| Literature DB >> 20433752 |
Pei-Chun Liao1, Dai-Chang Kuo, Chia-Chia Lin, Kuo-Chieh Ho, Tsan-Piao Lin, Shih-Ying Hwang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Species in the varied geographic topology of Taiwan underwent obvious demographic changes during glacial periods. Cinnamomum kanehirae has been exploited for timber and to obtain medicinal fungi for the past 100 years. Understanding anthropogenic factors influencing the demography of this species after the last glacial maximum (LGM) is critically important for the conservation of this species.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20433752 PMCID: PMC2880300 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Geographical distribution and magnitudes of migration routes of . In the upper panel, the flow of the Kuroshio Current is shown. In the bottom left panel, four geographic regions defined by Lin et al. [35] together with the location of populations are indicated. The northwestern region (NW) contains populations TP, KW, TH, and NC; the west-central region (WC) contains populations WC, CT, WH, and ALS; the southwestern region (SW) contains populations KS, HNS, FKS, and TN; and the southeastern region (SE) contains populations FL, HKL, CL, YL, CP, YF, and TML. Abbreviations of population codes are listed in Table 1. The dark area indicates elevations above 2000 m, and the gray area indicates the distribution range of C. kanehirae outside the area above 2000 m [26,35]. HR, Huseshan Range; CMR, Central Mountain Ridge. In the bottom right panel, directions and magnitudes of gene flow estimated by the Bayesian approach are shown. Arrows indicate the direction of migration and the thickness of the arrows indicates values of the migration parameter (M) calculated by the computer software, MIGRATE 3.0 [54].
Sampling sites, population codes, region to which a population belongs, longitude and latitude of populations, and haplotypes in each population of Cinnamomum kanehirae in Taiwan.
| Population | Code | Geographic regions | Elevation (m) | Longitude | Latitude | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kuanwu | KW | Northwestern (NW) | 1500 | 121°07'12"E | 24°30'36"N | 4(3), 5(2), 22(1) | 1(2), 11(1), 14(1), 26(2) |
| Nanchuang | NC | Northwestern (NW) | 1100 | 121°03'00"E | 24°24'36"N | 3(1), 4(3), 13(1), 14 (12), 15(2), 24(1) | 1(10), 11(1), 14(1) |
| Tahu | TH | Northwestern (NW) | 1400 | 120°52'12"E | 24°25'12"N | 4(1), 15(1), 22(3), | 1(4), 11(2), 14(2) |
| Taping | TP | Northwestern (NW) | 1300 | 121°03'36"E | 24°40'48"N | 2-3(1), 4(3), 15(2), | 1(2), 3(2), 26(2), |
| Alishan | ALS | West-central (WC) | 2000 | 120°47'24"E | 23°30'36"N | 1-2(2), 3(1), 4(3), 5(1), | 1(2), 2(2) |
| Chitou | CT | West-central (WC) | 1500 | 120°47'24"E | 23°39'36"N | 1(3), 3(1), 4(7), 5(2), 9(1), | 11(1), 12(2) |
