Literature DB >> 25119193

Response of red deer stags (Cervus elaphus) to playback of harsh versus common roars.

Maxime Garcia1, Megan T Wyman, Benjamin D Charlton, W Tecumseh Fitch, David Reby.   

Abstract

Red deer stags (Cervus elaphus) give two distinct types of roars during the breeding season, the "common roar" and the "harsh roar." Harsh roars are more frequent during contexts of intense competition, and characterized by a set of features that increase their perceptual salience, suggesting that they signal heightened arousal. While common roars have been shown to encode size information and mediate both male competition and female choice, to our knowledge, the specific function of harsh roars during male competition has not yet been studied. Here, we investigate the hypothesis that the specific structure of male harsh roars signals high arousal to competitors. We contrast the behavioral responses of free ranging, harem-holding stags to the playback of harsh roars from an unfamiliar competitor with their response to the playback of common roars from the same animal. We show that males react less strongly to sequences of harsh roars than to sequences of common roars, possibly because they are reluctant to escalate conflicts with highly motivated and threatening unfamiliar males in the absence of visual information. While future work should investigate the response of stags to harsh roars from familiar opponents, our observations remain consistent with the hypothesis that harsh roars may signal motivation during male competition, and illustrate how intrasexual selection can contribute to the diversification of male vocal signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25119193     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-014-1217-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  11 in total

1.  Oestrous red deer hinds prefer male roars with higher fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  David Reby; Benjamin D Charlton; Yann Locatelli; Karen McComb
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The function of nonlinear phenomena in meerkat alarm calls.

Authors:  Simon W Townsend; Marta B Manser
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  The descended larynx is not uniquely human.

Authors:  W T Fitch; D Reby
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Red deer stags use formants as assessment cues during intrasexual agonistic interactions.

Authors:  David Reby; Karen McComb; Bruno Cargnelutti; Chris Darwin; W Tecumseh Fitch; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Rutting vocalizations of Formosan sika deer Cervus nippon taiouanus-acoustic structure, seasonal and diurnal variations, and individuality.

Authors:  Shih-Ching Yen; Bao-Sen Shieh; Yi-Ting Wang; Ying Wang
Journal:  Zoolog Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.931

6.  Automatic classification and speaker identification of African elephant (Loxodonta africana) vocalizations.

Authors:  Patrick J Clemins; Michael T Johnson; Kirsten M Leong; Anne Savage
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Female red deer prefer the roars of larger males.

Authors:  Benjamin D Charlton; David Reby; Karen McComb
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Attention grabbing in red deer sexual calls.

Authors:  David Reby; Benjamin D Charlton
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Variability of female responses to conspecific vs. heterospecific male mating calls in polygynous deer: an open door to hybridization?

Authors:  Megan T Wyman; Benjamin D Charlton; Yann Locatelli; David Reby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Do red deer stags (Cervus elaphus) use roar fundamental frequency (F0) to assess rivals?

Authors:  Maxime Garcia; Benjamin D Charlton; Megan T Wyman; W Tecumseh Fitch; David Reby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  The progression pattern of male hyrax songs and the role of climactic ending.

Authors:  Vlad Demartsev; Amiyaal Ilany; Arik Kershenbaum; Yair Geva; Ori Margalit; Inbar Schnitzer; Adi Barocas; Einat Bar-Ziv; Lee Koren; Eli Geffen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  How small could a pup sound? The physical bases of signaling body size in harbor seals.

Authors:  Andrea Ravignani; Stephanie Gross; Maxime Garcia; Ana Rubio-Garcia; Bart de Boer
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.624

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.