Literature DB >> 25626702

[Posterior lumbar interbody fusion implants. Software assisted planning--preliminary results].

M Rickert1, M Arabmotlagh, C Carstens, E Behrbalk, M Rauschmann, C Fleege.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sagittal imbalance, adjacent segment degeneration, and loss of correction due to cage sintering are the main reasons for revision surgery after lumbar fusion. Based on the experience from hip and knee replacement surgery, preoperative software-assisted planning combined with the corresponding cages is helpful to achieve better long-term results.
OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the procedure regarding intraoperative application of preoperative planning and examination to what extent the planning was correct.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 30 patients were included in the period from September 2012 to May 2013 in an observational study, planned preoperatively with the planning software, and treated with the corresponding PLIF cages. The radiological evaluation was performed by thin-layer CT after 3 months.
RESULTS: A total of 24 (80%) patients were followed up after 3 months. In these 24 patients, the preoperative planning actually was correct in 17 cases with the intraoperatively implanted cage, which corresponds to a match of about 71%. The fusion rate for these 24 patients who underwent full examinations was 91.7%.
CONCLUSION: The results of this observational study to evaluate the planning of intervertebral cages show positive experience with this novel therapeutic concept. Despite the limited number of participants, good results were observed for the intraoperative implementation of the planned cages and an adequate fusion rate was obtained. Irrespective of this, a software-based surgical planning must be questioned critically any time. Ultimately, it is the surgeon's responsibility to modify the planned procedure intraoperatively if necessary. Currently, the influence of this planning regarding the long-term course and the important question of adjacent segment instability remains unanswered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25626702     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-014-3072-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  21 in total

1.  Radiologic assessment of interbody fusion using carbon fiber cages.

Authors:  Edward R G Santos; David G Goss; Russel K Morcom; Robert D Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The importance of the endplate for interbody cages in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Reduction of disc space distraction after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous iliac crest graft.

Authors:  Kenneth M C Cheung; Y G Zhang; D S Lu; Keith D K Luk; John C Y Leong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Accuracy of digital templating in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  David R Whiddon; James V Bono; Jason E Lang; Eric L Smith; Aaron K Salyapongse
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2011-08

5.  Biomechanical study on the effect of five different lumbar reconstruction techniques on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and lamina strain.

Authors:  Hideki Sudo; Itaru Oda; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Manabu Ito; Yoshihisa Kotani; Akio Minami
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2006-08

6.  Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial.

Authors:  J W Brantigan; A D Steffee; M L Lewis; L M Quinn; J M Persenaire
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  [Importance of sagittal alignment in spinal revision surgery].

Authors:  C Klöckner; R Spur; B Wiedenhöfer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Long-term follow-up of lower lumbar fusion patients.

Authors:  T R Lehmann; K F Spratt; J E Tozzi; J N Weinstein; S J Reinarz; G Y el-Khoury; H Colby
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Pseudarthrosis rate after allograft posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw and plate fixation.

Authors:  J W Brantigan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Understanding sagittal balance with a clinical perspective.

Authors:  I J Harding
Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.874

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.