaluate two current theoretical models. The first model tested distributes entrapped NAPL over the pore classes based on Land's algorithm and assumes the resulting blobs to be spherical. The other model is thermodynamically based, assuming that reversible work done on the system results in an increase in interfacial area, such that the area between drainage and imbibition retention curves can be related to the interfacial area. Interfacial tracer tests (IFTT) were used to measure specific entrapped NAPL (hexadecane)-water interfacial areas in columns packed with four grades (12/20, 20/30, 30/40, 40/50) of silica sand. By use of the anionic surfactant dihexylsulfosuccinate (Aerosol MA80), IFTT gave specific interfacial areas between 58 cm(-1) for the finest sand and 16 cm(-1) for the coarsest, compared to values of between 33 and 7 cm(-1) for the first model and between 19 and 5 cm(-1) for the thermodynamic model. Results from the literature suggest that nonspherical blobs shapes occur relatively frequently; hence it is reasonable to suggest that the assumption of spherical NAPL blobs may explain the underprediction by the first model. The thermodynamic model underestimates the interfacial area because it assumes that entrapment occurs only within the largest pores. A modified version of the latter model, allowing entrapment across all pore classes, yielded values between 58 and 13 cm(-1). Of the models tested the modified thermodynamic model best predicts the interfacial area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16509323     DOI: 10.1021/es050037p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  19 in total

1.  The two-phase flow IPTT method for measurement of nonwetting-wetting liquid interfacial areas at higher nonwetting saturations in natural porous media.

Authors:  Hua Zhong; Asma El Ouni; Dan Lin; Bingguo Wang; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2016-07-24       Impact factor: 5.240

2.  Low-concentration tracer tests to measure air-water interfacial area in porous media.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Ying Lyu; Ni Yan; Bo Guo
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Impact of organic-liquid distribution and flow-field heterogeneity on reductions in mass flux.

Authors:  Erica L DiFilippo; Kenneth C Carroll; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.188

4.  Adsorption of PFOA at the Air-Water Interface during Transport in Unsaturated Porous Media.

Authors:  Ying Lyu; Mark L Brusseau; Wei Chen; Ni Yan; Xiaori Fu; Xueyu Lin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Assessing the potential contributions of additional retention processes to PFAS retardation in the subsurface.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  COMPARISON OF INTERFACIAL PARTITIONING TRACER TEST AND HIGH-RESOLUTION MICROTOMOGRAPHY MEASUREMENTS OF FLUID-FLUID INTERFACIAL AREAS FOR AN IDEAL POROUS MEDIUM.

Authors:  Matt Narter; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.240

7.  NAPL-water interfacial area as a function of fluid saturation measured with the interfacial partitioning tracer test method.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; H Taghap
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  Assessing XMT-Measurement Variability of Air-Water Interfacial Areas in Natural Porous Media.

Authors:  Juliana B Araujo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2019-11-17       Impact factor: 5.240

9.  Assessment of a simple function to evaluate the relationship between mass flux reduction and mass removal for organic-liquid contaminated source zones.

Authors:  Erica L DiFilippo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.188

10.  SYNCHROTRON X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY AND INTERFACIAL PARTITIONING TRACER TEST MEASUREMENTS OF NAPL-WATER INTERFACIAL AREAS.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Hilary Janousek; Asami Murao; Gregory Schnaar
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.