| Wuchieh | WC | West-central (WC) | 600 | 120°54'36"E | 23°51'36"N | 3(2), 4(2), 30(1) | 12(1), 17(1), |
| Wanghsiang | WH | West-central (WC) | 1100 | 120°55'48"E | 23°37'12"N | 3(2), 15(1), 16(1), | 25(1), 26(5) |
| Fengkangshan | FKS | Southwestern (SW) | 2100 | 120°47'24"E | 23°00'00"N | 1(11), 2(1), 4(4), 9(1), 22(1), 23(2), 24(1), | 1(14), 11(2), |
| Hsinanshan | HNS | Southwestern (SW) | 1000 | 120°46'48"E | 23°03'36"N | 4(1), 5(1), 15(1), | 11(4), 22(4) |
| Kuanshan | KS | Southwestern (SW) | 1000 | 120°54'36"E | 23°24'36"N | 3(4), 4(8), 8(2), 9(5), | 1(1), 2(1), 12(2), 17(4), 22(1), |
| Tona | TN | Southwestern (SW) | 1500 | 120°43'12"E | 22°54'36"N | 4(1), 15(3), 20(1), | 22(2), |
| Chulu | CL | Southeastern (SE) | 200 | 121°18'00"E | 23°21'00"N | 3(3), 4(2), 7(1) | 3(2), 4(1), 5(3) |
| Chingping | CP | Southeastern (SE) | 1200 | 121°10'12"E | 23°40'48"N | 3(1), 4(12), 8(1), 9(1), 11(1) | 3(3), 4(1), 5(4), |
| Fuli | FL | Southeastern (SE) | 600 | 121°11'24"E | 23°10'48"N | 3(2), 4(2), 11(1), 15(1) | 1(2), 3(1), |
| Hsiukuluan | HKL | Southeastern (SE) | 700 | 121°13'12"E | 23°15'00"N | 3(7), 4(6), 8(1), 9(1), | 3(8), 12(5), 17(1), |
| Taimali | TML | Southeastern (SE) | 600 | 121°00'00"E | 22°30'36"N | 3(3), 4(4), 9(2), | 19(2), |
| Yungfeng | YF | Southeastern (SE) | 600 | 121°10'12"E | 23°04'12"N | 3(4), 4(4), 14(1), | 1(8) |
| Yuli | YL | Southeastern (SE) | 1000 | 121°15'00"E | 23°11'24"N | 3(2), 4(4), 9(2) | 3(1), 11(2), 12(7) |
The numbers in parentheses indicates the frequency of a haplotype at a particular site. Haplotypes which are population-specific are also region-specific, and they are underlined.
Genetic diversity of 19 populations of Cinnamomum kanehirae estimated using Chs and Lfy sequences.
| Tajima's | Fu's | Raggedness index | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | ||||||||
| KW | 6 | 3 | 0.733 ± 0.155 | 6.91 ± 1.88 | 6.19 ± 3.42 | -0.027(0.757) | 0.094(0.944) | 0.5067 |
| NC | 10 | 8 | 0.889 ± 0.075 | 7.50 ± 1.33 | 6.66 ± 3.20 | -0.018(0.788) | -0.731(0.725) | 0.0844 |
| TH | 6 | 4 | 0.800 ± 0.172 | 6.49 ± 2.84 | 7.56 ± 4.07 | -0.112(0.274) | 0.450(0.633) | 0.6267 |
| TP | 10 | 5 | 0.844 ± 0.080 | 7.33 ± 0.93 | 5.55 ± 2.75 | -0.022(0.974) | -0.665(0.886) | 0.1368 |
| ALS | 10 | 6 | 0.844 ± 0.080 | 8.65 ± 1.08 | 6.66 ± 3.20 | -0.296(0.976) | -0.551(0.937) | 0.0756 |
| CT | 30 | 17 | 0.917 ± 0.030 | 7.20 ± 0.40 | 4.76 ± 1.95 | -0.033(0.994) | -2.684(0.406) | 0.0256 |
| WC | 5 | 4 | 0.800 ± 0.164 | 5.65 ± 1.45 | 4.52 ± 2.76 | -0.041(0.987) | 0.061(0.869) | 0.2800 |
| WH | 5 | 4 | 0.900 ± 0.161 | 7.85 ± 2.20 | 8.29 ± 4.66 | 0.011(0.314) | -0.369(0.760) | 0.3100 |
| FKS | 22 | 8 | 0.732 ± 0.090 | 8.09 ± 0.98 | 5.60 ± 2.35 | -0.089 (0.969) | -0.486(0.803) | 0.1135 |
