Literature DB >> 20431435

Fusion rates and subsidence of morselized local bone grafted in titanium cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion using quantitative three-dimensional computed tomography scans.

Jae Hyup Lee1, Do-Whan Jeon, Suk-Jae Lee, Bong-Soon Chang, Choon-Ki Lee.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, controlled study.
OBJECTIVE: To determine fusion rates, cage to bone contact area ratios, and subsidences using titanium cages filled with a local bone graft for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PLIF using decompressed local bone inserted in titanium cages combined with pedicle screw fixation is a popular procedure for treating lumbar spine degeneration. There is no report about cage to bone contact area ratios using titanium cages filled with a local bone graft for PLIF.
METHODS: PLIF using a titanium cage filled with excised laminar and facet joint bone with pedicle screw fixation was performed in 54 (78 levels) consecutive patients. Mean age at the time of surgery was 62.5 years. Radiographic assessments of posterior and anterior disc heights were performed. Three-dimensional thin-section computed tomography assessments of cage subsidences, fused area ratios of local bone inside cages, and overall fusion rates were analyzed.
RESULTS: Mean values of anterior and posterior disc heights at 1 year after surgery were significantly greater than mean preoperative disc heights. The fusion rate of cages over both upper and lower segment endplates was 96.2%. The ratios of fused areas of local bone inside cages exposed to upper and lower segment endplates were 46.7% and 52.2% in the coronal plane and 46.4% and 49.9% in the sagittal 3-dimensional computed tomography plane, respectively. And, subsidences of titanium cages at upper and lower segment endplates were 1.26 mm and 0.72 mm in the coronal plane and 1.04 mm and 0.53 mm in the sagittal plane, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The ratio of fused area of local bone inside cages at regions exposed to endplates was <50%, which is insufficient for physiologic load transmission. The authors recommend that additional bone should be grafted into the disc space or new bone bonding interbody spacer should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20431435     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c4baf5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  20 in total

1.  Stand-alone ALIF with integrated intracorporeal anchoring plates in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disc disease: a prospective study on 65 cases.

Authors:  Jérôme Allain; Joël Delecrin; Jacques Beaurain; Alexandre Poignard; Thierry Vila; Charles-Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Demineralized bone matrix, as a graft enhancer of auto-local bone in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Dong Ki Ahn; Sang Ho Moon; Tae Woo Kim; Kyung Hwan Boo; Sung Won Hong
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-04-08

3.  A preclinical large animal study on a novel intervertebral fusion cage covered with high porosity titanium sheets with a triple pore structure used for spinal fusion.

Authors:  Katsuhisa Yamada; Manabu Ito; Toshiyuki Akazawa; Masaru Murata; Toru Yamamoto; Norimasa Iwasaki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  [The PLIF and TLIF techniques. Indication, technique, advantages, and disadvantages].

Authors:  C Fleege; M Rickert; M Rauschmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Comparing the process of creeping substitution between allograft bone and local bone grafting in lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hui Huang; Chun Jiang; ZhenZhou Feng; Xiaoxing Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  [Posterior lumbar interbody fusion implants. Software assisted planning--preliminary results].

Authors:  M Rickert; M Arabmotlagh; C Carstens; E Behrbalk; M Rauschmann; C Fleege
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  M Formica; D Vallerga; A Zanirato; L Cavagnaro; M Basso; S Divano; L Mosconi; E Quarto; G Siri; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2020-01-01

8.  The efficacy of porous hydroxyapatite bone chip as an extender of local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hyoungmin Kim; Choon-Ki Lee; Jin-Sup Yeom; Jae-Hyup Lee; Ki-Ho Lee; Bong-Soon Chang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The use of beta-tricalcium phosphate and bone marrow aspirate as a bone graft substitute in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Martin Thaler; Ricarda Lechner; Michaela Gstöttner; Conrad Kobel; Christian Bach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Trabecular metal spacers as standalone or with pedicle screw augmentation, in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Erik Van de Kelft; Johan Van Goethem
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.