| Literature DB >> 20428034 |
Fanli Kong1, Mingwei Zhang, Sentai Liao, Shujuan Yu, Jianwei Chi, Zhencheng Wei.
Abstract
Natural antioxidants such as polysaccharides with strong antioxidant activities are used to protect against oxidative damage, yet little is known so far about the antioxidant effects of litchi fruit polysaccharides. In the present study, four different polysaccharide-enriched fractions were isolated from litchi pulp tissue and partially purified by a stepwise method of ethyl alcohol (EtOH) precipitation. Their chemical and physical characteristics were determined by chemical methods, gas chromatography and IR spectrophotometry. Antioxidant activities of these fractions were investigated using various in vitro assay systems. These four polysaccharide-enriched fractions exhibited a dose-dependent free radical scavenging activity as shown by their DPPH radical, superoxide anion and hydroxyl radical inhibition, chelating ability and reducing power. Among the different fractions, LFP-III showed the strongest scavenging activity against DPPH radical, superoxide and hydroxyl radicals and chelating ability. These findings suggest litchi polysaccharides from pulp tissue have potential as functional foods with enhanced antioxidant activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20428034 PMCID: PMC6257371 DOI: 10.3390/molecules15042152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Flow sheet for extraction and fractionation polysaccharides from litchi pulp tissue by EtOH stepwise precipitation.
Components of monosaccharide and properties of polysaccharides from pulp of litchi.
| LFP-I | LFP-II | LFP-III | LFP-IV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protein (wt%) | 2.81 | 1.31 | 4.24 | 1.23 |
| Carbohydrate (wt%) | 79.21 | 85.15 | 93.09 | 96.77 |
| Sugar components (mol%) | ||||
| D-arabinose | 1.95 | 1.00 | 1.30 | 1.60 |
| L-rhamnose | 2.00 | 1.20 | 1.91 | 1.00 |
| D-ribose | 1.00 | nd | 1.54 | nd |
| D-galactose | 2.04 | nd | 2.13 | 1.07 |
| D-glucose | 1.57 | 1.47 | 1.00 | 1.21 |
# nd: not detected.
Figure 2(a) Scavenging effect of LFPs on DPPH radicals. Each value is presented as mean ± standard error (n=3). (b) Scavenging effect of TBHQ on DPPH radicals. Experimental results were means ± standard error of three parallel measurements.
Figure 3Scavenging effect of LFPs on superoxide radicals. Each value is presented as mean ± standard error of three parallel measurements for each concentration.
Figure 4Scavenging effect of LFPs on hydroxyl radicals, using the control of Vc. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Figure 5(a) Chelating ability of LFP. Each sample was assayed in triplicate for each concentration. Each value is presented as mean ± standard error. (b) Chelating ability of EDTA. Each value is presented as mean± standard error (n = 3).
Figure 6Reducing power of LFPs. Each sample was assayed in triplicate for each concentration. Experimental results were means ± SD of three parallel measurements. Each value is presented as mean± standard error (n = 3).