| HNS | 5 | 6 | 1.000 ± 0.126 | 7.22 ± 2.51 | 8.29 ± 4.66 | -0.043(0.149) | 0.166(0.104) | 0.1600 |
| KS | 21 | 7 | 0.786 ± 0.058 | 4.96 ± 0.33 | 3.05 ± 1.49 | -0.053(0.993) | -1.000(0.903) | 0.0986 |
| TN | 7 | 5 | 0.524 ± 0.209 | 3.89 ± 2.33 | 5.13 ± 2.80 | -0.066(0.119) | 0.357(0.843) | 0.1950 |
| CL | 6 | 5 | 0.733 ± 0.155 | 5.23 ± 1.27 | 4.13 ± 2.44 | 0.022(0.970) | -0.082(0.933) | 0.5067 |
| CP | 17 | 7 | 0.515 ± 0.145 | 3.72 ± 1.09 | 3.71 ± 1.79 | -0.035(0.541) | 0.105(0.509) | 0.3279 |
| FL | 6 | 4 | 0.867 ± 0.129 | 7.64 ± 1.53 | 6.88 ± 3.75 | 0.010(0.833) | -0.451(0.878) | 0.2756 |
| HKL | 16 | 5 | 0.650 ± 0.075 | 5.14 ± 0.46 | 3.31 ± 1.66 | -0.062(0.989) | -0.281(0.961) | 0.3197* |
| TML | 10 | 4 | 0.778 ± 0.091 | 5.65 ± 0.85 | 4.44 ± 2.29 | -0.041(0.923) | -0.335(0.931) | 0.1590 |
| YF | 10 | 4 | 0.733 ± 0.101 | 5.44 ± 0.64 | 3.88 ± 2.06 | -0.011(0.984) | -0.553(0.940) | 0.2696 |
| YL | 8 | 3 | 0.714 ± 0.123 | 5.16 ± 0.82 | 3.63 ± 2.05 | -0.023(0.995) | -0.115(0.958) | 0.2041 |
| Region | ||||||||
| NW | 32 | 10 | 0.853 ± 0.039 | 7.35 ± 0.57 | 5.46 ± 2.15 | -0.022(0.919) | -1.308(0.771) | 0.0332 |
| WC | 50 | 20 | 0.906 ± 0.024 | 7.55 ± 0.31 | 4.56 ± 1.74 | -0.048(0.994) | -3.671(0.583) | 0.0114 |
| SW | 55 | 20 | 0.876 ± 0.026 | 7.84 ± 0.29 | 4.46 ± 1.69 | -0.014(0.999) | -3.388(0.643) | 0.0251 |
| SE | 73 | 14 | 0.679 ± 0.041 | 5.11 ± 0.21 | 3.23 ± 1.28 | -0.034(0.953) | -1.019(0.676) | 0.2150 |
| Total | 210 | 41 | 0.841 ± 0.019 | 7.16 ± 0.19 | 3.71 ± 1.25 | -0.064(0.999) | -4.405(0.255) | 0.0186 |
| Population | ||||||||
| KW | 6 | 4 | 0.867 ± 0.129 | 1.89 ± 0.47 | 1.78 ± 1.23 | -0.022(0.682) | -0.282(0.197) | 0.1867 |
| NC | 12 | 3 | 0.318 ± 0.164 | 1.04 ± 0.54 | 1.34 ± 0.88 | -0.051(0.262) | 0.269(0.480) | 0.4860 |
| TH | 8 | 3 | 0.714 ± 0.123 | 2.12 ± 0.37 | 1.56 ± 1.06 | 0.027(0.971) | -0.800(0.949) | 0.1225 |
| TP | 7 | 4 | 0.857 ± 0.102 | 6.56 ± 1.61 | 6.62 ± 3.41 | -0.063(0.519) | -0.356(0.915) | 0.1474 |
| ALS | 4 | 2 | 0.667 ± 0.204 | 0.90 ± 0.28 | 0.74 ± 0.74 | -0.002(0.883) | 0.065(0.852) | 0.5556 |
| CT | 3 | 2 | 0.667 ± 0.314 | 0.90 ± 0.42 | 0.90 ± 0.90 | - | - | 0.5556 |
| WC | 4 | 4 | 1.000 ± 0.177 | 3.15 ± 0.82 | 2.95 ± 2.01 | -0.044(0.806) | 0.059(0.067) | 0.2222 |
| WH | 6 | 2 | 0.333 ± 0.215 | 0.45 ± 0.29 | 0.59 ± 0.59 | -0.003(0.240) | 0.154(0.568) | 0.2222 |
| FKS | 19 | 4 | 0.456 ± 0.132 | 1.50 ± 0.46 | 1.93 ± 1.04 | -0.035(0.277) | 0.150(0.550) | 0.3502 |
| HNS | 8 | 2 | 0.571 ± 0.094 | 2.32 ± 0.38 | 1.56 ± 1.06 | -0.007(0.994) | -0.171(0.985) | 0.8367* |
| KS | 20 | 11 | 0.916 ± 0.038 | 4.11 ± 0.93 | 5.33 ± 2.24 | -0.042(0.188) | -0.797(0.045) | 0.0680 |
| TN | 3 | 2 | 0.667 ± 0.314 | 6.31 ± 2.97 | 6.31 ± 4.23 | - | - | 1.0000 |
| CL | 6 | 3 | 0.733 ± 0.155 | 6.49 ± 1.30 | 5.33 ± 2.95 | -0.015(0.957) | -0.091(0.973) | 0.3467 |
| CP | 13 | 8 | 0.885 ± 0.070 | 7.87 ± 1.06 | 8.27 ± 3.56 | -0.035(0.406) | -1.884(0.812) | 0.1142 |
| FL | 5 | 4 | 0.900 ± 0.161 | 8.38 ± 1.93 | 7.78 ± 1.33 | -0.003(0.822) | -0.207(0.792) | 0.3300 |
| HKL | 20 | 7 | 0.789 ± 0.068 | 5.69 ± 0.59 | 5.33 ± 2.24 | -0.037(0.645) | -2.025(0.945) | 0.5288** |
| TML | 8 | 4 | 0.750 ± 0.139 | 2.22 ± 0.36 | 1.56 ± 1.06 | -0.029(0.993) | -1.148(0.724) | 0.1263 |
| YF | 8 | 1 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | - | - | 0.0000 |
| YL | 10 | 3 | 0.511 ± 0.164 | 1.98 ± 1.13 | 2.87 ± 1.57 | -0.035(0.113) | 0.263(0.796) | 0.1669 |
| Region | ||||||||
| NW | 33 | 6 | 0.674 ± 0.078 | 2.81 ± 0.66 | 4.33 ± 1.73 | -0.094(0.130) | -0.088(0.683) | 0.0435 |
| WC | 17 | 9 | 0.890 ± 0.054 | 2.60 ± 0.33 | 2.40 ± 1.24 | 0.000(0.659) | -6.344(0.634) | 0.0614 |
| SW | 50 | 15 | 0.871 ± 0.032 | 3.11 ± 0.49 | 4.83 ± 1.76 | -0.064(0.106) | -1.005(0.012) | 0.0448 |
| SE | 70 | 21 | 0.896 ± 0.019 | 6.25 ± 0.36 | 7.29 ± 2.32 | 0.000(0.254) | -6.017(0.606) | 0.0553 |
| Total | 170 | 35 | 0.895 ± 0.015 | 4.79 ± 0.31 | 8.05 ± 2.22 | -0.041(0.062) | -3.496(0.001) | 0.0211 |
Populations and regions are defined in Table 1.
Tajima's D and Fu's Fs were estimated based on the coalescent simulations with 1000 replicates in consideration of recombination.
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.00001 for the raggedness index reject the null hypothesis of expectation under a sudden demographic expansion model.
N is the number of sequences; H is the number of haplotypes; Hd is the haplotype diversity; π and θ are the nucleotide diversity estimates.
Pairwise FST estimates among the four geographic regions of Cinnamomum kanehirae.
| NW | WC | SW | SE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NW | - | 0.018 | 0.006 | |
| WC | 0.006 | - | 0.032 | |
| SW | 0.016 | 0.012 | - | |
| - |
The bold values indicate comparisons between the SE and other regions.
Above the diagonal: estimates for Lfy.
Below the diagonal: estimates for Chs.
Geographic regions are defined in Figure 1.
Significant FST P values: * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.00001.
Figure 2Proportions of common and rare haplotypes of . The white bar indicates the proportion of haplotypes that specifically appeared in only one of the four regions; the dark bar is the proportion of haplotypes that also appeared in one of the three other regions; the intermediate-gray bar is the proportion of haplotypes that also appeared in two of the three other regions; and the light-gray bar indicates the proportion of haplotypes that appeared in all four regions.
Figure 3The number of migrants through time. Amplitudes of migrations through time are indicated by the parameter M multiplied by one thousand.
Summary of the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA).
| Source of variation | df | Variance component | % variation | Fixation indices | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) 4 regions | ||||||
| Among regions | 3 | 39.775 | 0.091 | 1.76 | ΦCT | 0.10362 |
| Among populations within regions | 15 | 110.731 | 0.255 | 4.92 | ΦSC | 0.03715* |
| Within populations | 191 | 922.56 | 4.83 | 93.32 | ΦST | 0.008* |
| Total | 209 | 1073.07 | 5.176 | 100 | ||
| Among regions | 3 | 38.162 | 0.181 | 9.07 | ΦCT | 0.06843 |
| Among populations within regions | 15 | 74.078 | 0.416 | 20.89 | ΦSC | < 0.00001* |
| Within populations | 151 | 210.737 | 1.396 | 70.04 | ΦST | < 0.00001* |
| Total | 169 | 322.976 | 1.993 | 100 | ||
| (2) E and W | ||||||
| Among regions | 1 | 29.693 | 0.23 | 4.36 | ΦCT | 0.00978* |
| Among populations within regions | 17 | 120.813 | 0.214 | 4.05 | ΦSC | 0.04203* |
| Within populations | 191 | 922.56 | 4.83 | 91.58 | ΦST | 0.00489* |
| Total | 209 | 1073.067 | 5.274 | 100 | ||
| Among regions | 1 | 35.415 | 0.35925 | 16.95 | ΦCT | 0.01075* |
| Among populations within regions | 17 | 76.824 | 0.36443 | 17.2 | ΦSC | < 0.00001* |
| Within populations | 151 | 210.737 | 1.39561 | 65.85 | ΦST | < 0.00001* |
| Total | 169 | 322.976 | 2.11929 | |||
| (3) Three western regions | ||||||
| Among regions | 2 | 10.082 | -0.16840 | -2.98 | ΦCT = -0.02983 | 0.95205 |
| Among populations within regions | 9 | 90.017 | 0.46911 | 8.31 | ΦSC = 0.08068 | 0.02513* |
| Within populations | 125 | 668.178 | 5.34543 | 94.67 | ΦST = 0.05326 | 0.02811* |
| Total | 136 | 768.277 | 5.64613 | |||
| Among regions | 2 | 2.747 | -0.04460 | -3.91 | ΦCT = -0.3910 | 0.67097 |
| Among populations within regions | 9 | 22.460 | 0.19358 | 16.97 | ΦSC = 0.16330 | < 0.00001* |
| Within populations | 88 | 87.283 | 0.99186 | 86.94 | ΦST = 0.13058 | < 0.00001* |
| Total | 99 | 112.490 | 1.14083 | |||
* Statistically significant (P < 0.05)
Three comparisons for the AMOVA were made for both Chs and Lfy loci: (1) four geographic regions as defined by Lin et al. [35], (2) the eastern (E) and western (W) parts separated by the Central Mountain Range (CMR), and (3) the three geographic regions west of the CMR
Estimated spatial expansion parameters for Cinnamomum kanehirae.
| Estimated parameters/Geographic region | NW | WC | SW | SE | Western | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tau (95% CI) | 25.8 | 22.4 | 22.1 | 5.5 | 22.6 | 5 |
| Theta (95% CI) | 5.19 | 9.00 | 9.74 | 0.49(0.00072~2.12) | 8.73(0.09066~13.99) | 2.785 |
| Migration rate (95% CI) | 0.89 | 0.52 | 0.43 | 1.65 | 0.52 | 2.27 |
| SSD | 0.0232 | 0.01866 | 0.02165 | 0.06415 | 0.0137 | 0.02117 |
| 0.505 | 0.566 | 0.406 | 0.268 | 0.649 | 0.502 | |
| Tau (95% CI) | 8.95 | 2.10 | 2.00 | 2.50 | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Theta (95% CI) | 2.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.19 | 0.44 | 3.11 |
| Migration rate (95% CI) | 0.02 | 99999 | 99999 | 8.08 | 99999 | 74.76 |
| SSD | 0.013 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.032 | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.24 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.38 | |
Confidence intervals (CI), α = 0.05.
SSD: sum of squared deviations.
Geographic regions are defined in Figure 1.
Values were obtained from the mismatch distribution under the spatial expansion model.
Figure 4Bayesian skyline plot revealing the demographic trends of . The population size was measured as the effective population size per generation. MIS, marine isotope stage.